View clinical trials related to Hepatocellular Carcinoma.
Filter by:National, multicenter, retrospective, non-randomized observational study (Real World Evidence-RWE) with the purpose of analyzing the epidemiological profile of Hepatocellular Carcinomas (BCLC A, B or C), clinical management, progression profile and overall survival of castrated patients treated in national oncology care reference centers, within the last 6 years (between 2017 to 2022).
The trial is designed as a single-arm, open-label, phase I study investigating an off-the-shelf, multi-peptide-base HCC vaccine plus Montanide, combined with Durvalumab in patients with very early, early and intermediate stage of HCC. The investigational agents will be applied without concomitant anti-tumour therapy with the intention to reduce risk of recurrence/progression in patients who have received all indicated standard treatments.
The aim of this trial is to carry out the first prospective multicentric study which evaluates the efficacy and the safety of SBRT in HCC patients enlisted for LT and not suitable for other bridging interventional treatments (RF or TACE). The incidence of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is increasing worldwide and is currently the first indication for Liver transplantation (LT). HCC patients access to LT is not only determined by the underlying liver function but also by the alpha-fetoprotein (aFP) score which allows to better identify patients with high risk of recurrence. LT is the best curative treatment as it can cure both the tumor and the underlying liver disease. However, the access to LT is limited due to organ shortage and preserved liver function for the majority of the patients with HCC. Bridging therapies, such as ablation by radiofrequency (RF) or microwaves, or trans-arterial chemoembolization (TACE), are carried out routinely to prevent the risk of tumor progression and drop-out during the waiting time (the drop-out rate being 20%). Nevertheless, only 50 to 70% of patients in France will have access to these treatments due to specific contraindications. Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) has emerged as a non-invasive alternative and potentially efficient treatment of single or bilocular HCC. SBRT is a high-precision technique allowing to deliver a precise high dose irradiation on moving intrahepatic lesions. RTS is feasible only when the hepatic reserve is sufficient to avoid radic hepatitis. Advantages of SBRT, as compared to TACE or RF, are 1) to preserve the hepatic artery, which can be altered by TACE 2) to allow access to complex tumors locations or superficial lesions not feasible by RF 3) to avoid any tumor spread related to punctures 4) to avoid general anesthesia. However, SBRT has not been validated as bridging therapy before LT in a prospective study. Thus, this study is the first prospective multicentric study to evaluate this treatment modality in HCC patients enlisted for LT not suitable to RF or TACE.
Surgical resection and liver transplantation are the primary curative treatments for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, many patients are ineligible for these treatments due to advanced disease, social factors, or limited availability of liver donors. Therefore, for patients with unresectable HCC, locoregional therapies like transarterial radioembolization (TARE with Y90) are considered the next best non-operative option, especially when the cancer remains confined to the liver. Despite the use of these liver-directed therapies, relapse rates and mortality remain high, underscoring the need for new predictive biomarkers and therapeutic targets, including immune modulation. The rationale behind NP-101 (TQ formula) stems from its immune modulatory properties as a potent drug derived from a natural substance, black seed or Nigella Sativa. Previous studies have demonstrated its immune modulation and anti-cancer effects, showing promise in preclinical models of HCC. In a randomized phase 2 study conducted in Covid patients, NP-101 exhibited safety and significantly increased T effector cells (CD4+ and CD8+ T lymphocytes), resulting in accelerated recovery. The immune modulation effect of NP-101, observed in the Covid study, and its potential to enhance CD4+ and CD8+ T effector lymphocytes can potentially modify the immune microenvironment and improve outcomes in locally advanced HCC patients undergoing Y90 treatment. This study will investigate the safety, efficacy and maximum tolerated dose of NP-101 in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma. The dosing scheme for NP-101 in this study will follow a Bayesian Optimal Interval design. Based on the target dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) rate of 30% and assuming a 3+3 design, three subjects will be sequentially enrolled at each of the 3 dose levels (beginning with 3g) until at least one DLT occurs. If no DLTs occur, dosing will be escalated to the next dose level for the next three enrolled subjects. At either of the two dose levels, if 1 DLT occurs, three more subjects will be enrolled at that dose level. If no DLTs occur in these subjects, three more subjects will be enrolled at the next highest dose level. Dosing escalation will be stopped if two or more total DLTs occur at any dose level. The maximum tolerated dose (MTD) will be one dose level below the dose level at which two or more DLTs occurred.
The goal of this first in human clinical trial is to test BI-1910 administered as single agent and in combination with pembrolizumab in subjects with advanced/metastatic solid tumors whose disease has progressed after standard therapy. The main questions it aims to answer are: - how safe and tolerable is BI-1910 - what is maximum tolerated or administrated dose - to determine recommended dose for further clinical trials Participants will receive infusions of BI-1910 alone or combination with pembrolizumab every 3 weeks.
This is a single-arm prospective phase II clinical trial to investigate the efficacy and safety of adjuvant simultaneouslyintegrated boost radiotherapy following narrow-margin(<1cm) hepatectomy in patients with HCC. Eligibility patients will receive IMRT or VMAT to high risk area of tumor bed and tumor bed. The prescription dose to 95% GTVtb boost was planned at 55-60Gy, with PTV 45-50Gy, in 23-25 fractions, mainly depending on the dose constraints of OARs. The primary endpoint is the 3-year OS, the secondary endpoints are disease-free survival, patterns of failure, toxic events and local control rate.
In this study, the investigators will detect hepatocellular carcinoma lesions using fluoescence imaging with ITGA6 targeting probes during tumor resection surgery. The aim is to evaluate wether intraoperative fluorescence imaging targeting ITGA6 can help to improve the detction effect of hepatocellular carcinoma, and finally help the accurate surgical resection. The main purposes of this study include: 1. To raise the detection rate of hepatocellular carcinoma intraoperatively using the novel NIR-II fluorescence molecular imaging and the ITGA6 targeting probe. 2. To validate the safety and effectiveness of the proposed ITGA6 targeting probes for clinical application.
The goal of this clinical trial is to compare CT scan of the coverage of tumors treated with TACE using End Hole catheters to those treated with the TriNav catheter that alters tissue pressure. Both catheters are FDA approved for delivery of TACE. • Is there a difference in CT appearance with delivery in the type of catheter used during the TACE procedure? Participants will be asked to undergo a TACE procedure, a CT scan and review of their medical record to compare End Hole and TriNav catheters during TACE procedures.
Our previous study showed that hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy plus lenvatinib and toripalimab improved the survival of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. However, Leep 002 study showded that lenvatinib plus PD-1 antibody is not superior to lenvatinib alone for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. Thus, wo conduct this study to compare hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy plus lenvatinib and toripalimab with hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy plus lenvatinib for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma.
Systemic therapy is the primary option for managing advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The combination of atezolizumab and bevacizumab (A+B) has emerged as the first-choice treatment for advanced HCC(IM brave 150). The ORIENT-32 study, also reported an ORR of 24% for sintilimab plus a bevacizumab biosimilar (S+B) versus 8% for sorafenib, with significantly longer OS and PFS. Based on those therapeutic advantages over sorafenib, both the A+B and S+B regimens were approved as first-line treatment options for advanced HCC in China. These two trials had very similar designs but included different target populations. Our previous studies have demonstrated that a novel treatment approach combining transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) with hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) has high efficacy in patients with potentially resectable HCC or portal vein tumor thrombus. However, it remains unknown whether combining immune checkpoint inhibitors and macromolecular VEGF-targeted therapy with transvascular local interventions could improve patient prognosis in uHCC.