View clinical trials related to Hip Fractures.
Filter by:Purpose The purpose of this study is to compare the clinical outcome and the rate of reoperations in a cohort of patients with undisplaced femoral neck fractures treated with internal fixation and patients with displaced femoral neck fractures treated with hip arthroplasty. Methods In a consecutive series of patients we compared the results of internal fixation for undisplaced femoral neck fractures with those of hip arthroplasty for displaced fractures (control group) of elderly patients. Risk of reoperation and patient reported hip function assessed with Harris hip score and WOMAC were used as outcome measurements.
Hip fracture is a frequent pathology, involving elderly patients with many co-morbidities ; therefore, post-operative morbidity and mortality is high. It is reported that intra-operative hemodynamics correlate with post-operative complications such as myocardial injury after non-cardiac surgery (MINS) or acute kidney injury (AKI) ; that is why elderly patients undergoing hip fracture surgery should benefit from a better hemodynamic stability. Low-dose hypobaric lateral spinal anesthesia with a reduced dose of local anesthetic has been shown to have better hemodynamic stability than conventional spinal anesthesia. It has also been reported that general anesthesia and conventional spinal anesthesia in elderly patients undergoing hip fracture surgery have the same hemodynamic effect. However, no published study has compared low-dose hypobaric lateral spinal anesthesia to general anesthesia with regards to hemodynamic effects. The aim of the present study is to compare the intra-operative hemodynamics of low-dose hypobaric lateral spinal anesthesia with that of general anesthesia in elderly patients undergoing hip fracture surgery.
Hip fracture surgery requires high risk anesthetic procedure for elderly patients (1). General anesthesia, continuous spinal anesthesia and peripheral nerve blocks are three anesthetic techniques possible. Continuous spinal anesthesia has proven its efficacity to provide an intraoperative haemodynamic stability wich guarantees good patients outcomes (2), in comparison with general anesthesia but there is poor evidence in the literature concerning the use of peripheral nerve blocks. The primary objective of this study was to compare intraoperative haemodynamic stability provides by peripheral nerve block versus general anesthesia and continuous spinal anesthesia. Secondary outcomes included : use of vasoactive drugs, opioids consumption, lengh of stay and inhospital mortality.
Recent studies have indicated a high incidence of postoperative periprosthetic femoral fracture in elderly patients treated with two commonly used cemented polished, tapered femoral stems. The aim of this study was to compare the prevalence and incidence rate of PPF in a cohort of elderly with femoral neck fractures (FNF) treated with either a collarless, polished, tapered stem (Exeter) or an anatomic matte stem (Lubinus SP 2). Patients and Methods In a multicentre retrospective cohort study 2529 patients 60 years and above, with a FNF as indication for primary surgery with a cemented hip arthroplasty were included. Patients were treated either with a polished tapered Exeter stem or a matte anatomic Lubinus SP12 stem according to the surgeons preference or to the praxis of the present department. The incidence of perprosthetic femoral fractures Hip-related complications and repeat surgery were assessed at a minimum follow-up of 2 years postoperatively.
This qualitative study is part of the 5-year long (2013-18) PERFECTED (Peri-operative Enhanced Recovery hip-fracture Care of paTiEnts with Dementia) National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) funded research programme. PERFECTED's overall aim is to develop and pilot an evidence-based intervention to improve the hospital care of patients living with dementia who have fractured their hip. The findings from this particular study will support PERFECTED's other activities by exploring stakeholder (lay and professional) views of the hospital care experiences of hip-fracture patients who are experiencing memory difficulties. Best practices and priorities, including attention to cost-consequences will be explored. Semi-structured interviews will be conducted with 15-30 hip-fracture patients with mild memory difficulties recently discharged from acute hospitals in Norwich, Nottingham and Bradford. Equal attention will be given to those patients discharged directly home and those discharged to community hospitals for further rehabilitation. Interviews will be conducted with 15-30 recognised carers of hip-fracture patients with moderate/severe memory difficulties who have recently been discharged from acute hospitals in the same three regions. Semi-structured interviews will also be carried out with a nominated dementia lead in each region. Finally, in each region, small focus groups, face-to-face or telephone interviews will be conducted, with clinical staff of various grades and professions, hospital managers and with NHS commissioners. This study will enable a range of topics and perspectives to be explored and potential components for PERFECTED's intervention to be identified. As part of PERFECTED's on-going commitment to Public Patient Involvement (PPI), lay researchers will be trained to assist in interviewing recognised carers of hip-fracture patients with moderate/severe memory difficulties. Interviews and focus groups will be recorded, transcribed and analysed thematically. Resulting data will address the pre-defined aims of the current study and feed into findings reported across the whole of Work Package 1 of PERFECTED.
Background Studies have shown that patients with hip fracture treated in a Comprehensive Geriatric Care (CGC) unit report better results in comparison to orthopaedic care. Furthermore, involving patients in their healthcare by encouraging patient participation can result in better quality of care and improved outcomes. To our knowledge no study has been performed comparing rehabilitation programmes within a CGC unit during the acute phase after hip fracture with focus on improving patients' perceived participation and subsequent effect on patients' function. Method A prospective, controlled, intervention performed in a Comprehensive Geriatric Care (CGC) unit and compared with standard CGC. A total of 126 patients with hip fracture were recruited who were prior to fracture; community dwelling, mobile indoors and independent in personal care. Intervention Group (IG): 63 patients, mean age 82.0 years and Control Group (CG): 63 patients mean age 80.5 years. Intervention: coordinated rehabilitation programme with early onset of patient participation and intensified occupational therapy and physiotherapy after hip fracture surgery. The primary outcome measure was self-reported patient participation at discharge. Secondary outcome measures were: TLS-BasicADL; Bergs Balance Scale (BBS); Falls Efficacy Scale FES(S); Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) and Timed Up and Go (TUG) at discharge and 1 month and ADL staircase for instrumental ADL at 1 month.
The purpose of the study is to investigate if using an electrical stimulation machine to see if it can help strengthen the muscles around the hip during the first three months post pelvic fracture will help with the early stages of rehabilitation. Electrical stimulation is a treatment machine that uses an electrical current to cause a single muscle or a group of muscles to contract. This contraction helps strengthen injured muscles and helps with the healing process. It can also help with pain relief by blocking pain signals from the brain. After a pelvic fracture they are surgically fixed and will be advised not to put any weight on the operated leg for 10 weeks. During this time hip muscles become very weak as they will not be used as much as normal. Bed exercises can help keep muscle strength but this study would like to try using electrical stimulation machines alongside bed exercises to see if it can improve muscle strength even more. Electrical stimulation machines are already used by rehabilitation. Electrical stimulation is a treatment machine that uses an electrical current to cause a single muscle or a group of muscles to contract. This contraction helps strengthen injured muscles and helps with the healing process. It can also help with pain relief by blocking pain signals from the brain. After a pelvic fracture they are surgically fixed and will be advised not to put any weight on the operated leg for 10 weeks. During this time hip muscles become very weak as they will not be used as much as normal. Bed exercises can help keep muscle strength but this study would like to try using electrical stimulation machines alongside bed exercises to see if it can improve muscle strength even more. Electrical stimulation machines are already used by patients to increase muscle strength. Participants will be put into one of two groups, both groups will be given an electrical stimulation machine but one will be on a placebo setting. Participants will need to use the machine twice a day along with their bed exercises and will need to fill in a diary when and how many times the machine has been used for 10 weeks until their 12 week appointment with the orthopaedic consultant. The participants weight bearing status will change and they will be asked to perform a muscle strength test on both the operated and nonoperated leg. They will also have their walking quality assessed. The results will compare both groups for muscle strength and walking changes.
This is a prospective, randomized study looking at the effect that a long-acting local anesthetic has on pain control in patients having surgery for hip fractures. The investigators are conducting the study to see if that reduces the amount of pain medicine needed after surgery, and if it reduces other medical complications after surgery.
Objectives: The acute care of pelvic fractures has improved recently however there are no formal guidelines for rehabilitation of these types of fractures. Patients have long periods of non-weight bearing causing muscle wastage. Neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) has proven to minimise muscle loss. However, this has not previously been investigated within this patient population. Design: Double blind, randomised, feasibility study. Setting: NHS trust hospital setting. Participants: Nine patients with surgically fixed pelvic fractures were randomly allocated at six weeks post fracture. Interventions: The intervention group completed six weeks of NMES. The placebo group used transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS). Main outcome measures: Peak torque (Nm) was calculated in the operated limb at 12 weeks using the non-operated limb as a baseline. Compliance and intensity levels were recorded. Feasibility of NMES was evaluated using a feasibility questionnaire. Pain was measured at six and 12 weeks using a visual analogue scale (VAS).
The investigators would like to investigate whether performing ultrasound assessments in patients undergoing surgery for hip fractures is able to identify previously undiagnosed heart or lung conditions. The investigators would like to determine whether information provided by this ultrasound assessment is significant enough to alter the anesthetic management plan of these patients. This study has the potential to demonstrate that ultrasound could be used as a diagnostic bedside tool in the perioperative period, possibly altering standard of care for this patient population.