View clinical trials related to Infected Wound.
Filter by:Slough was a visible indicator of biofilm, which was the most available specimen from acute and chronic wounds. However, studies believed that slough were poorly accurate, and that the Levine swab was more recommended for sampling bacterial culture. This study aimed to compare slough with swab sample and analyze the consistency.
This is a multi-center, pragmatic, parallel arm randomized controlled trial (RCT) of 352 patients with high-risk open or closed tibial plateau fracture, high-risk open or closed tibial pilon fracture, or open tibial shaft fracture with incision >3cm. Eligible participants will be randomized to receive either incisional negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) or a non-suction standard-of-care wound dressing for their definitive wound management. The primary outcome will be a composite outcome to evaluate clinical status 3 months after randomization. The secondary outcomes will independently assess the components of the primary outcome.
This is a Phase III clinical randomized control trial to investigate differences between patient with an infected nonunion treated by PO vs. IV antibiotics. The study population will be 250 patients, 18 years or older, being treated for infected nonunion after internal fixation of a fracture with a segmental defect less than one centimeter. Patients will be randomly assigned to either the treatment (group 1) PO antibiotics for 6 weeks or the control group (group 2) IV antibiotics for 6 weeks. The primary hypothesis is that the effectiveness of oral antibiotic therapy is equivalent to traditional intravenous antibiotic therapy for the treatment of infected nonunion after fracture internal fixation, when such therapy is combined with appropriate surgical management. Clinical effectiveness will be measured as the primary outcome as the number of secondary re-admissions related to injury and secondary outcomes of treatment failure (re-infection, nonunion, antibiotic complications) within the first one year of follow-up, as defined by specified criteria and determined by a blinded data assessment panel. In addition, treatment compliance, the cost of treatment, the number of surgeries required, the type and incidence of complications, and the duration of hospitalization will be measured.
The key purpose of this study is to determine and understand the safety and effectiveness of blue light phototherapy in the treatment and healing of infected diabetic wounds, as well as determining if this treatment is capable of reducing the bacterial population number within infected wounds. The investigators' lab recently discovered that a specific survival protein called catalase can be destroyed through blue light exposure. Given that a majority of bacteria species contains catalase, it is hypothesized that the destruction of this protein can improve the effectiveness of antimicrobial wound dressings commonly used to treat infected diabetic wounds, therefore further reducing the amount of bacteria within the wound and increasing the rate of healing. By reducing the overall bacterial population within these diabetic infected wounds, the ability for these diabetic wounds to heal will be enhanced, allowing for greater reductions in wound size over the course of the treatment. In this study, 40 subjects will be enrolled and randomly assigning subjects to either a control group or a phototherapy receiving experimental group. While control subjects will receive standard weekly debridement treatment procedures for infected diabetic ulcers, experimental subjects will receive standard weekly debridement treatment alongside 2 sessions of phototherapy every week over the course of 12 weeks. Bacterial swab samples will be taken alongside the excised debrided infect tissue for the purpose of bacterial population analysis. For each patient, the changes in total bacterial population, wound size, and subject satisfaction will be recorded and analyzed to determine the effectiveness of pulsed light phototherapy.
This study evaluates the current surgical practices at Ayder Comprehensive Specialized Hospital in comparison to the World Health Organization's Surgical Unit Based Safety Programme guidelines and aims to determine how deviations from those guidelines are associated with varying rates of surgical site infection incidence in this population. The results of this study will help elucidate risk factors for surgical site infection and prioritize future interventions to decrease the rate of surgical site infection at Ayder Comprehensive Specialized Hospital, as well as other low and middle-income hospitals. The data collected regarding surgical site infection rates will also prove beneficial in measuring outcomes of any interventions that are developed as a result of this study.
Bowel cancer is the second most common cause of cancer-related death in the UK, with 50,000 new cases and over 15,000 deaths annually. Surgery is the mainstay of treatment and the most common complications are an infection of the wound or lungs. These can lengthen hospital stay, reduce the quality of life, and even increase the risk of death. Bowel cancer patients are often malnourished. Optimising nutrition with supplements such as fish-oils can improve the immune response of patients, helping prevent such complications, shorten hospital stay, improve quality of life and overall survival.
Klorsept is a debridement solution of necrotic infected tissue promoting wound healing. The aim of this study is to elaborate the effectiveness and safety of this solution.