View clinical trials related to Induction of Labor.
Filter by:Induction of labor is an increasingly used intervention in obstetrics due to expanding indications, which more often includes relatively healthy women with uncomplicated pregnancies. While induction of labor traditionally is offered in an inpatient setting, a shift towards an outpatient setting is increasing despite insufficient evidence regarding safety and effectiveness. Oral misoprostol is easy for the pregnant women to administer and the risk of uterine hyperstimulation with fetal heart rate changes is found to be low. Strong evidence concludes that oral misoprostol is preferable as an induction agent and is recommended by the World Health Organization (WHO). The investigators will perform a multicenter randomized-controlled trial comparing labor induction in an outpatient versus inpatient setting, aiming to increase knowledge on outpatient induction of labor with oral misoprostol. The study is based on experiences and findings from a recently performed pilot trial and targets a large group of relatively healthy pregnant women where induction of labor is decided. The investigators hypothesize that women induced in an outpatient setting will be more satisfied than women induced in an inpatient setting.
AIM: To evaluate effectiveness and safety of titrated oral misoprostol solution (OMS) in comparison with static-dose oral misoprostol solution for induction of labor at term. Women with singleton live pregnancy at term without any complications who were admitted in labor room for induction of labor were enrolled. Study involves allocation of selected women in two groups randomly and use of either titrated or static oral misoprostol dose regimen to induce labor. Possible benefits included rapid induction of labor with oral drug regimen which is easier to comply as compared to vaginal regimens. Women were at risk of all the complications associated with induction of labor like labor abnormalities, risk of cesarean section, non reassuring fetal status.
The goal of this observational prospective study is to assess the change in Dilapan-S rod diameters using transvaginal ultrasound over a period of 12 hours in term women undergoing induction of labor.
Objectives- To compare changes in labour-associated maternal and fetal hormone levels during breast stimulation, balloon induction and spontaneous labour. To compare efficacy and safety of labour induction methods in women with previous caesarean section. Design- Participants were randomized to undergo induction of labour by breast stimulation or intracervical balloon compared to spontaneous labour (controls). Setting- A single tertiary hospital Population- women at term, with previous caesarean section
The goal of this study is to compare cook catheter placement for 6 vs. 12 hours to see if there is faster time to delivery for people admitted to labor and delivery undergoing induction of labor.
Term pregnancies within their 37-41 gestational week, who were planned to undergo induction of labor, were included in the study. Prior to initiation of the induction of labor, all included pregnant women underwent an assessment of Doppler flow indices, which included fetal umblical artery PI (pulsatility index) and fetal middle cerebral artery (MCA:Middle cerebral arter) PI. Cerebroplacental Ratio (CPR) was calculated by dividing MCA PI value to umbilical artery PI (MCA PI/UA PI=CPR).Included pregnant women were categorized as Group 1 and Group 2, which comprised of those with CPR value below 1.0 and above 1.0, respectively. Route of delivery and fetal complications, described as umbilical cord pH<7.20, APGAR score at 5 minutes <7, meconium aspiration syndrome, newborn intensive care unit admission, neonatal sepsis and neonatal death.
Combined misoprostol and Foley bulb catheter has been shown to be an effective induction method. However, optimal route of administration for misoprostol has not been established. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to compare the effectiveness and safety of combination buccal miso-foley to combination vaginal miso-foley for third trimester cervical ripening and induction of labor.
Nowadays, more and more women embark on pregnancy with previous Caesarean scar. One in five pregnancies requires induction of labour. The use of non-pharmacological methods (methods without using medication) has been gaining popularity for women who are not good candidates, such as women with previous Caesarean scar, for induction with medications such as prostaglandin. Labour induction with prostaglandin carries a higher risk of uterine rupture and thus it is not routinely offered to women with previous Caesarean delivery in Cairo University Hospital. Non-pharmacological methods of induction of labour appear to be safe in women with previous Caesarean delivery. However, various methods are available and the efficacy among them remain in doubt.
The primary objective of the trial is to assess the following: In women who have undergone cervical preparation with oral misoprostol as part of labour induction for hypertensive disease in India, is augmentation using oral misoprostol superior to the standard protocol of intravenous oxytocin?
This study evaluates the need of oxytocin therapy in active phase of labor. there will be two groups treating with oxytocin in latent phase.One group will be treated with low dose oxytocin therapy and the other group will be treated with high dose oxytocin therapy. oxytocin treatment will be ceased at the beginning of the active phase of labor. the need of oxytocin treatment in active phase of labor will be compared between two groups.