View clinical trials related to Hepatocellular Carcinoma.
Filter by:This single-center, pilot study (phase IIa) will evaluate the safety, feasibility, and efficacy of FMT from patients with HCC who responded to PD-(L)1-based immunotherapy to patients with HCC who failed to respond to atezolizumab/bevacizumab.
To compare the safety and efficacy of unmodified RAK cells and anti-TIM-3 blocked autologous RAK cells in preventing postoperative recurrence of HCC by postoperative TACE therapy combined with immune cell therapy.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of mRNA vaccine for HBV-positive Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma.
The effectiveness and safety of fully covered metal stent in malignant biliary obstruction caused by HCC are still unknown. These would be clarified in this prospective cohort study.
The goal of this clinical trial is to learn about advanced liver and bile duct cancers. The main question it aims to answer is: If the combination of Domvanalimab and Zimberelimab are effective in treating advanced hepatobiliary cancers that have failed prior treatment.
The goal of this clinical trial is to test the outcomes of HBsAg(+) patients in the treatments of NAs vs NAs plus IFN . The main questions it aims to answer are: 1. Clinical effect analysis of nucleoside analogs (NAs) group a group and NAs plus interferon group after 48 weeks of treatment; 2. Repetitive effect and time effect of different drug treatment at different follow-up time points; 3. To evaluate the difference of therapeutic effect of NAs or NAs combined with interferon; 4. Follow up and compare the incidence of early liver cancer in each group. Participants will be asked to receive NAs or NAs combined with interferon treatments, and Regular blood sampling and color ultrasound examination. Researchers will compare control group to see if occurrence of liver cancer.
This is a prospective clinical study aiming to test the safety and efficacy of lenvatinib in combination with Aurora kinase A inhibitor VIC-1911 in participate with lenvatinib-unresponsive or lenvatinib-resistant hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC).
Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) plus antiangiogenic agents can achieve better efficacy than sorafenib in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) within a certain period of time, but more than half of the patients are still insensitive to the treatment. There is no evidence-based basis for second-line treatment after the progression of the disease.In view of the effectiveness of Hepatic arterial infusion (HAIC) in the first-line treatment of HCC in the Chinese population, this study intends to launch a prospective intervention study to explore the efficacy and safety of HAIC treatment in patients with advanced HCC after the failure of ICIs and antiangiogenic agents combination therapy, and to provide high-level evidence for optimizing the second-line treatment of advanced HCC in the future.
The goal of this study is Utility of abbrevational magnetic resonance imaging as a screening tool for hepatocellular carcinoma in cirrhotic patients. The primary objective of the study is: • HCC detection rate of US vs AMRI in cirrhotic patients The secondary objective of the study are: - False referral rate of US vs AMRI: false referral will be defined as lack of HCC on complete MRI despite a positive US or AMRI. - Positive predictive value of US vs AMRI: The positive predictive value will be defined as the number of patients with true positive results in patients with positive US/AMRI. Participants will be evaluated by two rounds of screening 6 months apart using paired US and non-enhanced AMRI.
The goal of this evaluate short, medium and long term outcome of the different embolization techniques in patients with primary and secondary hepatic tumors. The main aim is to evaluate progression free survival following embolization in this study population or evaluate residual hepatic volume in cases in which these techniques are used to induce liver regeneration. This study is an observational registry - all patients will follow their normal therapeutic and treatment scheme as per clinical practice, without any additional intervention.