View clinical trials related to Infection, Surgical Site.
Filter by:The goal of this randomized control trial is to investigate the superiority of 5 days (extended) versus a single dose of cefazolin prophylaxis in revision arthroplasty of the hip and knee. The main question[s] it aims to answer are: - Is an extended regimen compared to a single dose of cefazolin associated with an increased infection-free implant survival within one year after index revision arthroplasty of the hip or knee? - What are the incidence, risk factors, treatment outcome and prognosis of surgical site infections and periprosthetic joint infection during follow-up? - What is the safety and tolerance of the antimicrobial prophylaxis regimens used? - What are the antimicrobial susceptibility patterns of micro-organisms causing PJI during follow-up? - What is the patient' physical performance and satisfaction of subjects within 1 year after the index revision arthroplasty, using patient related outcome measurements (PROMS)? [question 2] Participants will [describe the main tasks participants will be asked to do, treatments they'll be given and use bullets if it is more than 2 items]. If there is a comparison group: Researchers will compare [insert groups] to see if [insert effects].
The study evaluates the efficacy of fluorescence-guided de-colonization in patients with non-infected diabetic foot ulcers. The efficacy will also be compared between those who used artificial dermis and split-thickness skin graft for reconstruction surgery.
Purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy of intravenous and intraosseous antibiotic administration techniques during tourniquetless total knee arthroplasty.
The investigators will perform two concomitant RCTs, depending on the presence of infected osteosynthesis material at enrolment: - SALATIO 1. Infected implant not removed (or new material inserted): Randomization 6 vs. 12 weeks (+/- 5 days) of total antibiotic therapy counted since the first debridement for infection. Early switch to oral targeted therapy. - SALATIO 2. Infected implant without residual material (definitive removal or within the interval of a two-stage exchange): Randomization 3 vs. 6 weeks (+/- 5 days) of total antibiotic therapy counted since the first debridement for infection. Early switch to oral targeted therapy.
The present study is designed to reveal effectiveness of hyaluronidase and dexamethasone on reduction of postoperative edema, pain, trismus, and infection. For this purpose, 60 participants with symmetrical mandibular wisdom teeth enrolled the present study. All measurements and evaluations were performed before and 1, 2, 3, and 7 days later the operation.
Chronic mesh infection mesh is a complication with leads to a long hospital stays, reoperation and admissions through emergency department. Surgical site infection (SSI) after removal are 58-72.7% depending on the published series. New therapeutic lines are needed in order to improve outcomes after surgery such as negative pressure therapy. The main objective is to determine the SSI differences depending on the use of negative pressure therapy after infected mesh removal. Material and methods: multicentric, prospective, randomized and an open comparative study. Patients will be selected sequentially n=94. Each selected patient will be randomized in two groups: conventional closure of the surgical wound vs. negative pressure therapy with a 30-day follow-up.
MolecuLight is a device that utilizes a special light which, when used on wounds, helps identify the regions which pathogenic bacterial counts are the highest. The device applies 405nm violet light which is harmless to the human tissue. When specific components in bacteria catches up the light, a photoluminescent reaction is triggered and the fluorescence light is caught by the camera on this device in real time. When treating an infected wound which requires debridement and/or reconstruction, traditionally surgeons rely on many clinical clues to judge the severity and region of infection. However, these clues, such as lab data, vital signs, bacterial culture growth, or infection symptoms/signs, are usually indirect and also require several days to be fully interpretated. The advantage of MolecuLight is its simple, direct, real-time, and flexible application, which is very important and valuable when treating an infected wound. We aim to add this device to our routines and see if the treatment course for these wounds can be more rapid and effective, and also utilize the countless potential of immediate bacterial identification in numerous aspects of our work.
Patients randomly aligned in 2 groups.Vicryl plus sutures were used in group 1 for closing subperiostal flaps after dental implant surgeries and vicryl sutures were used in group 2.