Radial Versus Femoral Access for Superselective Embolization of

Status Not yet recruiting

Clinical Trial Summary

The aim of this prospective, randomized study is to compare TRA vs TFA for superselective embolization of HCC using bland microparticles performed by multiple operators.

In particular, main objectives are to compare:

1. the success rates of TRA and TFA including crossing over events between techniques

2. the inter-operator outcomes in terms of time to complete the vascular access and the vessel catheterization

3. access-related adverse events

4. patient preference and reported discomfort

Clinical Trial Description

Hepatic arterial chemoembolization is a safe, proven, and effective technique for the treatment of a number of malignancies, including primary and secondary tumors [1, 2]. This endovascular treatment is performed via femoral artery access in most cases. In the last decades, the transradial approach (TRA) has emerged as a valid alternative to the transfemoral approach (TFA), and it is commonly used in coronary angioplasty as well as stent placement. In particular, shorter monitoring time after the procedure, earlier ambulation, shorter hospital stay and less discomfort associated with potentially reduced bleeding risks make TRA an attractive alternative to TFA.

To date, only one study exists comparing TRA vs TFA in liver embolizations [3]. However, it is non-randomized and reports only the outcomes of one operator performing lobar embolization for multiple liver malignancies.

The aim of this prospective, randomized study is to compare TRA vs TFA for superselective embolization of HCC using bland microparticles performed by multiple operators.

In particular, main objectives are to compare:

1. the success rates of TRA and TFA including crossing over events between techniques

2. the inter-operator outcomes in terms of time to complete the vascular access and the vessel catheterization

3. access-related adverse events

4. patient preference and reported discomfort ;

Study Design

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

Carcinoma
Carcinoma, Hepatocellular
Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Hepatocellular Carcinoma Non-resectable

Clinical Trial Details

NCT number	NCT03807947
Study type	Interventional
Source	Humanitas Clinical and Research Center
Contact
Status	Not yet recruiting
Phase	N/A
Start date	January 2019
Completion date	April 2020

View Details

See also
Status	Clinical Trial	Phase
Recruiting	`NCT04209491` - Interest of the Intervention of a Nurse Coordinator in Complex Care Pathway
Completed	`NCT03963206` - Cabozantinib toLERANCE Study in HepatoCellular Carcinoma (CLERANCE)	Phase 4
Completed	`NCT03268499` - TACE Emulsion Versus Suspension	Phase 2
Recruiting	`NCT05044676` - Immune Cells as a New Biomarker of Response in Patients Treated by Immunotherapy for Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Recruiting	`NCT05263830` - Glypican-3 as a Prognostic Factor in Patients With Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treated by Immunotherapy
Recruiting	`NCT05095519` - Hepatocellular Carcinoma Imaging Using PSMA PET/CT	Phase 2
Recruiting	`NCT05497531` - Pilot Comparing ctDNA IDV vs. SPV Sample in Pts Undergoing Biopsies for Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Cancers	N/A
Completed	`NCT05068193` - A Clinical Trial to Compare the Pharmacokinetics and Bioequivalence of "BR2008" With "BR2008-1" in Healthy Volunteers	Phase 1
Active, not recruiting	`NCT03781934` - A Study to Evaluate MIV-818 in Patients With Liver Cancer Manifestations	Phase 1/Phase 2
Terminated	`NCT03655613` - APL-501 or Nivolumab in Combination With APL-101 in Locally Advanced or Metastatic HCC and RCC	Phase 1/Phase 2
Active, not recruiting	`NCT03170960` - Study of Cabozantinib in Combination With Atezolizumab to Subjects With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Solid Tumors	Phase 1/Phase 2
Active, not recruiting	`NCT04242199` - Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics, and Pharmacodynamics of INCB099280 in Participants With Advanced Solid Tumors	Phase 1
Completed	`NCT04401800` - Preliminary Antitumor Activity, Safety and Tolerability of Tislelizumab in Combination With Lenvatinib for Hepatocellular Carcinoma	Phase 2
Withdrawn	`NCT05418387` - A Social Support Intervention to Improve Treatment Among Hispanic Kidney and Liver Cancer Patients in Arizona	N/A
Active, not recruiting	`NCT04039607` - A Study of Nivolumab in Combination With Ipilimumab in Participants With Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma	Phase 3
Terminated	`NCT03970616` - A Study of Tivozanib in Combination With Durvalumab in Subjects With Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma	Phase 1/Phase 2
Recruiting	`NCT06239155` - A Phase I/II Study of AST-3424 in Subjects With Advanced Solid Tumors	Phase 1/Phase 2
Recruiting	`NCT03642561` - Evaluation the Treatment Outcome for RFA in Patients With BCLC Stage B HCC in Comparison With TACE	Phase 2/Phase 3
Recruiting	`NCT04118114` - Phase II Study of PRL3-ZUMAB in Advanced Solid Tumors	Phase 2
Completed	`NCT03222076` - Nivolumab With or Without Ipilimumab in Treating Patients With Resectable Liver Cancer	Phase 2

Clinical trials are conducted in a series of steps, called phases - each phase is designed to answer a separate research question.

Phase 1: Researchers test a new drug or treatment in a small group of people for the first time to evaluate its safety, determine a safe dosage range, and identify side effects.
Phase 2: The drug or treatment is given to a larger group of people to see if it is effective and to further evaluate its safety.
Phase 3: The drug or treatment is given to large groups of people to confirm its effectiveness, monitor side effects, compare it to commonly used treatments, and collect information that will allow the drug or treatment to be used safely.
Phase 4: Studies are done after the drug or treatment has been marketed to gather information on the drug's effect in various populations and any side effects associated with long-term use.

Radial Versus Femoral Access for Superselective Embolization of Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Clinical Trial Summary

Clinical Trial Description

Study Design

Related Conditions & MeSH terms