View clinical trials related to Hemorrhoids.
Filter by:Hemorrhoidal disease, characterized by symptomatic enlargement and distal displacement of anal cushions, has been a subject of recognition and management for centuries. The etymology of "hemorrhoid" is traced back to the Greek words haima (blood) and rhoos (flow). Prevalent in over 20% of the population across various life stages, this anorectal condition impacts both genders. The multifaceted development of the disease incorporates theories encompassing abnormal dilation of hemorrhoidal plexuses, distension of arteriovenous anastomoses, prolapse of anal pads, and a myriad of genetic, anatomical, dietary, and lifestyle factors. Manifestations range from venous distension to bleeding and thrombosis, with classification based on location (internal/external/combined) and degree of prolapse (grade 1-4). Upon comprehensive history-taking and examinations, including digital rectal and proctoscope assessments, a definitive diagnosis is established, leading to the treatment phase. Although outpatient procedures demonstrate efficacy, patients may persist with pain and discomfort. Medical intervention assumes significance for stages 1 and 2, incorporating approaches such as rubber-band ligation, injection sclerotherapy, and dietary modifications. Micronized Purified Flavonoid Fraction (MPFF), integral to hemorrhoid treatment, has been scrutinized for its ability to mitigate pathogenic processes culminating in acute bleeding. The stagnation of blood in vascular plexuses prompts an inflammatory response, activating white cells and increasing vessel wall permeability. MPFF's flavonoid compounds are posited to alleviate bleeding by augmenting venous tone, reducing stasis, inhibiting inflammatory mediators, and enhancing lymphatic drainage[8]. Multiple trials substantiate MPFF's efficacy in ceasing bleeding, alleviating symptoms, and preventing hemorrhoid relapse. Aescin, a saponin mixture found in Aesculus hippocastanum (horse chestnut). The primary active component, β-aescin, contributes to the plant's medicinal attributes. Experimental investigations in animal models underscore its anti-edematous, anti-inflammatory, and venotonic properties, attributed to molecular mechanisms facilitating ion entry into channels and elevating venous tension. While the therapeutic benefits of aescin for hemorrhoids are acknowledged, the absence of randomized control trials impedes the conclusive validation of its efficacy. In the realm of diverse treatment options, this proposed randomized controlled trial aims to assess the comparative effectiveness of combining aescin with MPFF versus MPFF alone in managing hemorrhoid-related symptoms. The study aspires to furnish valuable insights for refining therapeutic strategies in the management of hemorrhoids and enhancing patient outcomes.
2.1 Main objective: To observe the short-term and long-term recurrence rates of various endoscopic minimally invasive treatment methods for internal hemorrhoids and different time points of endoscopic minimally invasive treatment for internal hemorrhoids in patients with grade I-III internal hemorrhoids 2.2 Secondary objective: To observe the safety and efficacy of endoscopic minimally invasive treatment of internal hemorrhoids
Endovascular embolisation is already a common procedure for bleeding haemorrhoids in the acute setting, where surgical options are not possible or have been exhausted. This pilot study aims to add to the small body of evidence that transarterial embolisation of symptomatic haemorrhoids is also safe and effective in the elective setting, providing a good alternative to conventional surgical management. This is a day case procedure that is performed under local anaesthetic. For selected patients, this presents a less invasive management option with reduced potential morbidity. For a health care system under significant financial stress, this provides a potential means of cost improvement, the extent of which this study will try and quantify. A series of 20 selected patients will be recruited to undergo this procedure and then followed up for 24 months. The long-term goal of this pilot study is to form the basis of a national registry of such procedures.
The goal of this prospective clinical trial is to compare the outcomes of several technical options of open hemorrhoidectomy in patients with symptomatic hemorrhoids. Randomly allocated participants will undergo surgical treatment for hemorrhoids with one technical option of open hemorrhoidecomy: with 'cold' scalpel or electrosurgical instruments. All information to evaluate outcomes between the groups will be collected before surgery and 1 week and 30 days after surgery.
Hemorrhoidal disease (HD) is the most common proctological disease with a prevalence rate that can reach approximately 4.4% of the population, with a particular peak in individuals aged between 45 and 65 years. The most common presentation of HD is painless rectal bleeding occurring during or immediately after defecation. Pain is rare in case of uncomplicated HD and may be present in case of external hemorrhoidal thrombosis. The decision-making to treat Hemorrhoidal thrombosis usually depends on the timing of the onset of symptoms, with the surgical treatment favored if the onset of symptoms occurs within 72 hours. Mesoglycan, a natural preparation of glycosaminoglycans (GAGs), is a polysaccharide complex rich in sulfur radicals. It is composed of heparan sulphate (47.5%), dermatan sulphate (35.5%), chondroitin sulfate (8.5%) and slow heparin (8.5%). Mesoglycan exerts antithrombotic activity (activation of antithrombin III and heparin cofactor II) and profibrinolytic (stimulation of the activator tissue plasminogen) decreasing plasma concentrations of fibrinogen without affecting the prothrombin time, the time of partial thromboplastin or the remaining coagulation parameters. The rationale of this double-blind randomized controlled clinical trial is to confirm/evaluate the efficacy and safety of mesoglycan versus placebo in reducing the symptoms of hemorrhoidal disease and their impact on quality of life.
The aim of this single-center prospective observational trial is to study the influence of physical and psychological factors on the intensity of pain syndrome after anorectal interventions and to determine the association between the physiological pain threshold before surgery and the level of pain syndrome after anorectal surgery. Participants undergoing surgical treatment for anorectal diseases will be asked to complete the questionnaires before and after surgery, all information will be collected to identify risk factors for severe pain syndrome after surgery. The pain threshold test will be conducted to determine the association with pain after surgery.
Haemorrhoids are the most common proctologic disease, affecting up to 36% of people in the developed world. Sclerotherapy is defined as the injection of sclerosing agents at the apex of the internal hemorrhoidal complex, above the dentate line, leading to scarring, fibrosis, and fixation of the hemorrhoids. Sclerotherapy as a treatment of internal hemorrhoids has been used for a long time by surgeons, using proctoscopic exposure. Even though flexible instruments can be expected to have better manoeuvrability and target site exposure. There is no consensus amongst the major guidelines as to which grade of haemorrhoid that sclerotherapy should be used, whether it is equivalent or inferior to rubber bad ligation (RBL), whether sclerotherapy should be used at all for the treatment of IH, what is the effect of PHT on hemorrhoid prevalence and propensity to bleed, differentiation of internal hemorrhoids from rectal varices, data on EBL or EST in cirrhotics with hemorrhoids, safety of endotherapy with underlying coagulopathy and concerns for infectious complications.
The study aims to compare the pain , duration of intervention and long term outcomes of laser hemorrhoidoplasty versus open surgical hemorrhoidectomy
Haemorrhoids are variceal dilatations of the anal and perianal venous plexus and often develop secondary to the persistently elevated venous pressure within the haemorrhoidal plexus . The classical position of haemorrhoids corresponds to three positions which are the right anterior, right posterior and the left lateral areas of the anal canal. Haemorrhoids may be external or internal. External haemorrhoids are covered with skin and internal haemorrhoids are covered with anal mucous membranes. The grading system used by Banov to classify internal haemorrhoids is one of the most common grading systems used by clinicians and is used to guide therapeutic practice. Internal haemorrhoids can be divided into four categories depending on the degree of prolapse (the protrusion of the haemorrhoid through the anus). The most widely accepted classification is the Goligher classification: - Bleeding but no prolapse (grade I). - Hemorrhoidal piles prolapse through the anus during straining, but they reduce spontaneously (grade II). - Hemorrhoidal piles prolapse through the anus during straining and require manual reduction (grade III). - The prolapse is irreducible (grade IV). Most symptoms and signs which patients present with arise from internal haemorrhoids, derive from structural changes of the normal anatomic padding (enlarged internal haemorrhoids) and are generally associated with chronic straining either due to constipation, diarrhoea or prolonged periods trying to defecate. They are also common during pregnancy and childbirth.
Hemorrhoids is one of the most common anorectal diseases, can occur at any age and gender. Hemorrhoids generally do not have very serious clinical manifestations, but often bring huge life pressure and psychological burden to patients, so effective treatment is necessary. Traditional surgical treatment techniques, such as hemorrhoidectomy, may have defects such as anal pain and long recovery time. Recently, endoscopic hemorrhoid treatment has become a safe, effective and rapid rehabilitation treatment. Treatment of hemorrhoids treatment including endoscopic sclerotherapy, endoscopic rubber band ligation, endoscopic sclerotherapy combined with rubber band ligation, the three kinds of treatment methods have their own advantages, but existing research at home and abroad is still less and the comparison of various treatment methods lack of consensus. Our study is to compare the three kinds of treatment methods.