View clinical trials related to Infections.
Filter by:Studies on sonication suffer from a heterogeneity which makes their analysis complex, due to the absence of a gold standard allowing positive cases to be defined unequivocally. Thus, the sensitivity of the technique has been assessed on cases defined in different ways, which makes the studies difficult to compare (number of samples taken, number of positive samples, variable duration of culture, etc.). It should nevertheless be noted that the majority of the series conclude with a higher sensitivity than that of standard samples, in particular in the event of a strain with difficult growth (Cutibacterium acnes, deficient Streptococci) or in the event of prior antibiotic therapy. In the absence of a comparative reference allowing to conclude on the intrinsic performances of sonication as a diagnostic test, it seems interesting to evaluate its contribution in current practice, in particular in the difficult cases where the standard culture does not make it possible to fulfill the criterion. major (zero or only one positive sample). To the knowledge of the investigators, there is no study of this kind, which could make it possible to specify the place of this technique in the diagnostic procedure and to improve the care of patients.
This study aims to assess the safety & efficacy of Oral Ciprodiazole® versus currently used Ciprofloxacin Tablets & Metronidazole tablets in pelvi-abdominal infections and following IV antibiotics in post-operative period, for pelvi-abdominal surgeries or acute conditions
This is a multicenter, randomized, controlled, open-label, Phase IIb study of HH-003 injection, HH-003 injection is a monoclonal antibody targeting Hepatitis B virus. This study aims to assess efficacy and safety in subjects with chronic hepatitis delta virus infection.
One of the current health challenges in the face of the COVID-19 pandemic that started in Wuhan in 2019, and still responsible for successive waves, is to better understand and diagnose the infection. The new variants - delta, then omicron, which appeared in November 2021 and then their sub-variants BA.2, then BA.4 and 5, and more recently BQ.1 and the sub-variant XBB.1.5 are increasingly transmissible and responsible for some degree of immune escape. Hence the importance of a better understanding of infection- or vaccine-induced immunity in order to optimize existing prophylactic or therapeutic strategies, or even to develop new, more effective ones. Mucosal immunity could play a particularly important role in interrupting the infection cycle at the entry point of the virus. The key role of innate immunity has been demonstrated in particular, via interferons and the composition of the microbiota. Humoral immunity is the best documented. However, it tends to be eroded within a few months. On the other hand, cellular immunity is more stable over time and would largely explain the decrease in severe forms of the disease in vaccinated individuals. The collection of biological resources that will be built up during this study will also allow us to optimize or develop new diagnostic methods, necessary as a complement to vaccination, to effectively slow down the spread of the pandemic and reduce the severity of its impact on the population. The improvement of diagnostic methods will in turn improve the understanding of the infection by providing increasingly reliable information on the characteristics of an infection, its quantification, its dynamics, and its resolution, especially since these parameters will be compared, at any time during the study, with reference methods and the immunological status of the subject. The main significant improvements expected in the field of SARS-CoV-2 diagnosis are notably the improvement of performance (reduction of false negatives in RT-PCR on nasopharyngeal samples), acceptability, simplicity of implementation in the field, and the capacity to test transmission. The objective of this study is to identify and characterize SARS-CoV-2 infection and host response, particularly mucosal immunity.
This study is a randomized controlled trial (RCT) to evaluate outcome after toe amputation due to diabetic foot infection. Aim of this RCT is to evaluate wound healing and functional outcome based, whether wound is closed or left open. As a part of this study, emerging technology of thermal imaging is evaluated as a possible tool to predict complication after amputation.
Role of immunonutrition in modulating the lung microbiota of intubated TBJ patients and how this interaction may affect the infections and outcomes. For these reasons, the aims of our study are the evaluation of the impact of immunonutrition on the lung microbiota and the relationship between lung microbiota and infection in TBJ patients in ICU.
Orthognathic surgery describes a group of procedures aimed at correcting developmental or acquired deformities of the jaws and facial skeleton. The goal of these procedures is to improve speech, jaw and dental function, aesthetics, and symptoms of sleep apnea. This is accomplished by surgical repositioning of the upper jaw (maxilla) and lower jaw (mandible). The most common procedures are lefort I osteotomies (upper jaw repositioning) and bilateral sagittal split osteotomies (lower jaw repositioning). At our institution, almost all cases include one or both of these two procedures. The majority of cases include bilateral sagittal split osteotomies (BSSO). As access to the jaws is through the oral cavity, these procedures are considered to be clean-contaminated surgeries due to the high intra-oral bacterial load. The result is that surgical site infections (SSIs) occur in 10-15% of cases. Studies show that the vast majority of these infections occur in the lower jaw (BSSO sites), presumably due to pooling of saliva and debris. SSIs are associated with patient discomfort, prolonged hospital stays, increased morbidity, and increased cost to healthcare systems. The use of peri-operative antibiotics has been shown to significantly reduce the incidence of SSI following orthognathic surgery. There is currently no consensus on the dosing or specific antibiotic to be used. There is strong evidence that pre-operative antibiotics significantly decrease SSI compared to no antibiotics. However, to date, there is no good evidence to support the use of post-operative antibiotics to further decrease the rate of infection. Several studies have examined the use of post-operative antibiotics ranging between 1-7 days. The majority of studies were not able to demonstrate a statistically significant difference to justify the use of post-operative antibiotics. A systematic review by Danda and Ravi in 2011 suggested that there likely is a benefit to the use of post-operative antibiotics. Danda and colleagues in 2017 later conducted a trial comparing pre-operative antibiotics alone compared to pre-operative combined with post-operative antibiotics. A statistically significant difference was not found, however, they felt that this was due to a limited sample size. Overall, there is no robust data that supports the use of post-operative antibiotics. The World Health Organization guidelines currently recommend against the use of post-operative antibiotics in orthognathic surgery. However, they do comment that there is some weak evidence that suggests its use. It was deemed that this low quality evidence did not outweigh the potential harm of antimicrobial resistance, which results from inappropriate overuse of antibiotics. Antimicrobial resistance is a serious, growing problem which has deadly consequences. Our current protocol at the QEII Health Sciences Center for peri-operative antibiotic administration is a single pre-operative dose of 2g cefazolin IV, followed by further doses every 8 hours post-operatively for a total of 24 hours (3 post-operative doses). Our study aims to investigate whether there is a need for these additional post-operative doses. If there is a benefit to these additional doses, the research team aims to investigate whether this benefit outweighs the risks. This question is of great importance in order to avoid an unnecessary contribution to antibiotic resistance and unnecessary potential adverse effects. Participants will be assigned a study number and randomly allocated to one of two groups. Group A will receive a single pre-operative dose of 2g IV cefazolin. Group B will receive a pre-operative dose of 2g IV cefazolin, followed by an additional three doses post-operatively every 8 hours for a total of 24 hours. Informed consent will be obtained at each participant's pre-operative assessment in the days leading up to the procedure. The participant will then select a group designation from a sufficiently mixed jar, and group A or B will be assigned to their study number. For each patient, the procedures completed will be documented, along with age, sex, smoking status, length of procedures, and complications. Complications including medication adverse reaction (allergy, toxicity, side effects), surgical complications, and any other significant complications related to the medications or deemed to be relevant to infection risk will be documented. Procedures will be carried out in the standard fashion. Patients will receive the same post-operative instructions and will be discharged with a chlorhexidine mouth rinse to be used for two weeks. Patients will return for follow-up at 2 weeks, 4 weeks, and 6 weeks post-operatively. Surgical site infection diagnosis will be made according to the CDC criteria and will be reported as either superficial, deep, or organ/space infections. Date of occurrence, location of infection, and treatment provided will be recorded on a standard form provided to surgeons.
The goal of this clinical trial is to learn whether showering with surgical drain tubes in place after first stage breast reconstruction causes increased risk of infection. The main questions it aims to answer are: - Is there an increased risk of infection/complications with showering 48 hours after drain tubes are in place - Does showering after 48 hours with drain tubes in place affect quality of life.
The epidemiology of H. pylori infection among children in Slovenia has not been investigated. Therefore, we are conducting a study to examine the epidemiology of H. pylori and associated risk factors among children in Slovenia.
This prospective case-control study aims to evaluate the immune function and find PD-1 antibody efficacy predictors on Chronic Active Epstein-Barr Virus Infection and Epstein-Barr virus-associated hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis by detecting lymphocyte subsets proportions in peripheral blood mononuclear cells and the positive proportion of PD-1, PD-L1 and other indicators in each lymphocyte subsets in healthy people and patients using flow cytometry before and after the initial PD-1 therapy.