Clinical Trials Logo

Hernia clinical trials

View clinical trials related to Hernia.

Filter by:

NCT ID: NCT03133533 Withdrawn - Hernia, Inguinal Clinical Trials

Laparoscopic Versus Robot-assisted Inguinal Hernia Repair: A Single Institution Randomized Controlled Trial

Start date: May 2018
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Randomized trial to compare outcomes of laparoscopic and robot assisted inguinal hernia repair.

NCT ID: NCT03094039 Withdrawn - Clinical trials for Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia

Initiation of Resuscitation While Attached to the Cord With Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia

INSPIRE-CDH
Start date: April 27, 2017
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

This study aims to measure the cardio-respiratory physiological consequences of initiating resuscitation during placental transfusion (PT) with an intact umbilical cord in infants with congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH). PT, mainly via delayed cord clamping, has been shown to offer a higher circulating blood volume, less need for blood transfusion, less need for inotropes in infants. Currently infants with CDH receive immediate cord clamping (ICC) to facilitate immediate resuscitation including immediate intubation and mechanical ventilation. With the development of a resuscitation platform (iNSPiRE), resuscitative care can now be commenced from birth in infants with CDH to benefit from PT.

NCT ID: NCT02785276 Withdrawn - Pain, Postoperative Clinical Trials

Improving Pain Relief Following Laparoscopic Ventral Hernia Repair

Start date: August 2016
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Aim The general aim of this study is to improve post-operative pain and reduce morphine consumption following laparoscopic ventral hernia repair (LVHR). We specifically aim to conduct a randomized, double blinded, controlled trial to investigate the effect of intra-peritoneal local anaesthesia infusions on post-operative morphine consumption and. Methods: Patients will be randomised by computer generated random numbers (random permutation) and opaque envelope methods. At closure, one small 2mm catheter belonging to the AutoFuser pain pump system will be placed in the peritoneal cavity between the onlay mesh and parietal peritoneum. In the treatment arm patients will receive 275mL of 0.2% ropivacaine at 4mL/h. In the placebo arm, 275mL of 0.9% normal saline will be used in a similar fashion. The infusions will run for 68 hours total. All members involved in patient care (with the exception of one independant research fellow) will be blinded to the above. After 68 hours the pump will be stopped and the catheter will be removed. Assessment of post-operative pain will be performed by visual analogue scale, and total opiate consumption will be collected and converted into morphine equivalents. Health significance: Local anaesthesia has become an important addition to multimodal regimens of analgesia following surgery. Recent studies have shown that local anaesthetic (LA) wound infiltration has improved post-operative pain when compared with standard opioid regimens for pain relief. Only one previous study looked at bupivacaine infusions into the hernia sac for three days following LVHR. This study found no improvement in post-operative pain or morphine consumption. We aim to demonstrate improved pain and reduced morphine consumption using an alternative catheter insertion technique and ropivacaine as the desired LA agent.

NCT ID: NCT02730936 Withdrawn - Ventral Hernias Clinical Trials

Antimicrobial Hernia Repair Device

Start date: January 12, 2016
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

This prospective early feasibility clinical study will collect information regarding the safety and efficacy of the Cook® Antimicrobial Hernia Repair Device to reinforce soft tissue during ventral or incisional hernia repair in clean-contaminated and contaminated (i.e., Class II and Class III) surgical fields.

NCT ID: NCT02625077 Withdrawn - Clinical trials for Gastroesophageal Reflux

Valvuloplasty as Alternative to Toupet Fundoplication for GERD

VANTAGE
Start date: January 2016
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

This monocenter randomized controlled trial aims to compare postoperative outcomes of a laparoscopic valvuloplasty with a Toupet fundoplication in patients with GERD with a maximum hiatal hernia of 3cm. In addition, an economic evaluation of the new intervention will be done in order to determine cost-effectiveness and costs per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY).

NCT ID: NCT02584153 Withdrawn - Ventral Hernia Clinical Trials

A Study of Fibrin Sealant Plus Silver Microparticles to Prevent Incisional Hernias Following Abdominal Surgery

HiP_1
Start date: January 2019
Phase: Phase 1
Study type: Interventional

Incisional hernias are a frequent consequence of abdominal surgery. Current clinical efforts are primarily focused on improving repair materials and surgical techniques to correct these hernias instead of the optimal solution: prevention. A product called MYOSEAL is currently being developed to prevent hernia formation after abdominal surgery by using fibrin tissue sealant and silver particles to prophylactically enhance the early wound healing of myofascial incisions. The purpose of this phase 1 study is to examine the safety of applying MYOSEAL immediately after abdominal wall suture closure in patients undergoing abdominal surgery. The investigators expect that applying this product to sutured myofascial incisions will increase collagen formation in the wound and thus prevent the formation of incisional hernias.

NCT ID: NCT02408458 Withdrawn - Ventral Hernia Clinical Trials

Miromatrix Biological Mesh for Ventral Hernia Repair

MIROMESH PM-1
Start date: June 2015
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

This study is being conducted to gather long-term data of the performance of the Miromatrix Biological Mesh.

NCT ID: NCT02078934 Withdrawn - Weight Loss Clinical Trials

Endoscopic Gastric Plication for Weight Loss in Morbidly Obese Patients Prior to Incisional Hernia Repair

Start date: April 2015
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Incisional hernias occur in nearly 20% of all laparotomy incisions accounting for almost 400,000 ventral hernia repairs annually in the United States. There is an even higher incidence of incisional hernia recurrence after prior repair if the patient is obese. Each subsequent hernia repair leads to increased morbidity and durability. It is not infrequent that many surgeons will advise overweight or obese patients to lose substantial weight prior to complex incisional hernia repair. However, it is quite difficult for any individual to lose more than 8 pounds a month in a safe, rapid, and sustainable fashion. This is based on losing 2 lbs. per week utilizing diet and exercise alone. Many patients with incisional hernia are physically debilitated that they cannot engage in any substantial physical activity to lose weight. Traditional laparoscopic bariatric surgery (i.e. Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) and SG), while feasible, is a technically challenging endeavor since prior abdominal surgeries increase the amount of intra-abdominal adhesions. Furthermore, there is still a subset of patients who are not candidates for laparoscopic weight loss surgery because of inability to tolerate pneumoperitoneum due to underlying physiologic dysfunction. - Novel minimally invasive endoscopic technique may help obese patients with an incisional hernia lose weight in a safe and rapid fashion. Early case reports and small case series on gastric bypass revision utilizing such endoscopic technique have shown promise in efficacious weight loss. There have been reports of achieving nearly 20-25% excess weight loss. Abu Dayyeh and colleagues have also demonstrated that endoscopic gastric plication as a primary weight loss procedure is feasible, but their reported follow-up was only 3 months.8 Brethauer, et al. from Cleveland Clinic performed transoral gastric volume reduction for weight management in 18 patients (TRIM TRIAL). They utilized the Restore Suturing System (Restore device) and reported a mean decrease in BMI of -4.0 ± 3.5 kg/m2. Mean excess weight loss was 27.7% ± 21.9% with no reports of adverse events.9 There have also been reports of not only weight loss but improved insulin sensitivity and secretion.10 Laparoscopic gastric greater curvature plication afforded a mean 50.7% excess weight loss at 12 months.11 The intent of this study is not to demonstrate endoscopic suturing to be a primary option for weight-loss surgery. Preliminary reports have shown such procedure is technically feasible but not durable and the effects of the procedure varied widely among the study participants.12 The investigators view this technology as a bridge for morbidly obese patients, who will need subsequent surgery for another surgical disease, to improve their body habitus and decrease their postoperative morbidity and mortality. The aims of the investigators study are: - Feasibility of endoscopic gastric sleeve plication - Define the technical aspects of endoscopic suturing for sleeve plication - Provide long-term follow-up for both weight loss and resolution of their co-morbidities - Time from the endoscopic procedure to their incisional hernia repair - Photographic evidence of the stomach after endoscopic plication during the incisional hernia repair There are several advantages for the proposed study. First it avoids entering the intra-abdominal cavity. Second, the procedure is performed solely with sutures obviating the need for stapling which may increase the risk of gastric leak from the staple line.13 Lastly, it avoids placing endoscopic intra-luminal devices such as intragastric balloons or duodenal-jejunal sleeves. Limiting factor of such devices is a high rate of premature device withdrawal due to intolerance. Furthermore, their effects are short-lived as most devices will need to be removed by 12 weeks and they only offer a mean 23.6% excess weight loss.13, 14 The implications of this study can be far-reaching. Once efficacy is demonstrated where enough weight loss is achieved that patients can safely and quickly undergo their incisional hernia surgery, the investigators can then conduct a retrospective case-control cross-matched study to further delineate its true benefit. If there is a true benefit, then a randomized control study can be employed in the future.

NCT ID: NCT01776775 Withdrawn - Incisional Hernia Clinical Trials

The Effect of Postoperative Abdominal Binder to Improve Outcomes After Incisional Hernia Repair

INSAB
Start date: January 2016
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Postoperative seroma formation is one of the most common complications after ventral hernia repair with mesh. Although some seromas may not have clinical impact postoperative seroma formation often causes pain and discomfort and may even compromise wound healing. Abdominal binders (also called trusses, girdle, ostomy belt, longuette or abdominal belt) (AB) are commonly used in abdominal and plastic surgery to prevent seroma formation and diminish pain and discomfort after operation. The primary aim of the present study is to investigate the effect of postoperative abdominal binders after laparoscopic incisional hernia repair on postoperative pain, discomfort and quality of life. Secondary, we register seroma formation. A randomized, controlled, investigator-blinded study supplemented with blinded statistical analysis. We include 60 (2x30) incisional hernia repairs. Patients are randomized either to abdominal binder or no abdominal binder (controls). The abdominal binder is worn from immediately after the operation and continuously for 7 days and nights. All patients have a standardized operation with standardized intra- and postoperative medication regimen. Endpoints measurements are clinically detectable seroma formation scored with seroma classification system buý S. Morales-Conde, pain scored with self-registrations with VAS, and quality of life scored with EQ-5D, recurrence and other complications are also registered. Patients are followed until 90 days after the operation.

NCT ID: NCT01622413 Withdrawn - Clinical trials for Lumbar Disc Herniation

Trial to Show Non-inferiority / Superiority of an Endoscopic Transforaminal Discectomy to Standard Microdiscectomy

TESCORT
Start date: September 2013
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

This study compares an endoscopic transforaminal surgical technique for the treatment of a herniated disc to the standard microsurgical procedure. Clinical parameters as well as health economy will be assessed. The study hypothesis is that the endoscopic approach is equivalent or superior to microdiscectomy.