View clinical trials related to Hip Dislocation.
Filter by:Patients with developmental hip dysplasia often present to the outpatient clinic in adulthood with hip pain due to progressive hip osteoarthritis. However, they may have complaints such as limping, lumbar lordosis, lower back pain, and leg length difference. Today, the best treatment option for these patients is hip arthroplasty. Hip arthroplasty causes a high rate of functional improvement and pain relief. According to the hip arthroplasty technique applied, improvement in lameness, leg length difference and spinal curvatures is expected. The aim of our study is to show the change in postoperative spine and lower extremity curvatures after hip arthroplasty in patients with advanced developmental hip dislocation.
This is a post-marketing surveillance on MiniMAX Stem
EUROSCUP Fixe is intended for use in primary and revision total hip replacement surgery. Hip replacement is intended to provide increased patient mobility and reduce pain by replacing the damages hip joint articulation in patients where there is evidence of sufficient sound bone to seat and support the components. As part of post market vigilance, EUROS will collect data on EUROSCUP Fixe performances and safety
This is a Post-Market Surveillance study of AMIStem-P femoral stem prosthesis
EUROSSTEM is intended for use in primary and revision total hip replacement surgery. Hip replacement is intended to provide increased patient mobility and reduce pain by replacing the damages hip joint articulation in patients where there is evidence of sufficient sound bone to seat and support the components. As part of post market vigilance, EUROS will collect data on EUROSTEM performances and safety
This Post Market Clinical Follow-Up (PMCF) study to evaluate the performance and safety of the cemented TrendHip® stem in a prospective follow-up study with patients who underwent a hip arthroplasty with the investigational product (representative of usual clinical practice), at two follow-up examinations
The purpose of this study is to determine if the utilization of Ischemic Pre-Conditioning 24-hours prior to hip arthroscopy decreases patient's post-operative pain and opioid consumption.
This study proposes to evaluate the efficacy of single shot erector spinae block (ESB) versus single shot quadratus lumborum block (QLB) when used in conjunction with continuous lumbar plexus block (LPB) for postoperative analgesia in children and adolescents undergoing unilateral hip surgical procedures. The aim of this study is to compare the efficacy of the QL vs. ESP blocks as supplements to the lumbar plexus block with respect to pain control outcomes after hip PAO surgery. Both blocks are safe and easy to perform. There is currently no comparative, prospective data concerning the use of these two blocks for hip surgery. The investigational hypothesis is that there will be no clinical difference in the amount of opioid consumed or the overall pain control offered by these two block options.
This study is a multicenter, retrospective and prospective, non-controlled, non-randomized post market clinical follow-up study. The objectives of this study are to confirm the long-term safety, performance and clinical benefits the Exception Cementless femoral stem (standard and varized) when used in primary total hip arthroplasty.
The primary aim of this study is to examine if Periacetabular Osteotomy (PAO) followed by 4 months of usual care followed by 8 months of progressive resistance training (PRT) is superior to 12 months of a PRT intervention in patients with hip dysplasia eligible for PAO in terms of self-reported pain on the HAGOS questionnaire. Secondary aims are to investigate changes in patient-reported symptoms, physical function in daily living, physical function in sport and recreation, hip and/or groin-related quality of life, generic health status, functional performance, muscle strength, physical activity and adverse events between PAO followed by usual care+PRT compared to PRT only. We hypothesise that in patients with hip dysplasia, PAO followed by usual care+PRT, results in significantly less pain at 12 months follow-up, compared to PRT only.