Hepatocellular Carcinoma Clinical Trial
Official title:
Surefire vs. Endhole for DEB-TACE: Quantifying Hepatic Artery Embolization to Improve Outcomes by Comparing Two Different Catheter Systems for DEB-TACE (QED Study)
Patients enrolled in this study have been diagnosed with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and
are scheduled to have a procedure called drug-eluting bead trans-arterial chemoembolization
(DEB-TACE). During the DEB-TACE procedure, very small beads are mixed in with a chemotherapy
drug, doxorubicin, and delivered to the tumor through an arterial catheter.
The DEB-TACE procedure allows the treatment to be delivered directly into the liver. It also
causes arterial embolization, the process in which a blood vessel is blocked. Treatment of
HCC using DEB-TACE may help delay tumor progression and can downstage (decrease the size) the
cancer in order to meet the criteria which may allow patients to become candidates for liver
transplantation. The purpose of this study is to compare tumor response and medical outcomes
for patients who undergo DEB-TACE with standard endhole catheter versus Surefire® Infusion
System.
Conventional transarterial chemoembolization with lipiodol/doxorubicin (cTACE) is known to
prolong survival compared to supportive therapy in certain patients with unresectable HCC,
including patients with unilateral portal vein invasion (PVI). TACE with doxorubicin-eluting
beads (DEB-TACE) is a relatively new modality associated with favorable systemic doxorubicin
exposure/toxicity and liver-specific toxicity compared to cTACE and studies have documented
its safety and efficacy. DEB-TACE is currently utilized for: (1) patients who have
unresectable HCC; and (2) patients who meet the Milan Criteria and currently on liver
transplantation lists.
The biggest challenge for these procedures has been the inability to actually quantify
embolization in a real-time setting to provide immediate feedback to the operator. Although
various methods, such as perfusion analysis with CT or MRI, have been described, these
require advanced imaging equipment/capabilities, extensive post processing analysis, and can
create challenging workflows.
Currently the best results occur when the dose is delivered in a highly targeted manner into
the tumor. Dense accumulation of embolic spheres or lipiodol into the tumor as documented by
CT has been shown to have improved outcomes. However, with standard endhole catheters
achieving maximum delivery of embolic agents is limited by the development of stasis and
subsequent non-target injury.
As DEB-TACE is performed through an endhole catheter with either stasis or substasis as an
endpoint. The current methodology is extremely subjective, lacks a quantifiable endpoint, and
results in various degrees of embolization on patients. Often this can result in repeat
procedures or the progression of tumor.
Recently, there has been FDA clearance of a new anti-reflux catheter, Surefire® Infusion
System (SIS, Westminster, CO). The current design has an expandable tip which collapses
during forward flow, and then dynamically seal off the vessel with reversal of flow,
analogous to a valve. SIS, with its expandable tip microcatheter, has been demonstrated
clinically to cause a slight decrease in intra-arterial pressure in the antegrade, or
downstream, vascular compartment. Although this device was designed primarily to prevent
retrograde reflux of embolic agents, the downstream blood pressure reduction may serve as a
biomarker on quantifying embolization.
The goal is to develop a method that: (1) allows maximum delivery of embolic spheres into the
tumor tissue to stasis without reflux; (2) enables direct real time numerical quantification
on the degree of embolization; and (3) provides an intra-procedural functional parameter
which could be used to guide the optimal therapeutic endpoints at the time of treatment.
;
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Recruiting |
NCT04209491 -
Interest of the Intervention of a Nurse Coordinator in Complex Care Pathway
|
||
Completed |
NCT03963206 -
Cabozantinib toLERANCE Study in HepatoCellular Carcinoma (CLERANCE)
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT03268499 -
TACE Emulsion Versus Suspension
|
Phase 2 | |
Recruiting |
NCT05263830 -
Glypican-3 as a Prognostic Factor in Patients With Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treated by Immunotherapy
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT05044676 -
Immune Cells as a New Biomarker of Response in Patients Treated by Immunotherapy for Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT05095519 -
Hepatocellular Carcinoma Imaging Using PSMA PET/CT
|
Phase 2 | |
Recruiting |
NCT05497531 -
Pilot Comparing ctDNA IDV vs. SPV Sample in Pts Undergoing Biopsies for Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Cancers
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT05068193 -
A Clinical Trial to Compare the Pharmacokinetics and Bioequivalence of "BR2008" With "BR2008-1" in Healthy Volunteers
|
Phase 1 | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT03781934 -
A Study to Evaluate MIV-818 in Patients With Liver Cancer Manifestations
|
Phase 1/Phase 2 | |
Terminated |
NCT03655613 -
APL-501 or Nivolumab in Combination With APL-101 in Locally Advanced or Metastatic HCC and RCC
|
Phase 1/Phase 2 | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT03170960 -
Study of Cabozantinib in Combination With Atezolizumab to Subjects With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Solid Tumors
|
Phase 1/Phase 2 | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT04242199 -
Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics, and Pharmacodynamics of INCB099280 in Participants With Advanced Solid Tumors
|
Phase 1 | |
Completed |
NCT04401800 -
Preliminary Antitumor Activity, Safety and Tolerability of Tislelizumab in Combination With Lenvatinib for Hepatocellular Carcinoma
|
Phase 2 | |
Withdrawn |
NCT05418387 -
A Social Support Intervention to Improve Treatment Among Hispanic Kidney and Liver Cancer Patients in Arizona
|
N/A | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT04039607 -
A Study of Nivolumab in Combination With Ipilimumab in Participants With Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma
|
Phase 3 | |
Terminated |
NCT03970616 -
A Study of Tivozanib in Combination With Durvalumab in Subjects With Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma
|
Phase 1/Phase 2 | |
Recruiting |
NCT03642561 -
Evaluation the Treatment Outcome for RFA in Patients With BCLC Stage B HCC in Comparison With TACE
|
Phase 2/Phase 3 | |
Recruiting |
NCT04118114 -
Phase II Study of PRL3-ZUMAB in Advanced Solid Tumors
|
Phase 2 | |
Recruiting |
NCT06239155 -
A Phase I/II Study of AST-3424 in Subjects With Advanced Solid Tumors
|
Phase 1/Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT03222076 -
Nivolumab With or Without Ipilimumab in Treating Patients With Resectable Liver Cancer
|
Phase 2 |