Hepatocellular Carcinoma Clinical Trial
Official title:
Diagnostic Accuracy of APAC, ASAP and GALAD Scores in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Among Cirrhotic Patients
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the most common primary liver malignancy with most patients developing HCC due to chronic liver diseases. Unfortunately, HCC has a morality to incidence ratio that approaches 1. Among the etiological factors associated with HCC, hepatitis C virus (HCV) and Hepatitis B virus (HBV) infections are major risk factors. Despite HBV vaccination programs and effective direct antiviral agents (DAA) for treatment of HCV, the incidence of virus-related HCC remains high. HCV eradication by antiviral treatment reduces but does not eliminate HCC risk. Patients with HCV-related cirrhosis require HCC surveillance even after sustained virologic response (SVR) due to a persistent risk of HCC even years after SVR . In Egypt, HCC represents the fourth common cancer and is the most common cause of mortality-related and morbidity-related cancer. Egypt ranks the third and 15th most populous country in Africa and worldwide, respectively, and the Egyptian health authorities consider HCC as one of the most challenging health problems for the current decade. Both HCC screening and monitoring efforts have improved significantly since 2018 as a result of the national screening campaign .The early diagnosis of HCC is essential to initiate curative treatments to improve short term and long-term prognosis. Therefore, highly effective methods are needed to detect HCC at an earlier stage. American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases (AASLD) and European Association for the Study of the Liver (EASL) guidelines recommend the periodic use of ultrasound scanning (USS), with or without Alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) evaluation, for HCC surveillance. However, suboptimal performance of USS has been reported, with its sensitivity being compromised by the extent of liver cirrhosis, high body mass index (BMI), etiology of liver disease, expertise of the operator and quality of the equipment. Moreover, its sensitivity and specificity for early-stage HCC was found to be rather low . Serum biomarkers play an essential role in diagnosing HCC, as biomarkers are often more convenient, inexpensive, non-invasive, and reproducible . Alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) is a widely used biomarker for HCC diagnosis. The diagnostic accuracy of AFP is limited, however, due to its high false-negative rate to detect small or early stage tumors. As previous studies have demonstrated, the sensitivity of AFP among patients with HCC was 52% for tumors > 3cm and dropped to only 25% for tumors < 3cm. In addition, AFP may also be elevated in some benign liver diseases, such as chronic hepatitis and cirrhosis even in the absence of HCC.
Status | Not yet recruiting |
Enrollment | 90 |
Est. completion date | March 2024 |
Est. primary completion date | March 2024 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
Gender | All |
Age group | 18 Years and older |
Eligibility | Inclusion Criteria: - A total of 90 adult patients with liver cirrhosis attending the outpatient clinic or inpatient section of the department of tropical medicine and gastroenterology at Sohag University Hospital will be included in the study. Patients will be divided into two groups Exclusion Criteria: - 1. patients aged <18 years old. 2. Presence of clinically suspected other causes of hepatocellular injury (any history of alcoholism, autoimmune hepatitis, primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC), primary biliary cholangitis (PBC), Wilson's disease, fatty liver diseases with metabolic syndrome & drug induced liver disease). 3. Receipt of any tumor specific therapy before blood samples collection. 4. Any patients who are on warfarin will be excluded as warfarin can elevate the DCP level in the absence of HCC. 5. Patients having malignancies other than HCC. 6. Presence of distant metastasis. 7. Presence of venous thromboembolism including portal vein thrombosis |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
Egypt | Sohag University Hospital | Sohag |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
Sohag University |
Egypt,
Caviglia GP, Ribaldone DG, Abate ML, Ciancio A, Pellicano R, Smedile A, Saracco GM. Performance of protein induced by vitamin K absence or antagonist-II assessed by chemiluminescence enzyme immunoassay for hepatocellular carcinoma detection: a meta-analysis. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2018 Jun;53(6):734-740. doi: 10.1080/00365521.2018.1459824. Epub 2018 Apr 18. — View Citation
Choi JY, Jung SW, Kim HY, Kim M, Kim Y, Kim DG, Oh EJ. Diagnostic value of AFP-L3 and PIVKA-II in hepatocellular carcinoma according to total-AFP. World J Gastroenterol. 2013 Jan 21;19(3):339-46. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i3.339. — View Citation
D'Ambrosio R, Colombo M. Should surveillance for liver cancer be modified in hepatitis C patients after treatment-related cirrhosis regression? Liver Int. 2016 Jun;36(6):783-90. doi: 10.1111/liv.13106. Epub 2016 Mar 24. — View Citation
Heimbach JK, Kulik LM, Finn RS, Sirlin CB, Abecassis MM, Roberts LR, Zhu AX, Murad MH, Marrero JA. AASLD guidelines for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatology. 2018 Jan;67(1):358-380. doi: 10.1002/hep.29086. No abstract available. — View Citation
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | serum level of AFP-L3. | Assay of AFP-L3 will be done by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) then Diagnostic scoring tools were calculated using the following formulae:The GALAD score will be calculated using the following equation: GALAD score = - 10.08 + 0.09 × age + 1.67 × gender + 2.34 × Lg (AFP [ng/ml]) + 0.04 × AFP-L3%% + 1.33 × Lg (PIVKA-II [mAU/ml]), where gender = 0 for females and 1 for males. - The probability of HCC in a patient was calculated as follows: Pr (HCC)=exp (Z)/ (1 + exp (Z)) (z: GALAD)The ASAP score was calculated using the following equation: ASAP score = -7.58 + 0.05
× age - 0.58 × gender +0.42 × Ln (AFP [ng/ml]) + 1.11 × Ln (PIVIKA-II [mAU/ml]), where gender = 0 for males and 1 for femalesThe APAC score = (Age [years] x 0.20480) - (log10(sPDGFRß [pg/mL]) x 1.98684) + (log10(AFP [ng/mL]) x 2.45657) - (Creatinine [mg/dL] x 2.46891) - 4.36493 |
one year | |
Primary | serum level of DCP | Assay of DCP will be done by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) then Diagnostic scoring tools were calculated using the following formulae:The GALAD score will be calculated using the following equation: GALAD score = - 10.08 + 0.09 × age + 1.67 × gender + 2.34 × Lg (AFP [ng/ml]) + 0.04 × AFP-L3%% + 1.33 × Lg (PIVKA-II [mAU/ml]), where gender = 0 for females and 1 for males. - The probability of HCC in a patient was calculated as follows: Pr (HCC)=exp (Z)/ (1 + exp (Z)) (z: GALAD)The ASAP score was calculated using the following equation: ASAP score = -7.58 + 0.05
× age - 0.58 × gender +0.42 × Ln (AFP [ng/ml]) + 1.11 × Ln (PIVIKA-II [mAU/ml]), where gender = 0 for males and 1 for femalesThe APAC score = (Age [years] x 0.20480) - (log10(sPDGFRß [pg/mL]) x 1.98684) + (log10(AFP [ng/mL]) x 2.45657) - (Creatinine [mg/dL] x 2.46891) - 4.36493 |
1 year | |
Primary | Serum level of Soluble PDGFRß | Assay of Soluble PDGFRß will be done by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) then Diagnostic scoring tools were calculated using the following formulae:The GALAD score will be calculated using the following equation: GALAD score = - 10.08 + 0.09 × age + 1.67 × gender + 2.34 × Lg (AFP [ng/ml]) + 0.04 × AFP-L3%% + 1.33 × Lg (PIVKA-II [mAU/ml]), where gender = 0 for females and 1 for males. - The probability of HCC in a patient was calculated as follows: Pr (HCC)=exp (Z)/ (1 + exp (Z)) (z: GALAD)The ASAP score was calculated using the following equation: ASAP score = -7.58 + 0.05
× age - 0.58 × gender +0.42 × Ln (AFP [ng/ml]) + 1.11 × Ln (PIVIKA-II [mAU/ml]), where gender = 0 for males and 1 for femalesThe APAC score = (Age [years] x 0.20480) - (log10(sPDGFRß [pg/mL]) x 1.98684) + (log10(AFP [ng/mL]) x 2.45657) - (Creatinine [mg/dL] x 2.46891) - 4.36493 |
1 year |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Recruiting |
NCT04209491 -
Interest of the Intervention of a Nurse Coordinator in Complex Care Pathway
|
||
Completed |
NCT03963206 -
Cabozantinib toLERANCE Study in HepatoCellular Carcinoma (CLERANCE)
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT03268499 -
TACE Emulsion Versus Suspension
|
Phase 2 | |
Recruiting |
NCT05044676 -
Immune Cells as a New Biomarker of Response in Patients Treated by Immunotherapy for Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT05263830 -
Glypican-3 as a Prognostic Factor in Patients With Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treated by Immunotherapy
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT05095519 -
Hepatocellular Carcinoma Imaging Using PSMA PET/CT
|
Phase 2 | |
Recruiting |
NCT05497531 -
Pilot Comparing ctDNA IDV vs. SPV Sample in Pts Undergoing Biopsies for Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Cancers
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT05068193 -
A Clinical Trial to Compare the Pharmacokinetics and Bioequivalence of "BR2008" With "BR2008-1" in Healthy Volunteers
|
Phase 1 | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT03781934 -
A Study to Evaluate MIV-818 in Patients With Liver Cancer Manifestations
|
Phase 1/Phase 2 | |
Terminated |
NCT03655613 -
APL-501 or Nivolumab in Combination With APL-101 in Locally Advanced or Metastatic HCC and RCC
|
Phase 1/Phase 2 | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT03170960 -
Study of Cabozantinib in Combination With Atezolizumab to Subjects With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Solid Tumors
|
Phase 1/Phase 2 | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT04242199 -
Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics, and Pharmacodynamics of INCB099280 in Participants With Advanced Solid Tumors
|
Phase 1 | |
Completed |
NCT04401800 -
Preliminary Antitumor Activity, Safety and Tolerability of Tislelizumab in Combination With Lenvatinib for Hepatocellular Carcinoma
|
Phase 2 | |
Withdrawn |
NCT05418387 -
A Social Support Intervention to Improve Treatment Among Hispanic Kidney and Liver Cancer Patients in Arizona
|
N/A | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT04039607 -
A Study of Nivolumab in Combination With Ipilimumab in Participants With Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma
|
Phase 3 | |
Terminated |
NCT03970616 -
A Study of Tivozanib in Combination With Durvalumab in Subjects With Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma
|
Phase 1/Phase 2 | |
Recruiting |
NCT04118114 -
Phase II Study of PRL3-ZUMAB in Advanced Solid Tumors
|
Phase 2 | |
Recruiting |
NCT03642561 -
Evaluation the Treatment Outcome for RFA in Patients With BCLC Stage B HCC in Comparison With TACE
|
Phase 2/Phase 3 | |
Recruiting |
NCT06239155 -
A Phase I/II Study of AST-3424 in Subjects With Advanced Solid Tumors
|
Phase 1/Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT03222076 -
Nivolumab With or Without Ipilimumab in Treating Patients With Resectable Liver Cancer
|
Phase 2 |