Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

NCT number NCT04099784
Other study ID # CS/BVMÐ/19/08
Secondary ID
Status Completed
Phase
First received
Last updated
Start date September 1, 2019
Est. completion date November 20, 2019

Study information

Verified date November 2019
Source M? Ð?c Hospital
Contact n/a
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Observational

Clinical Trial Summary

In order to give strong recommendation on the efficacy and safety of fresh versus frozen embryo transfer, we conduct this study in order to investigate the physical and mental development of children from fresh versus frozen embryo transfer. Based on our Freeze-only study (Vuong et al., 2018), the women without polycystic ovary syndrome undergoing the first or second IVF were randomly assigned to receive either fresh or frozen embryos on day 3 after oocyte retrieval, which leads to the similarity in characteristics of these two groups. Hence, the result from analysing these offsprings would be preciously valuable.


Description:

Since the first live birth after the transfer of a frozen-thawed embryo reported in 1984, cryopreservation has been considered as an enormous revolution in assisted reproductive technology (ART). It is observed that the trend of ART cycles using frozen embryo transfer is on the increase, which leads to a great deal number of children born from frozen embryos. This is the commencement of 2 embryo transfer strategies, the first one is transferring the fresh embryos, the other is freezing all the embryos and transfer them in the next cycle.

Comparing these two strategies, up till now, there are 4 published randomized control trials (RCTs) indicating different methods for certain groups of patients (Chen et al., 2016; Shi et al., 2018; Vuong et al., 2018; Wei et al., 2019). Regarding the efficacy, the freeze-all strategy outweighs the fresh embryo transfer in women with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS). While that efficacy gets a controversy in non-PCOS or ovulatory patients; two groups of authors indicated that these 2 strategies are equally effective, while the other group claims that the better result goes to cycles with frozen embryos. In term of safety, the rate of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) is the equivalent or lower in the freeze-all group, which implies the important role of embryo-freezing in avoiding maternal risk. The question that whether freezing the embryos exerts effect on offspring is not thoroughly understood. The mostly used parameter in evaluating the safety of children is the perinatal status of infants, not the development of these children.

Searching literature, in 2010, S. Pelkonen published a large cohort study indicating that freezing the embryos do not change the rate of prematurity, low birthweight and being small for gestational age (Pelkonen et al., 2010). Looking further in our freeze-only study, our sub-analysis indicates that the livebirth weight of infants born from frozen embryos is 300 gram heavier than that from fresh embryos (Vuong et al., 2018). Following 4 studies comparing fresh and frozen embryo transfer, children from frozen embryos are similar or higher in term of newborn weight, and there is no study investigate the onward development of childrens born from these two strategies. The only proof on the development of children born from fresh verus frozen embryo is from one study with no randomization which states that children from fresh and frozen embryos share similar academic performance at the age 15-16 (Spangmose et al., 2019). We found no study investigate the impact of different embryo transfer strategies on the growth of children resulting from either fresh or frozen embryos.

In order to give strong recommendation on the efficacy and safety of fresh versus frozen embryo transfer, we conduct this study in order to investigate the physical and mental development of children from fresh versus frozen embryo transfer. Based on our Freeze-only study (Vuong et al., 2018), the women without polycystic ovary syndrome undergoing the first or second IVF were randomly assigned to receive either fresh or frozen embryos on day 3 after oocyte retrieval, which leads to the similarity in characteristics of these two groups. Hence, the result from analysing these offsprings would be preciously valuable.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Completed
Enrollment 255
Est. completion date November 20, 2019
Est. primary completion date November 15, 2019
Accepts healthy volunteers Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Gender All
Age group 1 Month to 66 Months
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria:

- Live babies born from the first transfer of both freeze-only and fresh embryo transfer group from our Freeze-only study.

- Parents agree to participate in the study.

Exclusion Criteria:

- Babies died after perinatal period.

Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


Intervention

Other:
Developmental score according to The Ages & Stages Questionnaires®, Third Edition - ASQ®-3
Ages & Stages Questionnaires®, Third Edition (ASQ®-3) is a developmental screening tool designed for use by early educators and health care professionals. It relies on parents as experts, is easy-to-use, family-friendly and creates the snapshot needed to catch delays and celebrate milestones.
Physical development and General Health
Physical development and General health examination
Developmental Red flags
Developmental Red flags Questionnaires

Locations

Country Name City State
Vietnam M? Ð?c Hospital Ho Chi Minh City Tan Binh

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
M? Ð?c Hospital

Country where clinical trial is conducted

Vietnam, 

References & Publications (6)

Chen ZJ, Shi Y, Sun Y, Zhang B, Liang X, Cao Y, Yang J, Liu J, Wei D, Weng N, Tian L, Hao C, Yang D, Zhou F, Shi J, Xu Y, Li J, Yan J, Qin Y, Zhao H, Zhang H, Legro RS. Fresh versus Frozen Embryos for Infertility in the Polycystic Ovary Syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2016 Aug 11;375(6):523-33. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1513873. Erratum in: N Engl J Med. 2016 Nov 17;375(20):2010. — View Citation

Pelkonen S, Koivunen R, Gissler M, Nuojua-Huttunen S, Suikkari AM, Hydén-Granskog C, Martikainen H, Tiitinen A, Hartikainen AL. Perinatal outcome of children born after frozen and fresh embryo transfer: the Finnish cohort study 1995-2006. Hum Reprod. 2010 Apr;25(4):914-23. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dep477. Epub 2010 Feb 2. — View Citation

Shi Y, Sun Y, Hao C, Zhang H, Wei D, Zhang Y, Zhu Y, Deng X, Qi X, Li H, Ma X, Ren H, Wang Y, Zhang D, Wang B, Liu F, Wu Q, Wang Z, Bai H, Li Y, Zhou Y, Sun M, Liu H, Li J, Zhang L, Chen X, Zhang S, Sun X, Legro RS, Chen ZJ. Transfer of Fresh versus Frozen Embryos in Ovulatory Women. N Engl J Med. 2018 Jan 11;378(2):126-136. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1705334. — View Citation

Spangmose AL, Malchau SS, Henningsen AA, Forman JL, Rasmussen S, Loft A, Schmidt L, Pinborg A. Academic performance in adolescents aged 15-16 years born after frozen embryo transfer compared with fresh embryo transfer: a nationwide registry-based cohort study. BJOG. 2019 Jan;126(2):261-269. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.15484. Epub 2018 Oct 24. — View Citation

Vuong LN, Dang VQ, Ho TM, Huynh BG, Ha DT, Pham TD, Nguyen LK, Norman RJ, Mol BW. IVF Transfer of Fresh or Frozen Embryos in Women without Polycystic Ovaries. N Engl J Med. 2018 Jan 11;378(2):137-147. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1703768. — View Citation

Wei D, Liu JY, Sun Y, Shi Y, Zhang B, Liu JQ, Tan J, Liang X, Cao Y, Wang Z, Qin Y, Zhao H, Zhou Y, Ren H, Hao G, Ling X, Zhao J, Zhang Y, Qi X, Zhang L, Deng X, Chen X, Zhu Y, Wang X, Tian LF, Lv Q, Ma X, Zhang H, Legro RS, Chen ZJ. Frozen versus fresh single blastocyst transfer in ovulatory women: a multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2019 Mar 30;393(10178):1310-1318. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32843-5. Epub 2019 Feb 28. — View Citation

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Other Gestational age at delivery Gestational age at delivery At birth
Other Mode of delivery Vaginal birth or C-section At birth
Other Birth weight Weight of baby born At birth
Other Length circumference Head circumference after birth Head circumference after birth Head circumference after birth Length circumference after birth At birth
Other Head circumference Head circumference after birth At birth
Other Rate of congenital anomalies Any congenital anomalies detected in baby born At birth
Other Length of neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission Number of admission days to NICU Up to 28 days after birth
Other Rate of Respiratory distress syndrome Respiratory distress syndrome (RDS), diagnosed as the presence of tachypnoea >60/minute, sternal recession and expiratory grunting, need for supplemental oxygen, and a radiological picture of diffuse reticulogranular shadowing with an air bronchogram Up to 28 days after birth
Other Rate of Periventricular haemorrhage Periventricular haemorrhage II B or worse, will be diagnosed by repeated neonatal cranial ultrasound by the neonatologist according to the guidelines on neuro-imaging described by de Vries et al. Up to 28 days after birth
Other Rate of Necrotizing enterocolitis Necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) will be diagnosed according to Bell. Up to 28 days after birth
Other Rate of Proven sepsis Proven sepsis, will be diagnosed on the combination of clinical signs and positive blood cultures. Up to 28 days after birth
Other Rate of Composite of poor perinatal outcomes Composite of poor perinatal outcomes, defined as intraventricular haemorrhage, respiratory distress syndrome, necrotizing enterocolitis or neonatal sepsis. Up to 28 days after birth
Other The rate of long-term illness and chronic conditions Any long-term illness and chronic condition appears in a child Up to 66 months after birth
Primary The average total ASQ-3 score ASQ-3 (Ages and Stages Questionaires®) has 5 aspects: Communication, Gross motor, Fine motor, Problem solving and Personal-Social Each aspect has 6 questions, if the answer is Yes, score = 10, Sometimes = 5 and Not yet = 0.
ASQ-3 average = average score of 5 aspects.
Up to 66 months after birth
Secondary Score of Communication 6 questions, if the answer is Yes, score = 10, Sometimes = 5 and Not yet = 0. Total score will be used: minimum = 0 and maximum = 60. Each aspects in each stages has alternative threshold Up to 66 months after birth
Secondary Score of Gross motor 6 questions, if the answer is Yes, score = 10, Sometimes = 5 and Not yet = 0. Up to 66 months after birth
Secondary Score of Fine motor 6 questions, if the answer is Yes, score = 10, Sometimes = 5 and Not yet = 0. Up to 66 months after birth
Secondary Score of Problem solving 6 questions, if the answer is Yes, score = 10, Sometimes = 5 and Not yet = 0. Up to 66 months after birth
Secondary Score of Personal-Social 6 questions, if the answer is Yes, score = 10, Sometimes = 5 and Not yet = 0. Up to 66 months after birth
Secondary The rate of children who have at least one red flag sign He or she has at least one red flag sign by age
From 2 to < 3 year-old:
Has very unclear speech
Doesn't understand simple instruction • Doesn't speak in sentences
Doesn't make eye contact
Loses skills he/she once had
From 3 to < 4 year-old:
Can't jump in place
Doesn't play pretend or make-believe • Speaks unclearly
Can't retell a favorite story
Doesn't use "me" and "you" correctly
Loses skills he/she once had
From 4 to < 5.5 year-old:
Is easily distracted, has trouble focusing on one activity for more than 5 minutes • Doesn't talk about daily activities or experiences
Shows extreme behavior
Loses skills he/she once had
From 2 to 5.5 years after birth
Secondary Duration of breast-feeding Duration of breast-feeding Up to 24 months after birth
Secondary Infant age at which weaning starts Infant age at which weaning starts Up to 24 months after birth
Secondary Name of diseases that lead to hospital admission Name of diseases that lead to hospital admission Up to 66 months after birth
Secondary Number of hospital admission Number of hospital admission Up to 66 months after birth
Secondary Weight Weight on the examination date Through study completion, an average of 1.5 months
Secondary Height Height on the examination date Through study completion, an average of 1.5 months
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Completed NCT03607409 - Role of Inhibin A as Biomarker for Ovarian Response for IVF Treatment
Recruiting NCT02312076 - GnRHa for Luteal Phase Support in Long GnRHa Protocol Cycles Phase 4
Terminated NCT02161861 - Improvement of IVF Fertilization Rates, by the Cyclic Tripeptide FEE - Prospective Randomized Study N/A
Completed NCT03287479 - Comparison of a Semi-automated Closed Vitrification System (Gavi®) With a Manual Open Vitrification Sytem (Cryotop®) N/A
Terminated NCT03522350 - Randomized Trial Comparing EmbryoScope With EmbryoScope+. N/A
Completed NCT04496284 - Embryo Transfer Outcomes After Vitrification With Slush Nitrogen Compared to Liquid Nitrogen N/A
Completed NCT03623659 - pArtiaL zonA pelluciDa Removal by assisteD hatchINg of Blastocysts N/A
Completed NCT03895099 - New Ovarian Stimulation With Random Start, Use of Progestin Protocol for Oocyte Donors Phase 3
Active, not recruiting NCT04142112 - Randomized, Standard-Controlled, Study to Evaluate the Ohana IVF Sperm Preparation Kit, SPeRtility IVF Next Generation N/A
Completed NCT03152643 - Cumulative Live Birth Rates After Cleavage-stage Versus Blastocyst-stage Embryo Transfer N/A
Recruiting NCT03683771 - Assessment of Endometrial Pattern and Sub-endometrial Vascularity in ICSI Outcome
Recruiting NCT03161119 - Comparing Two Different Embryo Transfer Catheters N/A
Completed NCT04108039 - Micronized Progesterone vs Gonadotropin-releasing Hormone (GnRH) Antagonist in Freeze-all IVF Cycles. N/A
Completed NCT03678571 - Oocyte Vitrification Aided With Latrunculin A N/A
Completed NCT03678558 - Oocyte Vitrification Aided With Cytochalasin B N/A
Completed NCT03678818 - Supplementing Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection Handling Medium With Latrunculin A (ICSI-LA) N/A
Completed NCT03678584 - Supplementing Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection Handling Medium With Chaetoglobosin A ( ICSI-CA) N/A
Completed NCT03677492 - Supplementing Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection Handling Medium With Cytochalasin D ( ICSI-CD) N/A
Completed NCT03678597 - Supplementing Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection Handling Medium With Latrunculin B ( ICSI-LB) N/A
Completed NCT03678610 - Handling Medium for ICSI With Ionomycin and Latrunculin A N/A