Hepatocellular Carcinoma Clinical Trial
Official title:
A Single Center Experience:Safety and Efficacy of DEB-TACE Performed With a Novel Reflux-control Microcatheter in Patients With Early and Intermediate HCC.
NCT number | NCT04653701 |
Other study ID # | 5077 |
Secondary ID | |
Status | Recruiting |
Phase | |
First received | |
Last updated | |
Start date | November 14, 2020 |
Est. completion date | February 20, 2022 |
BACKGROUND: Hepatocellular carcinoma is the fifth most frequent cancer in the world, with a diagnosis of more than 500,000 new cases per year. It is considered the third leading cause of cancer mortality and presents well-defined risk factors. Liver cirrhosis is the main risk factor for developing HCC, therefore screening programs in cirrhotic patients will allow the early diagnosis of this neoplasia. Despite this, most HCCs are diagnosed at a stage in which the application of curative therapies is no longer possible. Hepatic transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) belongs to the arterially directed embolization therapies for the treatment of unresectable early-to-advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). It is the only therapy that has shown to improve survival in intermediate-stage HCC. Drug-eluting beads (DEB)-TACE has shown to provide slow drug elution, reduced liver and systemic toxicity, increased local drug concentration, and tissue necrosis. Aside from TACE, other transarterial options include bland embolization, or hepatic artery embolization (HAE), and transarterial radioembolization (TARE). All have an acceptable safety profile, and each has its associated procedural and peri-procedural complications. One potential complication that may occur during all embolization procedures is when the embolic material migrates outside of the desired treatment area, leading to non-target embolization (NTE). In fact, when collateral vessels are embolized, there is a risk that these may be feeders of non-target tissue or organs. NTE following TACE in particular may lead to a double-layer problem: dangerous components affecting healthy tissue, one ischemic and one related to cytotoxicity from the chemotherapeutic agent, which may have clinical consequences, and potential incomplete treatment of the lesion (due to beads being "deviated" from target). NTE is highly recognized, but often thought to be uncommon, and although different complications can be caused by it, there may appear to be no evidence of NTE during the intraprocedural imaging. To avoid the complications due to NTE, apart from the importance of the pre-, intra- and post-procedural imaging, and the thorough study of the anatomical picture, the catheters/microcatheters should also be chosen with reason and care. In particular, selective catheterization should be achieved by placing the microcatheter tip as close as possible to the target, through the specific branch/branches supplying it. However, even with the microcatheter selectively positioned in the vessel to be embolized, the risk of NTE might not be eliminated, since it could happen as a result of changes in flow dynamics that occur during embolization, particularly when the endpoint is stasis. These changes could result in reflux into non-target territories and, as such, might be better prevented with the use of microcatheters intended to reduce reflux. To this purpose, the use of a dedicated delivery device should be taken into consideration, in order to optimize and save time during the procedure. Microcatheters are commonly used during most arterial embolization procedures, and as explained above, there is a strong rationale to use a reflux-control microcatheter - like Sequre - for DEB-TACE. The main expectation is to achieve technical success with Sequre in all patients with a reachable target lesion, with the intent not only to minimize potential damage to surrounding tissue, but also to potentially deliver more treatment embolics, as all the beads are (re)directed towards the target. The use of small diameter particles (100 micron-TANDEM ® spheres), induces superior tumor necrosis response (Urbano et al., European Journal of Radiology, 2020); with the synergistic effect of being administered through the SEQURE anti-reflux protection system, there is reason to believe that it will be possible to administer maximum doses of doxorubicin, while avoiding the occlusion of non-target arterial segments (SYNERGIC EFFECT). STUDY PROPOSAL: We propose a prospective observational study with data collection from a single center (Virgen de las Nieves University Hospital-Granada), for a period that ranges October 2020-December 2021. Here summarized the inclusion criteria and contraindications: Inclusion criteria - BCLC B and or some case BCLC A - Both genders - Over 18 years. - Bilirubin less than 3 gr/dl. - No contraindications to the use of iodinated contrast - Absence of chronic kidney disease - ECOG 0-1. - Absence of encephalopathy. - Informed consent. Contraindications - Advanced liver disease. - Thrombosis or reversal of portal flow. - Vascular invasion. - Extrahepatic spread. - Contraindication to administration of cytostatics. - Contraindication to angiographic procedure.
Status | Recruiting |
Enrollment | 30 |
Est. completion date | February 20, 2022 |
Est. primary completion date | November 20, 2021 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | Accepts Healthy Volunteers |
Gender | All |
Age group | 18 Years and older |
Eligibility | Inclusion Criteria: - BCLC B and or some case BCLC A - Both genders - Over 18 years. - Bilirubin less than 3 gr/dl. - No contraindications to the use of iodinated contrast - Absence of chronic kidney disease - ECOG 0-1. - Absence of encephalopathy. - Informed consent. Exclusion Criteria: - Advanced liver disease. - Thrombosis or reversal of portal flow. - Vascular invasion. - Extrahepatic spread. - Contraindication to administration of cytostatics. - Contraindication to angiographic procedure. |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
Spain | Juan Jose Ciampi Dopazo | Granada |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
Juan José Ciampi Dopazo |
Spain,
Aliberti C, Carandina R, Lonardi S, Dadduzio V, Vitale A, Gringeri E, Zanus G, Cillo U. Transarterial Chemoembolization with Small Drug-Eluting Beads in Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Experience from a Cohort of 421 Patients at an Italian Center. — View Citation
Delicque J, Guiu B, Boulin M, Schwanz H, Piron L, Cassinotto C. Liver chemoembolization of hepatocellular carcinoma using TANDEM(®) microspheres. Future Oncol. 2018 Nov;14(26):2761-2772. doi: 10.2217/fon-2018-0237. Epub 2018 Jun 28. Review. — View Citation
Lammer J, Malagari K, Vogl T, Pilleul F, Denys A, Watkinson A, Pitton M, Sergent G, Pfammatter T, Terraz S, Benhamou Y, Avajon Y, Gruenberger T, Pomoni M, Langenberger H, Schuchmann M, Dumortier J, Mueller C, Chevallier P, Lencioni R; PRECISION V Investig — View Citation
López-Benítez R, Richter GM, Kauczor HU, Stampfl S, Kladeck J, Radeleff BA, Neukamm M, Hallscheidt PJ. Analysis of nontarget embolization mechanisms during embolization and chemoembolization procedures. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2009 Jul;32(4):615-22. — View Citation
Urbano J, Echevarria-Uraga JJ, Ciampi-Dopazo JJ, Sánchez-Corral JA, Cobos Alonso J, Anton-Ladislao A, Peña-Baranda B, Nacarino-Mejias V, González-Costero R, Muñoz Ruiz-Canela JJ, Pérez-Cuesta J, Lanciego C, de Gregorio MA. Multicentre prospective study of — View Citation
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | Objective Response Rate (ORR) | ORR is defined as a complete or partial response among total of treated cases, according to mRECIST evaluated by CT or MRI. The value of these data is a percentage considering tumour diameter before and after treatment. | Assessed at 3 months after patient inclusion | |
Primary | Objective Response Rate (ORR) | ORR is defined as a complete or partial response among total of treated cases, according to mRECIST evaluated by CT or MRI. The value of these data is a percentage considering tumour diameter before and after treatment. | Assessed at 6 months after patient inclusion | |
Primary | Disease Control Rate (DCR) | DCR is defined as a complete, partial response or stable disease among total of treated cases, according to mRECIST evaluated by CT or MRI. The value of these data is a percentage considering tumour diameter before and after treatment. | Assessed at 3 months after patient inclusion | |
Primary | Disease Control Rate (DCR) | DCR is defined as a complete, partial response or stable disease among total of treated cases, according to mRECIST evaluated by CT or MRI. The value of these data is a percentage considering tumour diameter before and after treatment. | Assessed at 6 months after patient inclusion | |
Primary | Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAE) | The incidence of emerging AE and SAE will be summarized according to standardized qualification criteria (JVIR SAE), including pancreatitis, cholecystitis, clinical presentations, PES, etc. | Assessed up to 30 days after patient inclusion | |
Primary | Technical success | Defined as a composite outcome measurement: ability to place the micro-catheter inside the required vascular segment and qualitative assessment of microspheres deposition in the target tumour. | up to 1 hour after patient inclusion (or after patient treatment) |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Recruiting |
NCT04209491 -
Interest of the Intervention of a Nurse Coordinator in Complex Care Pathway
|
||
Completed |
NCT03963206 -
Cabozantinib toLERANCE Study in HepatoCellular Carcinoma (CLERANCE)
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT03268499 -
TACE Emulsion Versus Suspension
|
Phase 2 | |
Recruiting |
NCT05263830 -
Glypican-3 as a Prognostic Factor in Patients With Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treated by Immunotherapy
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT05044676 -
Immune Cells as a New Biomarker of Response in Patients Treated by Immunotherapy for Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT05095519 -
Hepatocellular Carcinoma Imaging Using PSMA PET/CT
|
Phase 2 | |
Recruiting |
NCT05497531 -
Pilot Comparing ctDNA IDV vs. SPV Sample in Pts Undergoing Biopsies for Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Cancers
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT05068193 -
A Clinical Trial to Compare the Pharmacokinetics and Bioequivalence of "BR2008" With "BR2008-1" in Healthy Volunteers
|
Phase 1 | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT03781934 -
A Study to Evaluate MIV-818 in Patients With Liver Cancer Manifestations
|
Phase 1/Phase 2 | |
Terminated |
NCT03655613 -
APL-501 or Nivolumab in Combination With APL-101 in Locally Advanced or Metastatic HCC and RCC
|
Phase 1/Phase 2 | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT03170960 -
Study of Cabozantinib in Combination With Atezolizumab to Subjects With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Solid Tumors
|
Phase 1/Phase 2 | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT04242199 -
Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics, and Pharmacodynamics of INCB099280 in Participants With Advanced Solid Tumors
|
Phase 1 | |
Completed |
NCT04401800 -
Preliminary Antitumor Activity, Safety and Tolerability of Tislelizumab in Combination With Lenvatinib for Hepatocellular Carcinoma
|
Phase 2 | |
Withdrawn |
NCT05418387 -
A Social Support Intervention to Improve Treatment Among Hispanic Kidney and Liver Cancer Patients in Arizona
|
N/A | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT04039607 -
A Study of Nivolumab in Combination With Ipilimumab in Participants With Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma
|
Phase 3 | |
Terminated |
NCT03970616 -
A Study of Tivozanib in Combination With Durvalumab in Subjects With Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma
|
Phase 1/Phase 2 | |
Recruiting |
NCT04118114 -
Phase II Study of PRL3-ZUMAB in Advanced Solid Tumors
|
Phase 2 | |
Recruiting |
NCT06239155 -
A Phase I/II Study of AST-3424 in Subjects With Advanced Solid Tumors
|
Phase 1/Phase 2 | |
Recruiting |
NCT03642561 -
Evaluation the Treatment Outcome for RFA in Patients With BCLC Stage B HCC in Comparison With TACE
|
Phase 2/Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT03222076 -
Nivolumab With or Without Ipilimumab in Treating Patients With Resectable Liver Cancer
|
Phase 2 |