View clinical trials related to Hysterectomy.
Filter by:This is a prospective blinded, randomized controlled study. The study will include three study arms: Patients undergoing laparoscopic hysterectomies will be randomized to one of either "Ultravision" (study arm 1) or "no Ultravision" (study arm 2, i.e. the current standard of care) groups. The study will be conducted blinded to the investigator during the procedure through patient discharge. The Ultravision system will be present in both, with the generator covered (not seen by user) and either on or off depending on the randomization. 30 patients will be enrolled, 15 per group. Five patients undergoing myomectomy will have their procedures conducted using the Ultravision (study Arm 3). Ultravision is cleared for use in all laparoscopic surgery i.e. including laparoscopic hysterectomy and myomectomy, in the United States. However, the clinical benefits arising from its use in gynecology have not yet been quantitatively assessed and published in an independent medical journal. Study Purpose: There are three main study objectives 1. To evaluate the impact of use of Ultravision device during laparoscopic hysterectomy and myomectomy on the quality of visualization in the laparoscopic field 2. To evaluate the impact of use of Ultravision device during laparoscopic hysterectomy and myomectomy on procedural characteristics 3. To evaluate the impact of use of Ultravision device during laparoscopic hysterectomy and myomectomy on clinical outcomes.
Difference in outcome measures with the addition of post-operative evidence based bundle pre-operative education compared to standard pre-operative education given to patients prior to hysterectomy.
The objective of the study is to assess retrospectively the effect of an awareness-raising phase in favour of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery across the Assistance Publique-Hopitaux Paris institution and to explore the determinants of compliance with modalities of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery. This multicenter study is performed for three types of surgery: total knee arthroplasty, left colectomy and hysterectomy.
Minilaparotomy hysterectomy (MLH) relies on the simplicity of traditional open technique of abdominal hysterectomy, imparts cosmesis and faster recovery of laparoscopic hysterectomy yet avoids the long learning curve, cost of expensive setup and instrumentation associated with the minimally invasive approaches namely laparoscopy and robotics. In the present study, we tried to ascertain if the results obtained with MLH can be compared to LAVH in terms of its feasibility, intraoperative variables, and complications. The null hypothesis was that both MLH and LAVH are comparable techniques, so where cost and surgeon's experience are the confining issues, patients can be reassured that MLH gives comparable results.
Cystoscopy is a commonly performed procedure after gynecologic surgery, however, its use may increase patients' risk for acquiring urinary tract infections due to urinary tract instrumentation entry and reentry of the lower urinary tract with the cystoscope and foley catheter. Use of a novel multi-channel transurethral bladder catheter that allows for cystoscopy through a specialized port will permit cystoscopy to be performed without catheter removal. This may allow for intraoperative detection of urinary tract injuries with a reduction in both urethral manipulation and hospital-associated urinary tract infections. Other potential benefits may include a shorter procedure time and ease of use for providers.
Regional anesthesia, also know as a nerve block, is a key component of pain control after major abdominal surgery. Bilateral erector spinae plane block (ESPB) performed at low thoracic level has been shown to be an effective pain control method in case reports. This pilot study aims to further characterize the pain-control characteristics and to provide baseline data for future trials.
The primary indication for superior hypogastric (SHP) block is visceral pelvic pain, most commonly from malignancy of the ovary, uterus, cervix, bladder, rectum or prostate. Percutaneous SHP blocks should be done under guidance of ultrasonography, fluoroscopy, magnetic resonance or computed tomography. Because of the close proximity of SHP to major vessels, and structures like vertebral column (for posterior) and guts (for anterior) are being on the way of the needle, these percutaneous blocks are associated with serious complications. Performing SHP during hysterectomy surgery, gives advantages to rule out these complications by exploring the whole intraabdominal anatomy. The investigators' theory is to find out if SHP blocks (during pelvic surgery) are useful for decreasing VAS pain scores and opioid consumption for postoperative pain.
The primary indication for superior hypogastric plexus (SHP) block is visceral pelvic pain, most commonly from malignancy of the ovary, uterus, cervix, bladder, rectum or prostate. Per-cutaneous SHP blocks should be done under guidance of ultrasonography, fluoroscopy, magnetic resonance or computed tomography. During minimally invasive laparoscopic surgery, percutaneous technique can be done under the guidance of cameras.
This is a randomized controlled trial comparing pre-admission administration of routine oral preoperative non-narcotic analgesics with the administration of these medications in the pre-anesthesia care unit per our standard practice. Patients will be screened, enrolled, consented, and randomized during the preoperative office encounter, typically occurring within the 30 days prior to surgery. Patients randomized to pre-admission administration (study group) will be provided with a prescription for a one-time dosing of routine oral non-narcotic analgesic medications to be filled at the Cleveland Clinic outpatient pharmacy. Both the study and the control groups will receive written pre-operative instructions. Those patients randomized to the standard practice of administration in the pre-anesthesia unit (control group) will be administered the same medications in the same doses by the nursing staff. Patients in both groups will undergo general anesthesia, orogastric tube placement, and minimally invasive hysterectomy (MIH). Post-operatively, patient pain will be assessed via NRS at standard intervals and treated with narcotics. Amount of total intravenous (IV) and oral (PO) narcotics given during PACU stay will be documented in the medication administration record (MAR) within the electronic medical record (EMR) and later converted into oral morphine equivalents (OME). Pain will be assessed via NRS on discharge and documented. Patients will be emailed on POD10 a survey to rate their satisfaction with their medication administration regimen on a 5-point Likert scale. Participants will also be asked to complete a thirteen-point surgical recovery scale (SRS) to evaluate their functional recovery from MIH. Patient participation will conclude after completion of the patient satisfaction survey and SRS. A maximum of 58 patients will be enrolled into the study, as we aim to randomize 26 patients to each arm.
This is a randomized controlled trial to determine the influence of chlorhexidine gluconate surgical/topical antiseptic solutions on the bacterial environment of the vagina during hysterectomy and compare that to the effect of standard iodine-based preparations on the same.