View clinical trials related to Infection, Surgical Site.
Filter by:The study evaluates the efficacy of fluorescence-guided de-colonization in patients with non-infected diabetic foot ulcers. The efficacy will also be compared between those who used artificial dermis and split-thickness skin graft for reconstruction surgery.
Purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy of intravenous and intraosseous antibiotic administration techniques during tourniquetless total knee arthroplasty.
The investigators will perform two concomitant RCTs, depending on the presence of infected osteosynthesis material at enrolment: - SALATIO 1. Infected implant not removed (or new material inserted): Randomization 6 vs. 12 weeks (+/- 5 days) of total antibiotic therapy counted since the first debridement for infection. Early switch to oral targeted therapy. - SALATIO 2. Infected implant without residual material (definitive removal or within the interval of a two-stage exchange): Randomization 3 vs. 6 weeks (+/- 5 days) of total antibiotic therapy counted since the first debridement for infection. Early switch to oral targeted therapy.
The present study is designed to reveal effectiveness of hyaluronidase and dexamethasone on reduction of postoperative edema, pain, trismus, and infection. For this purpose, 60 participants with symmetrical mandibular wisdom teeth enrolled the present study. All measurements and evaluations were performed before and 1, 2, 3, and 7 days later the operation.
Chronic mesh infection mesh is a complication with leads to a long hospital stays, reoperation and admissions through emergency department. Surgical site infection (SSI) after removal are 58-72.7% depending on the published series. New therapeutic lines are needed in order to improve outcomes after surgery such as negative pressure therapy. The main objective is to determine the SSI differences depending on the use of negative pressure therapy after infected mesh removal. Material and methods: multicentric, prospective, randomized and an open comparative study. Patients will be selected sequentially n=94. Each selected patient will be randomized in two groups: conventional closure of the surgical wound vs. negative pressure therapy with a 30-day follow-up.
MolecuLight is a device that utilizes a special light which, when used on wounds, helps identify the regions which pathogenic bacterial counts are the highest. The device applies 405nm violet light which is harmless to the human tissue. When specific components in bacteria catches up the light, a photoluminescent reaction is triggered and the fluorescence light is caught by the camera on this device in real time. When treating an infected wound which requires debridement and/or reconstruction, traditionally surgeons rely on many clinical clues to judge the severity and region of infection. However, these clues, such as lab data, vital signs, bacterial culture growth, or infection symptoms/signs, are usually indirect and also require several days to be fully interpretated. The advantage of MolecuLight is its simple, direct, real-time, and flexible application, which is very important and valuable when treating an infected wound. We aim to add this device to our routines and see if the treatment course for these wounds can be more rapid and effective, and also utilize the countless potential of immediate bacterial identification in numerous aspects of our work.
Patients randomly aligned in 2 groups.Vicryl plus sutures were used in group 1 for closing subperiostal flaps after dental implant surgeries and vicryl sutures were used in group 2.