View clinical trials related to HIV.
Filter by:The primary objective of this study in antiretroviral (ARV)-naïve Human immunodeficiency virus 1 (HIV-1) ribonucleic acid infected subjects is to compare the response rate at Week 48 of a daily regimen of Atazanavir (ATV)/ Ritonavir (RTV)HS 300/100 mg combined with either one additional drug [Lamivudine (3TC) 300 mg daily] or 2 additional drugs [Tenofovir/Emtricitabine(TDF/FTC) 300/200 mg daily].
This study will evaluate how safe and tolerable a combination of taking three-drugs will be for the purpose of preventing HIV transmission after a high-risk sexual contact exposure in HIV uninfected adults.
To show the non-inferiority of EGRIFTA® vs. placebo in the development or progression of Diabetic Retinopathy in HIV-infected subjects with concomitant abdominal lipohypertrophy and Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).
The purpose of this observational, 10-year, prospective cohort study is to assess the potential safety concerns of long-term exposure to EGRIFTA® in HIV-infected subjects with abdominal lipohypertrophy compared with a similar group of subjects not exposed to EGRIFTA®.
The primary aim of this study is to determine the effects of the HIV integrase inhibitor, raltegravir, in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). This will be accomplished by collecting CSF before and after initiation of either raltegravir or another antiretroviral, efavirenz, each in combination with two other antiretrovirals. Assessments will include HIV RNA levels (viral load), neuropsychological testing, mood assessments, and quality of life assessments.
This is a Phase II multicenter, open-labeled, controlled, randomized study assessing weekly doses of Interleukin-7 (CYT107)
Respiratory infections have a high associated morbidity and mortality, especially in immunocompromised patients. To initiate effective treatment of respiratory infections, it is essential that a rapid and thorough laboratory analysis of respiratory specimens be performed, given the wide range of pulmonary pathogens that can be detected in this population. Conventional microbiology is time-consuming and cumbersome, and the capability of local laboratories to assess specimens for rare or unusual pathogens is often limited. This study will evaluate if a newer technology can be effectively utilized in the identification of a broader range of infectious agents relative to conventional procedures. Resequencing Pathogen Microarray (RPM) technology developed by TessArae , LLC which ceased operations in July 2014) uses a microarray chip to identify multiple pathogens in a clinical specimen. The technology has had limited clinical application, but early studies have shown its effectiveness in accurately identifying a large number of viral and bacterial organisms. In contrast to conventional microbiological procedures based on phenotypic traits (growth characteristic and enzymatic activity), this is microarray utilizes DNA sequence analysis to detect and identify the species, serotype/subtype, or strain of the infectious agent. Aliquots of respiratory specimens (initially, specimens collected by bronchoalveolar lavage, BAL) from 200 patients at the NIH Clinical Center and the Washington Hospital Center will be analyzed using the customized microarray chip. The specimens will be collected as part of the patients routine clinical care. The results of the TessArray microarray analysis will not be available to the clinician and therefore will not have any effect on the clinical care of the patients. The results of the microarray analysis from each site will be compared to that site s clinical laboratory results, and the data will be analyzed by site.
This study was designed to evaluate the pharmacokinetics of 20µg/kg/week of Interleukin-7 (CYT107), the biological activity and safety of repeated cycles of CYT107, for a maximum of 4 cycles within 21 months and a maximum of 3 cycles within 12 months.
- Peginterferon alfa-2a has been approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to treat adults with chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection with liver disease who have not been previously treated with interferon-alpha drugs (which improve immune system response to infection). Ribavirin has been approved by the FDA and is usually given in combination with interferon drugs such as peginterferon alfa-2a for treatment of chronic HCV. - Recent research shows that Latino whites do not respond as well to treatment with peginterferon alfa-2a and ribavirin as non-Latino whites. Various factors such as excessive weight, gender, and insulin resistance were evaluated to explain this difference, but research suggests that underlying factors related to Latino or non-Latino background, possibly genetic and immune differences, may be affecting the response to HCV infection and treatment. However, more research is needed on the effectiveness of peginterferon and ribavirin in Latino subjects with HCV, and with combined and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) co-infection. Objectives: - To evaluate the safety, effectiveness, and viral response of peginterferon alfa-2a and ribavirin therapy for chronic hepatitis C in Latino participants with and without HIV co-infection. This is an observational study. The observed treatment is received and managed through their primary care.
The purpose of this study is to look at two different antiretroviral treatment options in individuals who are about to commence their second antiretroviral treatment. This study will assess important clinical and laboratory differences between these two therapeutic options. Potential differences include: differences in body fat distribution, in lipid parameters, in adherence and in neurocognitive (brain) function. This study is looking to show differences in body fat distribution between the two study treatment arms. Differences in lipids, viral load, adherence, cardiac and bone biomarkers and neurocognitive function will also be assessed. There is also a lumbar puncture sub study participants can also take part in. The total duration of involvement in the trial will be up to 96 weeks (approximately 2 years) plus a screening visit 1 - 4 weeks prior to the start of the study. Including visit the clinic on 12 occasions (screening visit, baseline visit, weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, 48, 64, 80 and 96)