View clinical trials related to Induction of Labor.
Filter by:Evaluation of efficacy of inducing labour using a Foley's catheter and low dose oral misoprostol sequentially, in comparison with low dose oral misoprostol alone.
The aim of this study is a comparison of induction of labor with a cervical ripening balloon left in place for one hour compared to twelve hours. The primary outcome is time to delivery. Women admitted for induction of labor will be recruited and randomized to either a cervical ripening balloon for one hour or twelve hours. the management of delivery after the extraction of the balloon will be left to the discretion of the attending physician.
Cervical ripening should be present before labor induction, which can generally be divided into two categories: pharmacological and mechanical
The objective of the study is to cross-culturally adapt and validate the French version of the EXIT scale: an assessment tool on induction of labor.
Induction of labor is one of the most common obstetrical medical procedures performed today. Iatrogenic stimulation of uterine contractions prior to the onset of spontaneous labor is undertaken for various maternal and fetal indications and spans 20% of deliveries today. 1. During the past years there has been an additional rise due to elective inductions 2. Induction is undertaken when potential risks of prolonging pregnancy outweigh the risks of induced delivery, particularly those associated with post-term pregnancy, rupture of membranes, oligohydramnios and additional fetal and maternal conditions that pose risks to mother and fetus. In many circumstances of women with an unfavorable cervix (Bishop score of 7 or less) sequential induction with more than one agent is necessary. To date, no trial has compared the optimal subsequent ripening method after the preliminary use of dinoprostone (prostaglandin E2). In this trial investigators aim to compare the obstetrical outcomes of subsequent induction in women admitted for induction of labor with Bishop score <7 or less 24 hours after the insertion of vaginal prostaglandin insert (Propess). Two methods of routine induction of labor will be compared: An additional Propess induction for another 24 hours vs. intravenous oxytocin infusion combined with intra-cervical balloon insertion.
The equipoise whether to Induce pregnant women with suspected large for gestational babies or suspected macrosomia babies at term pregnancy is not solved yet. Only 2 relatively small studies were conducted to answer this clinically important question. The investigators will conduct a randomized controlled, multi-center study large enough to confirm or refute our assumption that induction of labor at term reduces the shoulder dystocia prevalence significantly compared to expectant management.