Infertility Clinical Trial
Official title:
Preimplantation Genetic Screening (PGS) Using Microarray Technique: Method to Select the Embryo With the Greatest Chance for Successful Implantation During in Vitro Fertilization in Couples With a History of Unsuccessful IVF Attempts
This project intends to use preimplantation genetic screening (PGS) with the microarray technique to determine the chromosome composition of fertilized eggs, so that only chromosomally normal embryos are transferred during IVF. The purpose is to increase the probability of pregnancy and childbirth among couples with a history of repeated unsuccessful IVF attempts.
Background In vitro fertilization (IVF) is the most important method to remedy infertility,
whether the cause is the male or the female, or when the cause is unknown. Treatment usually
involves the transfer to the uterus of a fertilized egg (embryo) that has been cultured for
2-5 days. To select the embryo with the best chance of successful implantation into the
endometrium, microscopic evaluation is currently used to grade embryonic cell division,
cellular appearance, and other factors. But this method is incomplete because it cannot
determine the functional properties of the embryo, or whether it is genetically normal. It
is known that couples with a history of multiple unsuccessful IVF treatments produce a large
number of embryos that have an abnormal number of chromosomes (aneuploidy), which is also
common in women over age 38.
This project intends to use preimplantation genetic screening (PGS) with the microarray
technique to determine the chromosome composition of fertilized eggs, so that only
chromosomally normal embryos are transferred during IVF. The purpose is to increase the
probability of pregnancy and childbirth among couples with a history of repeated
unsuccessful IVF attempts. We have previously conducted a prospective randomized study with
a similar question (Ö 612-02) on a target group of older women (>38 years) using sampling
(biopsy) of the embryo on day 3 of culture, followed by analysis of seven chromosome pairs
using the FISH technique. The results of the study showed no improvement in pregnancy
outcome . The reasons are probably 1) to begin with, normal eggs are infrequent in this
target group; 2) the biopsy was performed on day 3 when the embryo is at a sensitive stage;
and 3) only 7 out of a total of 23 chromosome pairs could be analyzed.
Methodological developments in the field have been rapid, and current technology allows for
better identification of normal embryos compared with the previous study.
- We know that the embryo is less sensitive when a biopsy is carried out on day 5 (of the
blastocyst stage) instead of day 3.
- In blastocyst biopsy, more cells are removed for diagnosis than on a day 3 biopsy
(thereby increasing the reliability of the analysis).
- Blastocyst biopsy involves removal of fewer cells on a percentage basis (3-5%) from the
total cell mass of the blastocyst compared with the previously used day 3 biopsy, which
involved removal of up to 25% of the total number of cells.
- Blastocysts have a higher implantation rate than day 3 embryos.
- Array Comparative Genomic Hybridization (aCGH) can now be used with great precision to
analyze all chromosomes using commercial quality-controlled kits.
- Cryopreservation with vitrification of blastocysts is currently a highly successful
technique that allows the analysis to be conducted without being pressed for time.
In addition, we will turn to a patient group consisting of women with a proven normal-good
ovarian reserve. In the previous study involving women >38 years, the ovarian reserve was
generally poor.
The preparatory work for the Genetic Integrity Act stated that PGS should "be reserved for
clearly defined research projects approved in an ethical review by an ethics committee."
This restriction was imposed because the state of knowledge about PGS at that time was very
limited. More experience from research projects on PGS was considered necessary to determine
whether PGS could be used in clinical practice. The above mentioned preparatory work for the
Genetic Integrity Act also states that PGS "may become an important tool to increase chances
of pregnancy in conjunction with IVF treatment ...". In this project, we intend to
investigate whether it is possible to increase the chance of pregnancy and childbirth among
couples who have undergone several previous failed IVF attempts. Our hypothesis is based on
the assumption that an incorrect number of chromosomes is often the underlying cause of
failed implantation or miscarriage. To increase the chances of establishing a pregnancy that
leads to childbirth, we are conducting a chromosome analysis on the embryos of couples to
ensure that only embryos with a normal chromosome set are transferred to the woman.
Question Can the probability of pregnancy and childbirth in couples with several previous
failed IVF attempts increase if a normal chromosome set can be ensured in the embryo before
it is transferred? As a control, we will compare the results of IVF attempts where only
light microscopic evaluation is performed.
Primary endpoint: Delivery per randomized patient Secondary endpoints: Cumulative pregnancy
rate including later transfer of remaining vitrified blastocysts (higher rate expected in
study group). Miscarriage rate during the first 18 weeks of pregnancy (lower rate expected
in study group).
Methods and materials Patients Couples with a history of at least three unsuccessful IVF
attempts, in which the woman is a maximum of 39 years of age, will be invited in conjunction
with their consultation for a new IVF treatment at any of IVF Sweden clinics to participate
in the study, provided that they meet the inclusion criteria (including expected normal
response to hormone stimulation with 8-10 eggs). The women who agree to participate in the
study will be randomized (by computer) to either the biopsy or the control group the day
after collection of oocytes if they have at least 5 fertilized eggs (current procedure for
culture on day 5).
Inclusion criteria: Couples who meet the criteria for IVF treatment and who have a history
of at least three previous IVF cycles including embryo transfer without delivery. The woman
may be a maximum of 39 years old when the study is carried out and must have a normal-good
ovarian reserve ( at least 12 antral follicles). Her partner must be able to provide a semen
sample containing live sperm. Women included in the study will not participate in any other
research project.
Exclusion criteria: Myoma, or other uterine lesions judged to affect implantation.
Nonspecific cysts that are not considered to be functional. Endometrium >3 cm.
Randomization
Randomization will take place on day 1 if the couple meets the requirements established for
culture to the blastocyst stage (at least 5 normally fertilized oocytes). The on-line
randomization program (computerized) will balance the following parameters:
- Age
- Number of oocytes retrieved
Furthermore at the time of randomization, the randomization program will take into account
that a multicenter study is involved to avoid bias.
IVF treatment Hormone stimulation, ultrasound checks, collection of oocytes, and
fertilization will follow standard procedure. For women in the control group, all expanded
blastocysts will be cryopreserved (vitrified) day 5-6 for later transfer. For women
randomized to PGS, cells (trophectoderm cells in the outer cell layer of the embryo) will be
biopsied on day 5-6 after which all biopsied blastocysts will be vitrified. If the analysis
shows a normal chromosome set, the blastocyst will be thawed and transferred during the next
menstrual cycle.
Biopsy and cell lysis The biopsy is carried out by making a hole in the shell of the
blastocyst (zona pellucida) using laser technology and special biopsy equipment and removing
2-5 cells from the outer cell mass (trophoblast cells). The cells are transferred to a test
tube containing PBS solution. An extraction solution is added to lyse the cells, and the DNA
is released into the solution.
Optimization of genome amplification To optimize the protocol for cell lysis and whole
genome amplification, cells from an embryonic stem cell line with trisomy 13 as well as from
a normal karyotype will be used. Three, four and five cells respectively will be pipetted
into PCR tubes. The entire aCGH protocol (see below) will be run on these cells (at least 50
tubes), and the results will be evaluated. This approach will provide us with an idea of the
sensitivity of the method and how often we fail to obtain results due to unsuccessful
amplification. Contamination in the system, if any, will also be revealed.
Array Comparative Genomic Hybridization (aCGH) Reagent for amplification (copying) of the
DNA is added to the DNA extract. Amplification is carried out in several steps using a
technique called "Polymerase Chain Reaction" (PCR). This process requires great accuracy and
special laboratory facilities so that foreign DNA does not contaminate the sample.
Contamination at this step could lead to a misdiagnosis of the chromosome constitution of
the embryos. The amplified DNA is then labeled with a fluorescent molecule which causes the
DNA to fluoresce green under UV illumination. Similarly, normal control DNA is labeled with
a molecule that fluoresces red under UV illumination. Amplified fluorescently labeled DNA is
mixed with an equal volume of normal fluorescently labeled control DNA. This DNA mixture is
applied to test surfaces with specific DNA sequences. These DNA sequences are carefully
selected and placed on the test surfaces in long arrays in a specific order, which means
that DNA from all chromosome arms are represented on the test surface at specific locations.
During the hybridization step, the DNA in the DNA mixture will compete for binding to the
DNA on the test surface. If there are equal amounts of amplified DNA (green) and control DNA
(red), then an equal amount of DNA from both fractions will bind to the test surface. After
hybridization, when the test surface is illuminated with UV light, the green and red
fluorescence will be equally intense, resulting in an orange color (mixture with equal
portions of red and green color). However, if there is an excess of DNA from a given
chromosome in the embryo (e.g., trisomy), more DNA sequences from this chromosome will bind
to the test surface, resulting in an excess of green fluorescence in the area on the test
surface containing the DNA sequences from the relevant chromosome. Similarly, loss of a
chromosome in an embryo results in a shortage of the corresponding DNA in the amplified
fraction, causing more control DNA sequences (red) to bind to the test surface. Test areas
are scanned and results processed automatically in a computerized scanner.
Grading of embryos:
Evaluation and grading of the blastocysts will be done in accordance with accepted
classification according to Gardner in which degree of expansion, cell density, and number
of cells in the inner cell mass (IC) and in the trophectoderm (TE) are assessed. All
blastocysts in the control group will be vitrified for later transfer. A similar evaluation
will be carried out in the biopsy group prior to biopsy. Following biopsy, all biopsied
blastocysts will be vitrified.
In the group in which the biopsy is conducted, microarray analysis will be carried out.
Transfer is done during the natural menstrual cycle 5 days after ovulation. Women with
hormonal disruption require mild hormonal stimulation prior to transfer of the
vitrified/warmed blastocyst.
Vitrification After the blastocysts have been biopsied, they will be vitrified and
subsequently thawed according to well established protocol at the clinics.
Follow-up The primary endpoint is birth per randomized patient. Secondary endpoints are
cumulative pregnancy rate, since extra cryopreserved blastocysts (if any) are also
transferred, and miscarriage rate during the first 18 weeks of pregnancy (lower rate
expected in study group). We plan to create a Data Safety Monitoring Board (DSMB) consisting
of independent external experts when half the study has been completed.
Follow up of all pregnancies and childbirths will be carried out according to current
procedure within IVF.
Statistics Power analysis has shown that to detect a significant difference in pregnancy
outcomes from the estimated 15% in the control group to 40% in the PGS group requires 112
patients (alpha=0.8; Beta=0.20). An estimated attrition rate of about 10% and the planned
DSMB analysis mean that 130 patients should be recruited. The DSMB will monitor the study
and provide periodic advice on whether we should continue the study. The DSMB analysis will
give 3 recommendations: (1) continue the study as planned, (2) stop the study if the
difference between the groups is less than 15 %, (3) continue the study with a larger sample
size. When the difference between the groups are 20 % or greater the study can be continued
with a larger sample size (73 patients in each group The DSMB analysis will advice to
continue or stop the study (due to highly significant effect, negative effect or low
conditional power. DSMB can evaluate both live birth and ongoing pregnancy and weigh all
information when they give the recommendation. The DSMB will consist of specialists who are
experienced in this field. Statistical calculations will be carried out according to
intention-to-treat (ITT), as well as per protocol . ITT are all randomized patients, having
at least 5 fertilized oocytes on day 1. Some patients are likely to have no transfer due to
the lack of blastocysts,or technical problems relating to vitrification/warming etc.
Therefore, analysis will also be done per protocol. Logistic regression will be used in the
statistical calculations and include the stratification variables.
;
Allocation: Randomized, Endpoint Classification: Efficacy Study, Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment, Masking: Double Blind (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator), Primary Purpose: Treatment
| Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Completed |
NCT03607409 -
Role of Inhibin A as Biomarker for Ovarian Response for IVF Treatment
|
||
| Recruiting |
NCT02312076 -
GnRHa for Luteal Phase Support in Long GnRHa Protocol Cycles
|
Phase 4 | |
| Terminated |
NCT02161861 -
Improvement of IVF Fertilization Rates, by the Cyclic Tripeptide FEE - Prospective Randomized Study
|
N/A | |
| Completed |
NCT03287479 -
Comparison of a Semi-automated Closed Vitrification System (Gavi®) With a Manual Open Vitrification Sytem (Cryotop®)
|
N/A | |
| Terminated |
NCT03522350 -
Randomized Trial Comparing EmbryoScope With EmbryoScope+.
|
N/A | |
| Completed |
NCT04496284 -
Embryo Transfer Outcomes After Vitrification With Slush Nitrogen Compared to Liquid Nitrogen
|
N/A | |
| Completed |
NCT03623659 -
pArtiaL zonA pelluciDa Removal by assisteD hatchINg of Blastocysts
|
N/A | |
| Completed |
NCT03895099 -
New Ovarian Stimulation With Random Start, Use of Progestin Protocol for Oocyte Donors
|
Phase 3 | |
| Active, not recruiting |
NCT04142112 -
Randomized, Standard-Controlled, Study to Evaluate the Ohana IVF Sperm Preparation Kit, SPeRtility IVF Next Generation
|
N/A | |
| Completed |
NCT03152643 -
Cumulative Live Birth Rates After Cleavage-stage Versus Blastocyst-stage Embryo Transfer
|
N/A | |
| Recruiting |
NCT03683771 -
Assessment of Endometrial Pattern and Sub-endometrial Vascularity in ICSI Outcome
|
||
| Recruiting |
NCT03161119 -
Comparing Two Different Embryo Transfer Catheters
|
N/A | |
| Completed |
NCT04108039 -
Micronized Progesterone vs Gonadotropin-releasing Hormone (GnRH) Antagonist in Freeze-all IVF Cycles.
|
N/A | |
| Completed |
NCT03678584 -
Supplementing Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection Handling Medium With Chaetoglobosin A ( ICSI-CA)
|
N/A | |
| Completed |
NCT03677492 -
Supplementing Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection Handling Medium With Cytochalasin D ( ICSI-CD)
|
N/A | |
| Completed |
NCT03678610 -
Handling Medium for ICSI With Ionomycin and Latrunculin A
|
N/A | |
| Completed |
NCT03678597 -
Supplementing Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection Handling Medium With Latrunculin B ( ICSI-LB)
|
N/A | |
| Completed |
NCT03678818 -
Supplementing Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection Handling Medium With Latrunculin A (ICSI-LA)
|
N/A | |
| Completed |
NCT03678571 -
Oocyte Vitrification Aided With Latrunculin A
|
N/A | |
| Completed |
NCT03678558 -
Oocyte Vitrification Aided With Cytochalasin B
|
N/A |