View clinical trials related to Hematologic Neoplasms.
Filter by:CP-MGD024-01 is a Phase 1, open-label, multi-center study of MGD024 as a single agent in patients with select blood cancers that have not responded to treatment with standard therapies or who have relapsed after treatment. The study is designed to determine the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics (affect of the body on the drug), pharmacodynamic (affect of the drug on the body), immunogenicity (development of antibodies against the drug), and preliminary anti-cancer effect of MGD024. Patients will receive treatment with MGD024 in consecutive 28-day cycles for a study treatment period of up to 12 cycles (approximately 1 year) or until treatment or study discontinuation criteria are met. Response assessments will be performed after Cycle 1 and then after every even numbered cycle starting with Cycle 2 until progression or study treatment discontinuation. Patients will be checked for side effects throughout the study.
Previous studies had found that the microbe in intestinal after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation(allo-HSCT) were closely associated with overall survival and post-transplantation complications, especially graft versus host disease (GVHD).Due to the limited data on the association of microbiota composition with chronic GVHD(cGVHD) after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, the relationship between microbiota composition and post-transplantation complications, especially cGVHD, needs to be further evaluated.Detailed studies of the microbiome and host immune system will lead to the discovery of microbiome markers for early identification of patients at high risk for cGVHD. This may regulate patients' gut microbiota in an individualized manner to achieve optimal treatment outcomes while avoiding severe post-transplant cGVHD. We will operate a prospective, multicenter, nonrandomized, observational study. Patients will be asked to provide blood and stool samples during allo-HSCT.
To explore current practices of nutrition and metabolic screening, assessment and management prior to Haematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant (HSCT) in UK and ROI transplant centres. Nutrition and metabolic parameters assessed in the survey include glycaemic control, lipid function, liver function, nutritional screening, nutritional assessment, nutrition intervention (tube feeding, diet, micronutrient) and exercise. This work will be used to inform the design of a UK dual centre feasibility study of personalised nutrition and metabolic care for HSCT patients prior to transplantation.
This study will evaluate the safety and efficacy of 1A46 in adult patients with advanced CD20 and/or CD19 positive B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) or acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL).
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety, pharmacokinetics (PK) and preliminary efficacy of oral nemtabrutinib in Chinese participants at least 18 years of age who have Relapsed/Refractory hematologic malignancies.
This is a Phase I, Open-Label, Multi-Center, Dose Finding Study to Investigate the Safety, Pharmacokinetics, and Preliminary Efficacy of ATG-018 (ATR inhibitor) Treatment in Patients with Advanced Solid Tumors and Hematological Malignancies .
Prospective single-center observational study assessing prevalence of FID (Laboratory work-up) and Quality of Life (Questionnaire) in adult patients with oncological and with haematological malignancies within four weeks prior to disease-directed therapy.
This is a non-interventional, long-term safety study of allogeneic CAR-T cell therapy in patients who have participated in a prior Caribou-sponsored clinical study, in a special access program, or in another study such as an IIT. Its purpose of is to collect long-term observational data to identify and understand potential late side effects in patients who have received CAR-T cell therapies.
Background: People with blood cancers often receive blood or bone marrow transplants. But even with these treatments, the risk of relapse is high. Researchers want to see if giving the transplant recipient an infusion of lymphocytes (a type of white blood cell) from their transplant donor early after the transplant can reduce that risk. Objective: To learn if giving donor lymphocytes early after a transplant will help reduce the risk of relapse for people with certain blood cancers. Eligibility: Adults aged 18-65 with high-risk leukemia, lymphoma, myelodysplastic syndrome, or multiple myeloma that does not respond well to standard treatments and/or has a high risk of relapse. Healthy potential bone marrow and lymphocyte donor relatives aged 12 and older are also needed. Design: Participants will be screened with: Physical exam Blood and urine tests Spinal tap Eye exam Dental exam Heart and lung tests Imaging scans. A radioactive substance may be injected in their arm if a PET scan is needed. Bone marrow aspiration and biopsy Some screening tests will be repeated during the study. Participants will stay at the NIH hospital for about 4 weeks. They will receive a central venous catheter. They will get chemotherapy and other drugs starting 6 days before transplant. Then they will have their transplant. They will receive donor white blood cells 7 days later. They will give blood, bone marrow, urine, and stool samples for research. They must stay near NIH for at least 100 days after transplant. Participants will have periodic follow-up visits for 5 years. Healthy donors will have 2-3 visits. They will give blood, bone marrow, white blood cells, and stool samples for research. Participation will last for 5 years....
Cancer survivors have unique healthcare needs including risk for serious late effects, ongoing surveillance, lifestyle modifications to reduce second cancer risk, and psychosocial support. Nearly 70% have at least one comorbid chronic condition in addition to cancer. Comorbidities pose significant challenges to the delivery of quality cancer care because they adversely affect and are affected by cancer treatment. Medically underserved patients have the highest burden of multiple chronic conditions and are at increased risk for poor outcomes during and after cancer treatment. As medically underserved cancer patients may lack healthcare knowledge and access to supportive care, their health outcomes and care transitions might be improved by enhancing communication and collaboration between their oncologists and primary care providers (PCPs). This study tests and evaluates a novel shared care model for cancer survivors with chronic comorbidities, called OPTIMISE (Oncology-Primary Care Partnership to Improve Comprehensive Survivorship Care) in the largest safety-net healthcare system in Houston, Texas. Three-hundred newly diagnosed breast, GI, and hematological cancer patients who are being treated with curative intent and who have comorbidities requiring ongoing management during cancer treatment will complete baseline surveys and be randomized to either OPTIMISE or Usual Medical Care (UMC). Patients receiving UMC will receive their cancer treatment, as directed by their oncologist, a survivorship care plan (SCP) at the end of active treatment, and surveillance visits with their oncologist based on national guidelines. Patients in OPTIMISE will 1) have an oncology nurse navigator assigned to their care team at diagnosis to facilitate oncologist-PCP communication and continuity of care; 2) receive coordinated care between their oncologist and PCP throughout cancer treatment and surveillance facilitated by a structured communication and referral process; 3) receive a survivorship care plan (SCP) at the end of treatment that incorporates comorbidity management; and, 4) receive a risk-stratified shared care model of post-treatment surveillance where one or more routine oncologist follow-up visits is replaced by a PCP visit. Aim 1a evaluates the impact of OPTIMISE on patient chronic disease self-management (primary outcome) and quality of life (secondary outcome). Aim 1b explores the effects of OPTIMISE on healthcare use and patient unmet needs during and after active cancer treatment. Aim 2 examines the effects of OPTIMISE on oncologist and PCP attitudes and coordination of care. Aim 3 seeks to elucidate patient- and system-level factors that may influence implementation outcomes. OPTIMISE shifts the timing of thinking about survivorship to point of diagnosis and seeks to develop a clinical infrastructure to support continuity of care from cancer diagnosis through post-treatment survivorship. If found effective, OPTIMISE could be expanded to other cancers, igniting a potentially rich area of research. It may also have significant downstream impact in other medical settings by enhancing care transitions from specialty to primary care.