View clinical trials related to Hypoglycemia.
Filter by:The goal of the current study is to determine difference in glycemic control between traditional split mix regimen with Neutral Protamine Hagedorn (NPH) and regular insulin vs basal bolus regimen with glargine and humalog in a population of type 2 diabetes commonly encountered in the investigators county hospital setting which include newly diagnosed type 2 patients and patients on relatively high dose of insulin (dose >0.4 units/kg body weight. Primary outcome of the study is to determine differences in glycemic control between treatment group as measured by the mean daily blood glucose. Secondary outcome is to measure number of hypoglycemic events, number of severe hypoglycemia and length of hospital stay.
NULL HYPOTHESIS • There is no difference in the incidence of hypoglycemia among preterms receiving either two hourly 10% dextrose boluses or 10% dextrose infusion by burettes during the 72 hours of admission in Special Care Unit- Mulago Hospital. ALTERNATE HYPOTHESIS • Use of two hourly 10% dextrose boluses increases the incidence of hypoglycemia by 30% compared to 10% dextrose infusion by burettes among preterms admitted to Special Care Unit in the first 72 hours of admission.
Prior work suggests exposure to low glucose levels (hypoglycemia) is associated with increased cardiovascular risk. However, whether there is a causal relationship between cardiovascular events and hypoglycemia remains unclear with conflicting data in the literature. In this study, we plan to study whether acute exposure of patients to clinically relevant (50-60 milligrams/deciliter) levels of hypoglycemia induces or worsens blood vessel endothelial dysfunction- a key 1st step in the development of heart attacks and strokes. This will be determined in humans both with and with type 2 diabetes.
1. A prospective, non-interventional study, 125 patients with Diabetes Mellitus Type2 will be enrolled, who, while on metformin, have a sub-optimal glycemic control and who thus will receive additional treatment with a sulfonylurea (SU) derivative. At the start and at 3 and 6 months, during regular visits to the patient's General Practitioner, the patients will complete a series of questionnaires (Patient Reported Outcomes, PROs) directed at diabetes in general, at fear for hypoglycemia, at body weight, at treatment compliance and at general wellbeing. These PROs are the worry subscale of the Hypoglycaemic Fear Survey, Impact of Weight on Quality of Life, revised Diabetes Symptom Checklist, Problem Areas In Diabetes, EuroQol EQ-5D and Medication Adherence Report Scale. In total 75 questions. The frequency of hypoglycemic symptoms, incidence of hypoglycemic events and body weight changes will be assessed and the level of adherence to treatment will be investigated. 2. Diabetic patients, M/F, aged >35, metformin treated, serum HbA1c ≥7.0% (within last month), informed consent provided, in whom a SU therapy is added. Patients with Type 1 diabetes and with secondary diabetes will be excluded, and patients unable to understand and complete the questionnaires. 3. Primary outcome variables are outcomes from HFS-w and IWQOL in relation to the frequency of hypoglycemic symptoms and body weight at 6 months and to weight change from 0 to 6 months. Secondary outcome variables are the other PROs. The frequency of hypoglycemic symptoms, incidence of hypoglycemic events, changes in body weight and level of compliance will be addressed. 4. The Intention To Treat analysis will be used, with Last Value Extended Forward from 3 to 6 months in case of withdrawal after 3 months. Changes in outcome variables will be analysed by modelling time and potential dummy variables in a Generalized Estimating Equations analysis. 5. Secondary, outcomes in HFS-w and IWQOL are compared with self-reported hypoglycemic symptoms, incidence of hypoglycemic events, body weight and change in body weight from 0 to 6 months. Changes in all PRO's from 0 to 3 and 6 months, potential relationships between (changes in) the different questionnaires, such as with hypoglycemia symptoms, weight (changes) and treatment compliance will be evaluated. A search is done for baseline characteristics which predict outcomes and changes in PRO's, hypoglycemic symptoms, hypoglycemic events and weight changes.
The trial aims at measuring the safety and performance of the Hyposafe device.
To determine whether intraoperative tight glycaemic control can reduce postoperative infection, morbidity and mortality
This study will assess if Sitagliptin addition to metformin or glitazone is better than current sulphonylurea based treatments during Ramadan. The rationale is that Sitagliptin offers metabolic advantages primarily with the low incidence of hypoglycemia over current sulphonylurea based treatments.
The primary objective of this protocol is to test the safety and efficacy of a treatment regimen consisting of maintenance therapy with efalizumab and sirolimus for 1 year followed by withdrawal of efalizumab and maintenance therapy with sirolimus, for the prevention of the destruction and rejection of islet transplants in type 1 diabetic recipients. Genentech, the manufacturer of efalizumab voluntarily withdrew the drug from the U.S. market in April of 2009. Previously transplanted subjects have been transitioned to alternative immunosuppressives and no new subjects will be transplanted under this protocol.
Hypoglycemia and unawareness of hypoglycemia are major problems of insulin therapy in patients with diabetes mellitus. The long acting insulin analogue Detemir has structural and physicochemical properties which differ from human insulin. The aim of the present study is to test whether this leads to altered hormone and symptom response during hypoglycemia.