View clinical trials related to Hypersensitivity.
Filter by:Allergy is a public health problem as more than 20% of western society is affected by it. Symptomatic treatment of allergy suffices with less severe allergy. Patients with more severe allergy should be treated with allergen immunotherapy (AIT). Present options of AIT are efficient but of long duration, associated with side effects and require much time from the patient. With Intralymphatic immunotherapy (ILIT), allergen is injected into the lymph node under ultrasound guidance. ILIT is complete after 3 treatment visits, may be more effective than and may have markedly fewer side effects than presently available methods of AIT. The investigators plan a randomized, parallel group, open-label, prospective case-control study to assess immunological changes in lymph node and peripheral blood after intralymphatic (ILIT) or subcutaneous (SCIT) immunotherapy with POLVAC. The intervention consists of one ultrasound-guided injection of allergen into inguinal lymph node or subcutaneous injection 1 cm next to the lymph node. Intervention quality (accuracy of injection) will be assessed by the administering physician during treatment and via video recording on the ultrasound device. Side effects associated with treatment will be recorded by the patients for 3 days after the injection. The effect of intralymphatic or subcutaneous injection on lymph node tissue and immunoglobulins E and G4 in serum as well as cellular analyses of lymph node tissue and peripheral blood will be determined in samples taken during the trial. The primary effect parameter is the effect of a single intralymphatic allergen injection on immunological parameters as well as allergen delivery to the lymph node as compared with a single subcutaneous injection.
The study aims to assess the effects of daily consumption of nutrients-fortified eggs on eczema condition in individuals with eczema. It is hypothesised that daily consumption of nutrients-fortified egg, which is rich in antioxidants, will improve eczema conditions in individuals with eczema as compared to consumption of regular eggs.
Antibiotic prophylaxis in the operating room reduces the frequency of occurrence of surgical site infections (SSI) by preventing bacterial proliferation. The main antibiotic used in all surgery is CEFAZOLINE. This antibiotic of the Beta-lactam family, and more precisely of the 1st generation cephalosporins, is active on a specific bacterial target, which is often the cause of surgical site infections. Patients known to be allergic to penicillin have a 50% higher risk of surgical site infection. The choice of antibiotic prophylaxis often comes up against the risk of allergy in anesthesia. In France in 2004, according to the INSERM database, 100 IgE-mediated immediate hypersensitivity reactions (IHR) were observed out of 1 million anesthesias. The attributable allergens in descending order were curares (60.6%), latex (5.2%) then antibiotics (18.2%), followed by dyes (3.5%), hypnotics, opioids, gelatins and local anesthetics were rarely found. Regarding allergy to antibiotics, the leading antibiotic for allergy in France is AMOXICILLIN, which accounts for 29% of drug-induced anaphylaxis. In view of the risk of cross-allergy, a history of allergy to AMOXICILLIN in the operating room is a contraindication to all beta-lactam antibiotics and therefore leads to an alternative choice to CEFAZOLINE when the latter was indicated for first-line antibiotic prophylaxis. However, this choice of alternative antibiotic to CEFAZOLINE is not without consequences. First of all, the alternative antibiotics Vancomycin and Clindamycin have a narrower spectrum and therefore may not cover all germs found in SSI. They do not cover Gram-negative organisms for Vancomycin and Gram-negative aerobes for Clindamycin. Moreover, the use of these antibiotics exposes to undesirable effects. They can promote the occurrence of nosocomial infections such as Clostridium difficile colitis, infections with resistant germs such as methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) or Vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus (VRE). Other adverse effects may occur such as Nephrotoxicity and Red Man Syndrome with Vancomycin. In addition, these antibiotics may be more difficult to handle, not allowing for the optimization of recommended delivery conditions. Secondly, the notion of the cost of these antibiotics must be taken into account. Two elements could encourage investigators to use CEFAZOLINE despite a history of allergy to AMOXICILLIN. 1. 1. Allergy declarations such as can be obtained in consultation correspond mainly to false positives. In fact, out of 10% of the world's population reporting an allergy to penicillins, only 1 to 2% of subjects have a proven allergy. In GHPSJ, among the patients consulting for a suspected allergy, the reintroduction test confirmed it in only 5.6% of them. 2. From a molecular point of view, there is a low rate of similarity between these two molecules. Contrary to popular belief, cephalosporin allergy is not mediated by the β-lactam core. The cross-allergy between cephalosporins and penicillin comes from the similarities of the R1 chain which is attached to the β-lactam nucleus at position 7 for cephalosporins, at position 6 for penicillins. This may therefore explain the lack of clinical cross-reactivity. The primary objective is to evaluate the proportion of patients of allergies between CEFAZOLINE and AMOXICILLINE. The secondary objectives are to evaluate the diagnostic value of skin tests to CEFAZOLINE and to describe the safety of protocol of reintroduction of CEFAZOLINE and AMOXICILLINE in the context of IgE-mediated cross-reactivity.
At present there is no cure for food allergy. People with a food allergy need to avoid the food they are allergic to in order to stay safe, but we know that accidental exposure is common. Researchers have begun to look at the effectiveness of 'oral immunotherapy' as a treatment for food allergy but results have been mixed. This study is a randomized controlled trial to evaluate the effectiveness of Fish Immunotherapy (FOIT), with codfish as the primary focus, in inducing tolerance in children with fish allergy compared with Placebo. Children will take increasing doses of codfish protein until a total of 12 months treatment is completed. Children will be tested for fish allergy at the start of the study, at the end of fish treatment T1 (12 months) and T2 (8 weeks) after treatment.
The investigators designed a prospective, 2-armed, cluster-randomized multicenter clinical trial on the effect of a by a digital application triggered intervention on quality of life and therapy-adherence among breast cancer patients, compared to standard of care.
IMGN853-0420 is a multicenter, open-label, phase 2 study of carboplatin plus mirvetuximab soravtansine followed by mirvetuximab soravtansine continuation in folate receptor-alpha positive, recurrent platinum sensitive, high-grade epithelial ovarian, primary peritoneal, or fallopian tube cancer following 1 prior line of platinum-based chemotherapy.
This pilot study trial will test the acceptability, feasibility, and usability of a brief enhanced anxiety sensitivity treatment to reduce anxiety sensitivity and functional impairment in Veterans.
The purpose of this study is to learn whether adding abemaciclib to abiraterone plus prednisone prolongs the time before prostate cancer gets worse. Participation may last approximately 60 months.
This phase II trial examines antiandrogen therapy interruptions in patients with hormone-sensitive prostate cancer that has spread to other places in the body (metastatic) responding exceptionally well to androgen receptor-pathway inhibitor therapy. The usual treatment for patients with metastatic prostate cancer is to receive hormonal medications including a medication to decrease testosterone levels in the body and a potent oral hormonal medication to block growth signals from male hormones (like testosterone) in the cancer cells. Patients whose cancer is responding exceptionally well to this therapy may take a break from these medications according to their doctor's guidance. This trial may help doctors determine if stopping treatment can allow for testosterone recovery.
This dose finding, multi-cohort study is designed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of intradermally-injectedTNX-2100, synthesized SARS-CoV-2 peptide antigens and assess the presence and magnitude of DTH reactions.