View clinical trials related to Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure.
Filter by:Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS), marked by acute hypoxemia and bilateral pulmonary infiltrates, has undergone multiple definitions over the years. Challenges persist regarding the ARDS definitions, leading to various revisions. Through the Delphi study, the investigators aims to gather global opinions on the conceptual framework of ARDS, assess the utility of current and past definitions, and explore the role of subphenotyping. The diverse panel's collective expertise will contribute valuable insights for refining future ARDS definitions and enhancing clinical management.
This study targets adult patients treated with high flow nasal cannula (HFNC) at emergency department (ED) of Severance hospital, Yonsei university. Patients with acute hypoxic respiratory failure presenting to the ED receive conventional oxygen therapy as initial treatment unless immediate endotracheal intubation is required. Partial rebreathing oxygen masks are mainly applied at first. If the patient's condition does not improve despite such treatment, the patient receives HFNC or endotracheal intubation. However, possible treatment range have not been studied, especially in ED. Decisions are made based on the personal experience of the medical staff in charge. Applying HFNC to patients who eventually fail can lead to delayed intubation and increased mortality. Failure prediction models such as ROX index and HACOR score have been developed due to such reasons. However, such models are mostly based on intensive care unit studies and after application of HFNC. Therefore, failure prediction model at the time before application of HFNC and efficacy of existing models in ED are necessary. This study is a prospective observational study and follows the standard treatment guidelines applied to the patient and the judgment of the attending physician during the patient's treatment process. Immediately before applying HFNC, the patient's respiratory rate, pulse rate, blood pressure, SpO₂, PaO₂, PaCO₂, GCS score are determined, and FiO₂ is measured above upper lips using oxygen analyzer(MaxO2+AE, Maxtec, USA). From these data, ROX index (SF ratio/respiratory rate), ROX-HR (ROX index/pulse rate), POX index (PF ratio/respiratory rate), POX-HR (POX index/pulse rate), and HACOR score (Heart Rate, Acidosis, Consciousness, Oxygenation, Respiratory rate) are calculated. The settings (flow rate, FiO₂, temperature) at the time of HFNC application are also measured. The same indices and HFNC settings are checked 30 minutes, 1 hour, 2 hours, 4 hours, 6 hours, and 12 hours after applying HFNC. Modified Borg score and comfort scale using 5-point Likert scale are additionally determined at 30 minutes for patient's comfort. Primary outcome is HFNC failure at 28 days, defined by endotracheal intubation. Other outcomes include intubation in ED and mortality at 28 and 90 days collected through phone interview. The receiver operating curve for ROX index, HACOR score, ROX-HR, and POX-HR at baseline, 30 minutes, 1 hour, 2 hours, 4 hours, 6 hours, and 12 hours are drawn for the outcomes. The area under the curve of the above indices are compared and cutoff values are chosen with maximum value of index J by the Youden's Index. A binary variable is created based on the cutoff values and multivariable logistic regression analyses are performed. Cutoff values for maximum specificity are also invested suggesting the lower limit of the indicator to which HFNC can be applied.
Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) can result in severe hypoxemic respiratory failure that ultimately may require invasive mechanical ventilation in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU). Although lifesaving, invasive mechanical ventilation is associated with high mortality, severe discomfort for patient, long-term sequelae, stress to loved-ones and high costs for society. During the ongoing pandemic high number of invasively ventilated COVID-19 patients overwhelmed ICU capacity. Non-invasive respiratory support, such as high flow nasal oxygen (HFNO) or non-invasive ventilation (NIV) have the potential to reduce the risk for invasive mechanical ventilation and in selected cases ICU admission. However, data from different studies are conflicting and studies performed in COVID-19 patients are of limited quality. Furthermore, identification of early predictors of HFNO/NIV treatment failure may prevent unnecessary delay of initiation of invasive ventilation, which may be associated with adverse clinical outcome. The development and validation of a prediction model, that incorporates readily available clinically data may prove pivotal to fine-tune non-invasive respiratory support. The overall aim of the NORMO2 project is to investigate the role and risks of HFNO and NIV to improve outcome in hospitalized hypoxemic COVID-19 patients.
The objective of ILAN is to assess the safety, feasibility and bronchodilator efficacy of in-line bronchodilator nebulizer delivery with VMN via HFNC system in hypoxemic respiratory failure patients treated with bronchodilators and compare this method to standard-nebulization using a jet nebulizer with a facial mask. The investigators hypothesized that aerosol nebulization using HFNC/VMN represents safer and more convenient approach in hypoxemic respiratory failure patients in comparison to conventional therapy while providing similar bronchodilator efficacy.
The aim of the study is to asses safety and indications and contraindications for performing bronchofiberocopy (FB) with respiratory support methods, i.e. non-invasive ventilation (NIV) and high flow nasal oxygen therapy (HFNO). Additionally, researchers want to determine how using these methods could avoid the risk of most common complications such as: hypoxemia-related events, decompensation of chronic respiratory failure, worsening of gas exchange, hemodynamic instability.
Critically ill COVID-19 patients with acute respiratory failure, in the intensive care unit (ICU), often feature high respiratory drive, determining large inspiratory efforts resulting in high pressures and global and regional over-distention, leading to lung injury. SARS-CoV-2 neurotropic-penetration in control centers in medulla oblongata might contribute to dysregulation and to excessively high respiratory drive observed in these patients. These pathophysiological conditions may often lead to the development of patient-ventilator asynchronies in aptients under mechanical ventilation, again leading to high tidal volumes and increased lung injury. These phenomena can contribute to prolonged duration of mechanical ventilation and ICU length of stay, but also can result in long term adverse outcomes like emotional/psychological and cognitive sequelae. All them compromising the quality of life of critically ill survivors after ICU discharge. The investigators will conduct a multicenter study in adult critically ill COVID-19 patients with hypoxemic respiratory failure, aiming to: 1) characterize incidence and clustering of high respiratory drive by developing algorithms, 2) apply artificial intelligence in respiratory signals to identify potentially harmful patient-ventilator interactions, 3) characterize cognitive and emotional sequelae in critically ill COVID-19 survivors after ICU discharge and 4) identify sets of genes and transcriptomic signatures whose quantified expression predisposed to asynchronies and cognitive impairment in critically ill COVID-19 patients.
In the context of postoperative hypertension in the intensive care units, or after resusitation of hypertensive patients, intravenous antihypertensive drugs are often used. Among those drugs, Nicardipine is an effective drug, but with side effects such as inhibition of pulmonary vasoconstriction. Only preclinical studies have investigated the pathophysiology of this mechanism, and no clinical study have proven its clinical relevance. The aim of this study is to establish the incidence of Nicardipine induced hypoxemia and to compare it to another antihypertensive agent, Urapidil.
Prone position (PP) is standard of care for mechanically ventilated patients with severe acute respiratory distress syndrome in the intensive care unit (ICU). Recommendations suggest PP durations of at least 16 hours. In 2020, COVID-19 pandemic led to a great number of patients requiring mechanical ventilation and PP in the ICU. Risk of ICU staff viral contamination and work overload led to prolongation of PP duration up to 48 hours. Here investigators report outcomes of prolonged PP sessions in terms of skin complications (pression injuries) and ventilatory improvement.
Multicenter, open label, three-arm randomized trial to assess the effect of helmet noninvasive ventilation vs. helmet continuous positive airway pressure vs. high-flow nasal oxygen on the rate of endotracheal intubation of patients with acute moderate-to-severe hypoxemic respiratory failure
Introduction: The main manifestation of COVID-19 pneumonia is acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), which in some cases can be more severe than intubation, extracorporeal membrane venous oxygenation (VV-ECMO) to ensure hematosis. Despite support from VV-ECMO, some patients may remain hypoxemic. One possible therapeutic procedure for these patients is the application of the prone position. Objective: The main aim of this study was to investigate the modification of the PaO2/FiO2 ratio, the compliance of the respiratory system in VV-ECMO with refractory hypoxemia. The secondary objective was to evaluate the safety and feasibility of the inclined position for ECMO. Methods: the investigators reviewed the electronic records and lists of all 23 COVID-19 patients. were placed for the first time in PP with an average duration of 16 h . patient characteristics, pre-ECMO characteristics, ventilator/ECMO settings, and changes in ventilator/ECMO settings and blood gas analysis before and after PP.