View clinical trials related to Hypertrophy, Left Ventricular.
Filter by:The purpose of this study is to determine the prevalence of Fabry mutations in patients with left ventricular hypertrophy (moderate to severe), as measured by echocardiography.This study is a screening study
This is a clinical, randomised, double-blinded study in which patients eligible for aortic valve replacement are enrolled. Patients receive infusion of either levosimendan or placebo 4 hours prior to surgery and until the end of surgery.
The Stenting of Renal Artery Stenosis in Coronary Artery Disease (RASCAD) study is a randomized controlled trial designed to evaluate the effect of renal artery stenting+medical therapy versus medical therapy alone on left ventricular mass progression and cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in patients affected by coronary artery disease and renal artery stenosis.
Purpose: The effect of intravenous glutamate infusion on myocardial diastolic function and overall hemodynamics were studied in patients undergoing elective aortic valve replacement with severe aortic stenosis and associated left ventricular hypertrophy . Methods: 25 patients will be included in this double-blind randomized placebo-controlled study. Glutamate was administered intravenously immediately after aortic cross-clamp release. The patients receive either a low dose of 30mg kg-1 h-1 (LG-group) or high dose of 60 mg kg-1 h-1 (HG-group) or placebo (P-group) at a rate of 3.3ml kg-1h-1 for 2h. Transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) is used to measure diastolic and systolic ventricular function before sternotomy (T0), and 2h (T2), 3h (T3) and 6h (T4) after release of cross clamp. Additionally routine hemodynamic parameters are measured intraoperatively.
Open-heart surgery causes injury of the heart muscle. Although this is usually mild, temporary and reversible, if it is severe it can endanger life and require additional high cost care. During surgery, techniques are used to protect the heart from injury, but these remain imperfect. Patients with a thickened wall of the heart (left ventricular hypertrophy) may be at greater risk. This study assesses the effect of facilitating sugar metabolism (a more efficient fuel) by the heart muscle using the drug Perhexiline given before the operation. This treatment has a sound experimental basis for improving outcome. If this improvement is confirmed surgical results could be improved. The investigators will be studying heart function, heart muscle energy stores and chemicals which quantify the amount of heart muscle injury. The investigators' hypothesis is that Perhexiline will improve the protection of the heart by decreasing damage that may occur during heart surgery.
Background: Angiotensin-converting-enzyme (ACE) inhibitors have a specific cardioprotective effect and, compared to treatment not directly interfering with the renin-angiotensin-system (RAS), significantly reduce cardiovascular (CV) mortality and morbidity in subjects with normal renal function. Despite CV events are the leading cause of death in these patients, no adequately powered trial so far evaluated the specific cardioprotective effect of ACE inhibitors in this population. Objectives: This prospective, randomized, open label, blinded end point (PROBE) trial is primarily aimed at evaluating whether, at comparable blood pressure (BP) control, ACE inhibitor as compared to non-RAS inhibitor therapy significantly reduces the incidence of a composite end point of CV death (including sudden death) and non-fatal myocardial infarction or stroke in 266 patients with arterial hypertension (pre-dialysis systolic/diastolic BP >140/90 mmHg or post-dialysis systolic/diastolic BP >130/80 mmHg or antihypertensive therapy) and/or echocardiography evidence of LVH (cardiac mass index >130 g/m2 for men and 100 g/m2 for women) who are on dialysis therapy since at least six months. Secondarily, the study will compare the incidence of single components of the primary outcome, new onset paroxysmal or persistent atrial fibrillation, thrombosis of the artero-venous fistula, new onset, progression or regression of LVH, changes in components of the metabolic syndrome, the safety profile of the two treatment regimens and their cost/effectiveness. Methods: After 1 month wash-out period from previous RAS inhibitor therapy and a baseline evaluation of main clinical and laboratory parameters, patients will be randomized on a 1:1 basis to 2-year treatment with an ACE inhibitor or a BP lowering regiment not including RAS inhibitors. A balanced distribution according to centre, number of dialysis sessions per week (2 or 3), presence of diabetes (YES/NO), arterial hypertension (YES/NO), LVH (YES/NO) will be achieved by the minimization method. Treatment will be adjusted to achieve and maintain a target BP <140/90 mmHg (pre-dialysis) and a target BP <130/80 mmHg (post-dialysis) in both groups. Expected results: ACE inhibitor compared to non-RAS inhibitor therapy is expected to reduce more effectively fatal and non-fatal CV events, prevent or limit progression or induce regression of LVH, improve some components of the metabolic syndrome, and reduce treatment costs for cardiovascular complications. These findings might help achieving more effective cardioprotection in people on chronic dialysis at lower costs.
This prospective, randomized, controlled study aims to evaluate the usefulness of the new body composition monitor (BCM) device as a method to improve volume control in hemodialysis (HD) patients and compare the results with those obtained by conventional volume control modalities.
The prevalence of Anderson - Fabry disease in patients with left ventricular hypertrophy is unclear. The investigators will examine urine - α - Galactosidase activity and globotriaosylceramide isoforms in these patients.
Evaluate pleiotropic effects of simvastatin in hypertensive patients.
Background: Recent data indicate that home nocturnal hemodialysis (8 hours of hemodialysis at home for 5-6 nights per week) may have substantial cardiovascular benefits, including regression of left ventricular (LV) hypertrophy, improved LV ejection fraction and blood pressure control. Nevertheless, this dialysis modality is only feasible in a highly-selected minority of ESRD patients, who can self-manage their dialysis treatment at home. In-centre nocturnal hemodialysis (INHD), administered as 7-8 hours of hemodialysis in hospital for 3 nights per week, represents an appealing and practical alternative. As this is a novel form of therapy, there has been no definitive study examining the cardiovascular impact of INHD to date. Objective: To determine the effects of INHD on LV mass, global and regional systolic and diastolic function, and other cardiovascular biomarkers in patients with ESRD. Hypothesis: Conversion from conventional hemodialysis to INHD is associated with favourable changes in cardiac structure and function in patients with ESRD. Rationale for Using Cardiac MRI: Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) has emerged as the new gold standard for measuring LV mass, volume, global and regional myocardial function. Its accuracy and precision make it the imaging modality of choice for studying the small number of patients currently undergoing or awaiting INHD. Study Design and Population: This is a prospective cohort study of adult ESRD patients who are currently receiving conventional in-centre hemodialysis and will be converted to INHD. Patients will be managed as per standard clinical practice (e.g. blood pressure, anemia management) established for the INHD program, and no therapeutic intervention will be performed as part of this study. All eligible patients will undergo two serial CMR examinations: within 2 weeks prior to conversion and at 52 weeks following conversion to INHD. We also plan to recruit a population of control patients who have elected to remain on conventional HD. These individuals will be asked to undergo the same set of investigations at baseline and 12 months thereafter. Outcome: The primary endpoints are the temporal changes in LV mass and size, global and regional diastolic and systolic function at 52 weeks after conversion to INHD, as measured by cardiac MRI. Secondary endpoints include changes in myocardial tissue characteristics, blood pressure, mineral metabolic parameters, anemia control, serum troponin, norepinephrine, brain natriuretic peptide, markers of inflammation and quality of life. Significance: The provision of an enhanced dialysis regimen has emerged as the most promising avenue through which to modify the dismal cardiovascular outcomes in patients receiving chronic hemodialysis. INHD represents a means of administering such therapy to a broad spectrum of dialysis patients for whom home therapies would not be feasible. The proposed study will be the first to precisely define the cardiac impact of INHD using CMR. The findings may justify large randomized controlled trials evaluating clinical outcomes. If INHD is proven to be effective, it will have a major impact on the management and outcome of many patients with ESRD in Canada.