View clinical trials related to Hip Fractures.
Filter by:The purpose of this study is to determine if patients with hip fractures who undergo cryoablation of the PENG have improved pain control 30 days from surgery when compared to those who have a fascia iliaca catheter.
The purpose of this study is to look at how two different types of anesthesia, spinal and general, affect participants with broken hips who are getting a special kind of pain block before surgery. Researchers will check: - How quickly patients are ready for anesthesia - How long they stay in the recovery room after surgery - How much pain medicine they need during recovery - If they experience any confusion - If one group has complications in one of these anesthesia techniques? Participants in the study will be put into one of two groups by chance to see if there's a difference in their recovery.
The aim of this trial is to explore the efficacy of music in preventing delirium in elderly patients with hip fracture. The main aims of this research are: 1. To compare the effectiveness of music intervention in preventing delirium in patients with hip fractures through a randomized controlled trial. The comparisons include respiratory rate, pulse rate, blood pressure, and pain score, as well as the incidence and severity of delirium, opioid analgesic usage, postoperative complications, length of hospital stay, and rates of readmission within 14 days and 30-day mortality. 2. Introduce the evidence-based ''listening music protocol'' in the care of hip fracture patients to prevent delirium, and test the effects through a randomized controlled trial.
Our team has developed an AI software to guide the surgical protocol for femoral intertrochanteric fractures. This is a prospective randomized controlled clinical study that will include patients with femoral intertrochanteric fractures combining medial posterior and lateral wall fractures, and will randomly divide the patients into a traditional surgical protocol group and an AI-guided surgical protocol group. The efficacy and safety indexes such as operation time, blood loss, operation cost, infection rate, hospitalization time, postoperative pain score, fracture healing time, internal fixation failure rate and mortality rate were compared between the two groups to verify the efficacy and safety of AI-guided surgical treatment plan.
Our aim will be to compare the analgesic efficacy and safety of magnesium sulphate as an adjuvant to bupivacaine in pericapsular nerve group block in Hip joint surgeries. - Our primary outcome of the study: total amount of postoperative morphine consumption in the first 24h postoperative. - Our secondary outcome of the study: mean arterial blood pressure, heart rate, respiratory rate, adverse effects, block related complication, sedation score (by Ramsay sedation scale) and pain score (by Visual Analog Scale)
Analgesic drug study that will compare pain outcomes of opioid analgesia and opioid-free analgesia in post-operative orthopedic patients.
Patients with pelvic fragility fractures suffer from high morbidity and mortality rates. Despite the high incidence of these injuries, there is currently no regional or nationwide treatment protocol which results in a wide variety of clinical practice. New insights in treatment strategies, such as early diagnosis and minimal invasive operative treatment of these fragile patient population, has led to the development of several clinical pathways in recent literature. The aim of this study is to implement an evidence and experience-based treatment clinical pathway to improve the outcomes in this fragile patient population that currently has multifactorial risks for poor outcome.
The goal of this pilot, patient blinded randomized trial is to develop a mechanistic understanding of gait following fixation of unstable intertrochanteric hip fractures and return to function and pain control. The guiding hypothesis that will be tested in a subsequent clinical trial is that the InterTAN when compared to standard lag-screw cephalomedullary nails will have decreased post operative pain, earlier return to symmetric weight bearing, and quicker return to pre-injury functioning levels.
Why the investigators are doing this study? The best approach to rehabilitation after a broken hip is not known. A new approach could improve outcomes by tailoring rehabilitation to patient needs. This approach identifies subgroups of patients within a population who have different risks of poor outcomes. These subgroups are then matched to treatments better tailored to their needs. Survivors of a broken hip describe a tailored approach as key to recovery. Further, the NHS recommends this approach as central to healthcare progress. This study wants to see if it is possible for the NHS to deliver this new approach to rehabilitation for older adults who break their hip. What will be done? The investigators worked with patients to plan this study. Patients will keep helping the investigators during the study. Sixty older people who had surgery to fix a broken hip will be invited to take part. Participants will be given a level of risk (low, medium, or high) based on an online calculator (www.stratifyhip.co.uk). All 60 participants will get usual care provided locally. Half, selected by chance, will get extra rehabilitation during their hospital stay including a self-managed exercise programme for the low-risk subgroup, education, a goal-orientated mobility programme and enhanced discharge planning for the medium-risk subgroup, and education, a goal-orientated activity of daily living programme, orientation, and enhanced assessment for the high-risk subgroup. The investigators will collect information from the 60 people taking part, at the beginning, middle, and end of the study and again 12- weeks later. What will the next step be? If this small study shows this extra rehabilitation can be provided in the NHS, and it may help patients, then the investigators plan to do a larger study. The larger study will see if this extra rehabilitation works to help older people get back home and feel happier.
The surgical treatment of an individual with osteoarthritis and hip fracture is provided by hip replacement surgery. While restructuring the joint surfaces with surgery, it is aimed to provide both hip joint movements and to treat pain. Intense perioperative pain after hip replacement is common due to inflammatory agents and surgical intervention (eg, involvement of soft tissue and sensory nerves). Inadequately treated acute postoperative pain causes longer hospital stay, limited and delayed bed rest, decreased compliance with physical therapy, and an increased incidence of postoperative complications. It is thought that this method, which can be effective in the pain control of the patient, will be beneficial for the patient both physiologically and psychologically by reducing pain and discomfort. The most important advantage of TENS; It can be easily applied by nurses and easily taught to patients or families. The nurse has a great role in the follow-up of the patient after the surgery, as she/ he is with the patient for 24 hours. When the literature is examined, it is seen that the number of studies showing the effectiveness of TENS application in patients who underwent hip prosthesis, where studies were conducted with patients with knee gonarthrosis, is limited. In this direction, the aim of the study is to examine the effect of TENS application on patients' pain level and analgesic use in patients undergoing hip replacement.