Clinical Trials Logo

Hemorrhoids clinical trials

View clinical trials related to Hemorrhoids.

Filter by:

NCT ID: NCT04945408 Completed - Hemorrhoids Clinical Trials

Longitudinal Description of Hemorrhoidal Pathology

DeLPH
Start date: June 15, 2020
Phase:
Study type: Observational

Hemorrhoidal disease is a common cause of gastroenterology visits. In the United States, it is considered the 3rd most common gastrointestinal diagnosis with nearly 4 million scheduled or emergency visits. In France, self-reported questionnaires estimate that one person in five has suffered at least one hemorrhoidal attack in the past year.

NCT ID: NCT04944407 Completed - Hemorrhoids Clinical Trials

Minimal Invasive Laser Hemorrhoidoplasty vs Conventional Excisional Hemorrhoidectomy in II-III Grade Hemorrhoidal Disease

Start date: January 1, 2017
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

the study aims to evaluate the effectiveness and long term outcomes of laser hemorroidoplasty versus conventional milligan morgan hemorrhoidectomy in II-III degree hemorroidal disease.

NCT ID: NCT04943666 Recruiting - Haemorrhoids Clinical Trials

The Russian Multicenter Observational Study "Evaluation of the HDQ for the Diagnosis of Hemorrhoidal Disease ( HDQ )

HDQ
Start date: July 12, 2021
Phase:
Study type: Observational

Currently in Russia there is no available self-evaluating tools with appropriate diagnostic accuracy for screening of patients with haemorrhoids. Therefore, the primary objective of this study is to evaluate a new patient specific questionnaire (HDQ) with appropriate sensitivity and specificity to use for screening of patients with haemorrhoids in Russia. Once evaluated, the HDQ will be used in clinical practice for wider screening of haemorrhoids in population and for increasing patients' awareness of the disease and prompting them to seek professional advice. Secondary objectives of the study are to describe a prevalence of haemorrhoids among patients in the study and to describe a prevalence of the symptoms of haemorrhoids among patients in the study

NCT ID: NCT04896268 Recruiting - Hemorrhoids Clinical Trials

Efficacy and Safety of RAdiofrequency Versus HAL- RAR DOppler in Hemorrhoidal Pathology

RADO
Start date: January 3, 2023
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Haemorrhoids are composed of tissue rich in blood vessels and are present in all individuals inside the anus (internal haemorrhoids) or under the skin of the anus (external haemorrhoids). Haemorrhoidal disease (HD) occurs when haemorrhoids become troublesome and cause symptoms such as pain, bleeding, prolapse or oozing. In case of failure of medical treatment, instrumental procedures or extensive disease, surgical treatment can be considered. There are two classic surgical techniques. The first is the pedicle haemorrhoidectomy of the Milligan and Morgan type. The second classic surgical technique is the Longo stapled anopexy. Recently, less invasive surgical techniques such as arterial ligation (HAL, with or without Doppler) followed by recto-anal repair (RAR for "Recto Anal Repair") and sometimes associated with mucopexy, which allows the excess mucosa to be ligated and the muco-haemorrhoidal tissue to be fixed to the rectal wall, have developed. The use of radiofrequency current (Rafaelo technique) in the treatment of haemorrhoidal disease is an innovative technique of haemorrhoidal thermocoagulation. It is a mini-invasive technique, which can be performed under sedation or short general anaesthesia (GA), with little pain, allowing a rapid return to normal life and a short time off work. Although this technique is already used in other European countries: Poland, Germany, Belgium, Great Britain (UK), there is now a Polish, German, Spanish and English study in the process of publication. There have been no studies in France to evaluate this new technique and assess its good tolerance, the duration of work stoppage, the improvement in quality of life and the evaluation of its effectiveness.

NCT ID: NCT04881344 Not yet recruiting - Hemorrhoids Clinical Trials

Mucopexy Versus Laser Hemorrhoidoplasty for the Treatment of Hemorrhoidal Disease

MuLa
Start date: June 2021
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Hemorrhoidal disease is a frequent anorectal disorder and the main reason for a visit to a coloproctologist. Hemorrhoids are present in healthy individuals. However, they can become pathologic, manifesting with pain, prolapse, itching, bleeding or soiling. Initially, they can be managed conservatively. When this failed to cure the symptoms, surgical therapy is indicated. For grade II (hemorrhoids prolapsing during straining but reducing spontaneously) or grade III (hemorrhoids prolapsing during straining but requiring manual reduction), laser hemorrhoidoplasty or mucopexy are safe and efficient procedures to treat hemorrhoids. However, the optimal treatment is still under debate. Recently, a randomized controlled trial reported lower recurrence and faster return to work associated with laser therapy. We aimed to compare both therapies, to assess the benefits of laser therapy for the treatment of hemorrhoidal disease symptoms, using a validated score.

NCT ID: NCT04863963 Completed - Hemorrhoids Clinical Trials

Milligan-Morgan Versus Dearterialization With Mucopexy

EMODART3
Start date: July 1, 2021
Phase:
Study type: Observational [Patient Registry]

Nowadays, there are several methods that can be used for grade III hemorrhoidal disease, according to Goligher classificiation. Milligan Morgan hemorrhoidectomy is considered the most effective treatment in many centers, even if characterized by marked postoperative pain. Among the minimally invasive alternative procedures, the transanal hemorrhoidal dearterialization (HAL - ligation of the hemorrhoidal artery) Doppler-guided or without Doppler, associated with mucopexy, seems to gain success, with promising results but still awaiting high-grade scientific evidence. On the basis of this background, we decided to carry out a multi-center survey on a national scale, retrospectively including patients diagnosed with Goligher's grade III hemorrhoidal disease, surgically treated with hemorrhoidectomy or dearterialization.

NCT ID: NCT04708678 Completed - Hemorrhoids Clinical Trials

Long-term Efficacy of Doppler Ligation With Mucopexy in the Treatment of Internal Hemorrhoidal Disease

HEM_THD
Start date: January 12, 2021
Phase:
Study type: Observational

A classic distinction is made between internal and external hemorrhoidal pathology. External hemorrhoids can present with thrombosis, which causes painful swelling; internal hemorrhoids by rectal bleeding, prolapse, and more rarely thrombosis. Hemorrhoidal pathology is one of the most frequent reasons for consultation in proctology. Its prevalence is probably underestimated due to taboos and the frequent self-medication of patients, but it is considered high in the general population. The therapeutic management of internal or external hemorrhoidal pathology is primarily based on hygiene and dietetic measures and regularization of transit. In the case of external hemorrhoidal pathology, treatment may also include Non-Steroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs (NSAIDs) and topical treatment (anesthetic or topical corticosteroid). For internal hemorrhoidal pathology, when these measures are insufficient or when prolapse is present from the outset, instrumental treatment can be offered, allowing the bleeding and / or prolapse to be treated up to grade 3 maximum. This treatment includes sclerosis (less and less practiced), infrared photocoagulation and rubber band ligation. In 10 to 20% of cases, when the prolapse is irreducible, there is anemia of hemorrhoidal origin or the symptoms persist despite well-conducted treatment, surgical treatment may be offered. The reference surgical technique in France and in Europe is tripedicular hemorrhoidectomy according to the Milligan and Morgan technique, developed at Saint Marks Hospital in London, first published in 1937. It has the advantage of to be the most effective technique, with a low rate of postoperative recurrence and treats both internal and external hemorrhoidal pathology. However, the postoperative period is painful, requires local care and requires cessation of activity for several weeks. On the other hand, there is a risk of potentially serious complications and permanent sequelae: acute retention of urine (2.1-15%), hemorrhage (0.6-5.4%), anal stenosis (6%) , infection (0.5-5%) and anal incontinence (0-6%). Patient selection is essential and contraindicates hemorrhoidectomy in cases of anal incontinence, active suppuration, chronic inflammatory bowel disease, anal intercourse or a history of pelvic radiotherapy. As an alternative to hemorrhoidectomy, and its painful and restrictive consequences, new minimally invasive surgical techniques that have proven their effectiveness in the treatment of internal hemorrhoidal pathology have emerged over the past twenty years. The two main ones are Longo circular stapling hemorrhoidopexy and Doppler-controlled arterial ligations with mucopexy. Several studies have shown that Longo's hemorrhoidopexy causes less postoperative pain and allows a faster return to activity than after a tripedicular hemorrhoidectomy. On the other hand, the rate of recurrence of hemorrhoidal pathology was higher. This rate was 41% at 12 years and 47.5% at 15 years. In addition, specific and severe complications have been described as rectal perforations, rectovaginal fistulas, perirectal hematomas, pelvic cellulitis, peritonitis and death. Several comparative studies have shown that arterial ligation under Doppler control with mucopexy was less painful postoperatively than hemorrhoidopexy by circular stapling and that the short- and medium-term efficacy was generally similar. In addition, the postoperative consequences of arterial ligatures under Doppler control with mucopexy seem harmless, with none of the major complications described after stapled hemorrhoidopexy. For these reasons, arterial ligation is now tending to replace hemorrhoidopexy with circular stapling. The objective of our study is to assess the rate of recurrence of long-term hemorrhoidal pathology in patients who have had arterial ligatures under Doppler control with mucopexy at our center. The results will help guide the practitioner and the patient in the choice of surgical treatment.

NCT ID: NCT04692194 Completed - Hemorrhoids Clinical Trials

Study "HEMORROIDAL SURGERY AND Chronic Inflammatory Bowel Disease"

CHRMICI
Start date: December 28, 2020
Phase:
Study type: Observational

Hemorrhoidal surgery is considered potentially harmful in patients with chronic inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Patients with Crohn's disease may have ano-perineal involvement during the course of the disease or even before diagnosis. In addition, patients with IBD (Crohn's or RectoColitis Haemorrhagic, UC) may have rectal involvement. In both cases, hemorrhoidal surgery can be harmful to the anorectal level. However, recent data from the literature has proven to be reassuring. Indeed, the latest studies published on this subject have shown that hemorrhoidal surgery can be performed in a large majority of patients with IBD, especially when the disease is quiescent. The main objective is to assess the morbidity of hemorrhoidal surgery in IBD patients who have been operated on at our center. Postoperative complications will be the main elements sought in the study. The secondary objective is to search for predictive factors of complications from hemorrhoidal surgery in patients with IBD. This requires an exhaustive collection of clinical data.

NCT ID: NCT04675177 Completed - Hemorrhoids Clinical Trials

Polidocanol Foam VS Artery Ligation in Hemorrhoidal Disease

Start date: September 1, 2019
Phase: Phase 2/Phase 3
Study type: Interventional

Background: Hemorrhoidal disease is extremely frequent in the adult population and, as a benign pathology, the treatment should be guided by the patient's symptoms. Treatment of hemorrhoidal disease includes a conservative approach, office-based treatments and surgery. This study is aimed to evaluate and compare the efficacy and safety of the treatment of hemorrhoidal disease with non-surgical office-based method polidocanol foam sclerotherapy (SP) and the surgical technique doppler-guided hemorrhoidal artery ligation with recto-anal repair. Methods: Prospective, unicentric study including patients with symptomatic hemorrhoidal disease grade II and III refractory to conservative therapy, submitted either to SP (n=24) or to HAL-RAR procedure (n=21), during a recruitment period of 6 months. Patients were evaluated for efficacy (Sodergren's scale of symptoms and severity of bleeding) and safety (complications and implication in personal and professional life), up to one month after treatment. In follow-up period (6 months) participants were evaluated for hemorrhoidal disease recurrence.

NCT ID: NCT04667169 Completed - Hemorrhoids Clinical Trials

Bleeding in Laser Haemorrhoidoplasty

Start date: January 2015
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Treatment options for haemorrhoid can be classified mainly into lifestyle modification, medical and procedural. Laser haemorrhoidoplasty (LHP) is a minimally invasive procedure which is effective in treating grade 2-4 haemorrhoids. However, one of the significant complications is post-operative bleeding. Some surgeons supplemented haemorrhoidal artery ligation (HAL) to help minimize post-operative bleeding, however, its effectiveness has not been formally evaluated. This study aims to compare the effectiveness of supplementation of HAL to LHP in reducing the incidence of post-operative bleeding. It was hypothesize that supplementation of HAL to LHP is not effective in reducing the post-operative bleeding incidence and is unnecessary. The study was designed as a double-blind, randomized controlled trial involving 78 patients who underwent laser haemorrhoidoplasty in Universiti Malaya Medical Centre, Malaysia from November 2016 to October 2018. The study compared the post-operative bleeding incidence of laser haemorrhoidoplasty (LHP) only (n=38) versus laser haemorrhoidoplasty with haemorrhoidal artery ligation (LHP + HAL) (n=38). Assessment of bleeding using verbal rating scale (VRS) and Clavien-Dindo score is made at post-operative 24 hours, one week and six weeks. Pain score, the presence of perianal swelling and operation time were documented.