Clinical Trials Logo

Hernia, Inguinal clinical trials

View clinical trials related to Hernia, Inguinal.

Filter by:

NCT ID: NCT06070207 Completed - Pain Clinical Trials

Does the Mesh Have to be Fixed in Laparoscopic eTEP Repair of Bilateral Inguinal Hernia?

Start date: January 1, 2023
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Inguinal hernia surgery is one of the most frequently performed procedures among general surgery cases. As with many open surgical methods, this repair is also performed laparoscopically. Among these closed methods, the one method is laparoscopic extended total extraperitoneal repair (eTEP). The benefits of laparoscope include less postoperative pain and complications, faster recovery, reduced chronic pain, and recurrence rate. One of the recent debates regarding the laparoscopic technique is mesh fixation. Fixation of the mesh to the cooper ligament can prevent mesh migration and consequently reduce the recurrence rate. However, it has been reported that this fixation may increase postoperative pain. Several studies have reported that recurrence may be due to inadequate mesh fixation technique. In contrast, other prospective randomized studies have found relapse unrelated to mesh fixation. There are studies in the literature on mesh fixation related to the total extraperitoneal repair (TEP) technique. These studies are generally planned for unilateral hernias. It is a controversial issue among surgeons that the possibility of mesh migration is higher in bilateral hernias since there is a larger dissection area. This discussion is the starting point of this study. There were no studies in the literature regarding mesh fixation in bilateral inguinal hernias. The aim of this study is to compare bilateral inguinal hernia patients with and without mesh fixation in the eTEP technique in terms of both mesh migration and clinical features.

NCT ID: NCT06070142 Completed - Pain Clinical Trials

Does the Mesh Have to be Fixed in Laparoscopic eTEP Repair of Inguinal Hernia?

Start date: December 1, 2022
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Inguinal hernia surgery is one of the most frequently performed procedures among general surgery cases. As with many open surgical methods, this repair is also performed laparoscopically. Among these closed methods, the one method is laparoscopic extended total extraperitoneal repair (eTEP). The benefits of laparoscope include less postoperative pain and complications, faster recovery, reduced chronic pain, and recurrence rate. One of the recent debates regarding the laparoscopic technique is mesh fixation. Fixation of the mesh to the cooper ligament can prevent mesh migration and consequently reduce the recurrence rate. However, it has been reported that this fixation may increase postoperative pain. Several studies have reported that recurrence may be due to inadequate mesh fixation technique. In contrast, other prospective randomized studies have found relapse unrelated to mesh fixation. In the eTEP technique, dissection is performed in a larger area than in TEP. For this reason, it can be thought that the possibility of mesh displacement is higher in the eTEP procedure. The purpose of this study is to confirm this idea with a prospective study. There are studies in the literature on mesh fixation related to the total extraperitoneal repair (TEP) technique. However, there is no study on mesh detection in the eTEP technique. The aim of the study is to compare patients who underwent without mesh fixation laparoscopic TEP and eTEP repair in terms of clinical data such as mesh displacement and hernia recurrence, chronic pain, length of hospital stay, and postoperative complications.

NCT ID: NCT06050538 Completed - Clinical trials for Recurrent Inguinal Hernia

Laparscopic Hernioplasty in Recurrent Inguinal Hernia

Start date: February 1, 2021
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

The purpose of this study was to compare between laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) and totally extraperitoneal (TEP) repair of inguinal hernia in recurrent inguinal hernia.

NCT ID: NCT06020768 Completed - Inguinal Hernia Clinical Trials

The Effect of Different Bed-Head Angles on the Haemodynamic Parameters of Intensive Care Patients Lying in the Supine Position

Start date: March 1, 2022
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Aim: The aim of this study was to examine the effect of different bed-head angles given to patients lying in the supine position in an intensive care unit on the haemodynamic parameters of central venous pressure, systolic and diastolic blood pressure, heart rate, breathing rate and peripheral oxygen saturation. Methods: The study was conducted with 50 intensive care patients aged 18 and over in a general surgery intensive care unit in Turkey. With each patient in the supine position, the bed-head was raised to an angle of 0, 20, 30 and 45 degrees without a pillow, and the haemodynamic parameters of central venous pressure, systolic and diastolic blood pressure, heart rate, breathing rate and peripheral oxygen saturation were recorded after 0 and 10 minutes.

NCT ID: NCT06008535 Completed - Chronic Pain Clinical Trials

10-year Results of Open Inguinal Hernia Repair

Start date: May 22, 2018
Phase:
Study type: Observational

The main goal of the research is to evaluate the long-term results of open anterior alloplasty of inguinal hernia, mainly the occurrence of recurrences. The secondary aim of the study is to clarify the incidence of chronic pain and foreign body sensation 10 years after inguinal hernia surgery. Patients who meet the criteria for inclusion in the study are invited to an appointment, where a questionnaire is filled out, an clinical examination and an ultrasound examination are performed.

NCT ID: NCT05969613 Completed - Inguinal Hernia Clinical Trials

Comparison of Regional Block, Wound Infiltration and Caudal Block for Pain Management in Children

RCT
Start date: April 1, 2019
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Comparison of regional block, wound infiltration and caudal block for post operative pain management in participants undergoing inguinal herniotomy.

NCT ID: NCT05952791 Completed - Groin Hernia Clinical Trials

Case Report in Complications After Laparoscopic Transabdominal Preperitoneal Groin Hernia Repair Using LiquiBandFIX8®

Start date: January 5, 2022
Phase:
Study type: Observational

This an a case report about management and proving the strenght and resistance of LiquiBandFIX8® using for peritoneal closure in a laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal groin hernia repair. The patient had anticoagulation due to a mechanical valvula and postoperatively the patient developed a huge hematoma extraperitoneally. Relaparoscopy war performed to identify the problem and check the peritoneal closure.

NCT ID: NCT05919732 Completed - Inguinal Hernia Clinical Trials

Awake Caudal Catheter vs General Anesthesia

Start date: March 8, 2016
Phase: Phase 4
Study type: Interventional

It is well established that preterm inguinal hernias discovered in the NICU pose a significant surgical risk due to the associated co-morbid conditions that accompany these patients. Currently, the standard of care in the United States is general anesthesia. There have been studies that have established that elective outpatient repair of inguinal hernias found in the NICU can be safely performed. Patients that are ready for discharge from the NICU will have inguinal hernia repair prior to leaving. Inguinal hernia repair will also be done on those premature infants that are seen in the Nemours surgical clinic. Spinal anesthesia is currently the most common anesthetic procedure used in the surgical treatment of preterm inguinal hernias after general anesthesia. Caudal catheter technique has been proven to safely provide post-operative care of premature infants. The caudal catheter technique involves placement of a small catheter under ultrasound guidance into the caudal epidural canal to allow re-dosing of local anesthetic during the case and has been shown to be safe and effective management in neonates (Somri M, 2007).

NCT ID: NCT05873582 Completed - Clinical trials for Inguinal Hernia Repair

Robotic Minimally Invasive Inguinal Hernia Repair With Dexter

RAS-Ahead
Start date: June 2, 2023
Phase:
Study type: Observational

This study aims to confirm the perioperative and early postoperative safety and clinical performance (efficacy) of the Dexter Robotic System, in patients undergoing primary transperitoneal unilateral or bilateral inguinal hernia repair.

NCT ID: NCT05837013 Completed - Pain, Postoperative Clinical Trials

Open and Laparoscopic Total Extraperitoneal Repair Under Spinal Anesthesia Versus General Anesthesia

Start date: September 20, 2023
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Inguinal hernia surgery is one of the most frequently performed procedures among general surgery cases. As with many open surgical methods, this repair is also performed laparoscopically. Among these closed methods, the most frequently applied method is laparoscopic total extraperitoneal repair (TEP). In general, this surgery is performed under general anesthesia (GA) in many centers. However, in cases where general anesthesia is inconvenient, local or other anesthesia methods are preferred. It has been stated in many studies in the literature that this surgery can be performed with methods other than general anesthesia. In a study of 480 patients, one of which was Sinha et al., it was shown that this surgical procedure was successfully performed under spinal anesthesia (SA). In a prospective randomized study by Dönmez et al., patients who underwent TEP under general anesthesia and spinal anesthesia were compared. It has been reported that TEP repair can be performed safely under SA and that SA is associated with less postoperative pain, better recovery, and better patient satisfaction than GA.2 In a retrospective study by Yıldırım et al. It has been shown that there is significantly less need for analgesics and better patient satisfaction. There are also many meta-analyses made on this subject in the literature. Compared with GA in these, SA was associated with a longer operative time, and postoperative pain and nausea and vomiting were less in SA. However, the risk of urinary retention in SA was significantly increased. It was observed that there was no significant difference in surgical complications such as seroma and wound infection. Despite all these studies, until now, there is no clear consensus on which anesthesia should be used. The aim of the study is to show the effect of both the surgical method and the anesthesia method on the patient during surgery and in the early postoperative period in inguinal hernia