Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Summary

The primary objective of the trial is to assess the following: In women who have undergone cervical preparation with oral misoprostol as part of labour induction for hypertensive disease in India, is augmentation using oral misoprostol superior to the standard protocol of intravenous oxytocin?


Clinical Trial Description

Every year approximately 30 000 women die from hypertensive disease in pregnancy. Magnesium sulphate and anti-hypertensives reduce morbidity, but delivery is the only cure. Low dose oral misoprostol, a prostaglandin E1 analogue, is a highly effective method for labour induction. Usually, once active labour has commenced, the misoprostol is replaced with an intravenous oxytocin infusion. However, some studies have shown that oral misoprostol can be continued into active labour. In the Cochrane review on labour induction, those whose augmentation was continued with misoprostol (M/M protocol) had 42% less CSs than those who changed to oxytocin (M/Ox protocol; 15% vs 26%). This misoprostol-only protocol would be simpler and probably more acceptable to women. However, these two protocols have never been directly compared. We propose a pragmatic, open-label, randomised trial to compare an M/M labour induction protocol with the standard M/Ox protocol. ;


Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


NCT number NCT03749902
Study type Interventional
Source University of Liverpool
Contact
Status Completed
Phase Phase 4
Start date January 6, 2020
Completion date July 30, 2022

See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Completed NCT01127581 - Efficacy & Safety Study Comparing Misoprostol Vaginal Insert (MVI) Versus Dinoprostone Vaginal Insert (DVI) for Reducing Time to Vaginal Delivery Phase 3
Completed NCT01139801 - Cervical Ripening for Induction of Labor: Misoprostol Versus Oxytocin in Conjunction With Foley Balloon N/A
Active, not recruiting NCT06324279 - Cervical Sliding Sign to Predict Outcome of Induction of Labor
Recruiting NCT05864326 - Heated Saline in Cervical Balloon for Labor Induction, a RCT N/A
Active, not recruiting NCT06056141 - Induction of Labour at Term With Low Dose Oral Misoprostol Versus a Foley Catheter Phase 4
Completed NCT04529837 - Ultrasound Assessment of DILAPAN-S
Completed NCT02477085 - Methods of Labor Induction and Perinatal Outcomes
Completed NCT02098421 - Foley Labor Induction Trial at Term and in PROM Phase 1
Completed NCT03138252 - Study of the Effectiveness of Cervical Ripening Balloon With and Without Oxytocin Phase 3
Recruiting NCT01720394 - Efficacy of Induction of Labor on Term Using a Double Balloon Catheter Compared to Dinoprostone Vaginal-insert Phase 4
Completed NCT00451308 - Induction of Labor With a Foley Balloon Catheter: Inflation With 30ml Compared to 60ml Phase 4
Not yet recruiting NCT05511727 - Use of Single Versus Double Foley's Catheter in Pre-induction Cervical Ripening N/A
Recruiting NCT02762942 - Comparison of Vaginal Misoprostol Plus Supracervical Balloon Versus Vaginal Misoprostol Alone for Induction of Labor Phase 4
Completed NCT01283022 - Pharmacokinetic (PK) Study of the 200 Microgram (mcg) Misoprostol Vaginal Insert (MVI 200) in Women at Term Gestation (The MVI-PK Study) Phase 2
Recruiting NCT00684606 - Transcervical Foley Catheter With or Without Oxytocin for Induction of Labor N/A
Recruiting NCT05759364 - The Effect of IV PAPAVERINE 80 mg Prior to Catheter Balloon Insertion on Bishop Score and Pain N/A
Recruiting NCT03854383 - Using Isosorbide Mononitrate in Reducing Time in Induction of Labor in Post Date Women Phase 2
Completed NCT01428037 - Safety and Efficacy Study of Vaginal Misoprostol for Cervical Ripening and Induction of Labor Phase 3
Terminated NCT03752073 - Comparison of Two Mechanical Methods of Outpatient Ripening of the Cervix N/A
Recruiting NCT03045939 - Cervical Ripening With the Double Balloon Device for 6 Hours Compared With 12 Hours N/A