Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

NCT number NCT02505425
Other study ID # X140813007
Secondary ID
Status Completed
Phase N/A
First received
Last updated
Start date November 30, 2015
Est. completion date May 10, 2019

Study information

Verified date January 2022
Source University of Alabama at Birmingham
Contact n/a
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

Advanced heart failure affects nearly 6 million Americans, and less is known about how this illness affects the 80% of heart failure patients who are 65 years and older because research tends to focus on younger patients. Older patients with heart failure and their family caregivers, rarely have access to palliative supportive care services because the disease is unpredictable and palliative treatment may not be provided until after other medical treatments have been tried. Investigators are studying whether palliative care provided when advanced heart failure patients are still well will result in better quality of life, mood and less symptom distress compared to usual or standard heart failure care. Specific Aims and Hypotheses: Specific Aim 1: Determine whether ENABLE CHF-PC leads to higher advanced heart failure patient-reported quality of life (QOL) and mood (depression/anxiety); and lower symptom burden and resource use (e.g. hospital admissions and days, emergency visits) through 16 weeks post baseline. • Hypothesis 1: Intervention participants will experience higher QOL and mood, and lower symptom burden and resource use through 16 weeks post baseline compared with those receiving usual HF care. Specific Aim 2: Determine whether ENABLE CHF-PC leads to higher caregiver-reported QOL, mood (anxiety/depression), and self-reported health and lower caregiver burden through 16 weeks post baseline. • Hypothesis 2: Intervention caregivers will report higher QOL, mood, and self-reported health, and lower caregiver burden through 16 weeks post baseline.


Description:

As described.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Completed
Enrollment 573
Est. completion date May 10, 2019
Est. primary completion date October 20, 2018
Accepts healthy volunteers No
Gender All
Age group 50 Years and older
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria: 1. Able to read and understand English 2. NYHF III/IV heart failure (physician-determined) Exclusion Criteria: 1. Dementia or significant confusion (Callahan 6-Item Cognitive Screening score = 3) 2. DSM-IV Axis I diagnosis (e.g. schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, or active substance use disorder) 3. Patients will not be excluded if they do not identify a caregiver 4. Uncorrectable hearing loss.

Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


Intervention

Behavioral:
Behavioral Support
ENABLE CHF-PC includes: In-person comprehensive Palliative Care Team (PCT) Consultation- as soon as feasible after enrollment. Palliative Care Nurse Coach (PNC) embedded within HF teams, instituting a phone-based 6-session patient and a 4-session caregiver curriculum followed by monthly phone-based supportive care for 48 weeks or patient death. The PNC uses the manualized curriculum: "Charting Your Course (CYC): An Intervention for Patients with Heart Failure and their Families". Usual Care: Usual heart failure care includes any available supportive care resources and heart failure patient medical management based on national HF guidelines.
Usual HF Care
Usual heart failure care includes any available supportive care resources and heart failure patient medical management based on national HF guidelines.

Locations

Country Name City State
United States Birmingham Veterans Affairs Medical Center (BVAMC) Birmingham Alabama
United States University of Alabama at Birmingham, School of Nursing, Dept. Acute, Chronic and Continuing Care Birmingham Alabama

Sponsors (2)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
University of Alabama at Birmingham US Department of Veterans Affairs

Country where clinical trial is conducted

United States, 

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary Patient Quality of Life as Measured on the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) Clinical Summary Score Baseline patient-reported Quality of Life (QOL) was measured on the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) Clinical Summary Score, a heart failure-specific 23-item instrument. The KCCQ consists of 4 clinical domains: symptoms - frequency & severity; Physical Limitation; Quality of Life and Social Limitation and captures the patient's perspective of heart failure. Clinical summary scores range from 0 to 100. Higher KCCQ scores indicate better perceived health status. KCCQ clinical summary scores greater than or equal to 50 indicate good QOL. Baseline
Primary Patient Quality of Life as Measured on the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) Clinical Summary Score Patient-reported Quality of Life (QOL) was measured on the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) at 16 weeks. The KCCQ consists of 4 clinical domains: symptoms - frequency & severity; Physical Limitation; Quality of Life and Social Limitation and captures the patient's perspective of heart failure. Clinical summary scores range from 0 to 100. Higher KCCQ scores indicate better perceived health status. KCCQ clinical summary scores greater than or equal to 50 indicate good QOL. 16 weeks
Primary Patient Quality of Life as Measured on the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Palliative Care Scale (FACIT-PAL-14) Baseline patient-reported Quality of Life (QOL) was measured on the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Palliative Care Scale (FACIT-PAL-14). Scores range from 0 to 56; higher scores indicate better quality of life. Baseline
Primary Patient Quality of Life as Measured on the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Palliative Care Scale (FACIT-PAL-14) Patient-reported Quality of Life (QOL) was measured on the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Palliative Care Scale (FACIT-PAL-14) at 16 weeks. Scores range from 0 to 56; higher scores indicate better quality of life. 16 weeks
Primary Patient & Caregiver Mood - Anxiety - as Measured on the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) Baseline patient & caregiver-reported mood - Anxiety - was measured on the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). 7 items measure anxiety symptoms.Scores range from 0 to 21; higher scores indicate more severe symptoms. Baseline
Primary Patient & Caregiver Mood - Anxiety - as Measured on the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) Change from baseline in patient & caregiver-reported mood - Anxiety was measured on the HADS. 7 items measure anxiety symptoms. Scores range from 0 to 21; higher scores indicate more severe symptoms. 16 weeks
Primary Patient & Caregiver Mood - Depression - as Measured on the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) Baseline patient and caregiver-reported depression was measured on the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). 7 items measure depression symptoms. Scores range from 0 to 21; higher scores indicate more severe symptoms. Baseline
Primary Patient & Caregiver Mood - Depression - as Measured on the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) Patient and caregiver-reported depression was measured on the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) at 16 weeks. 7 items measure depression symptoms. Scores range from 0 to 21; higher scores indicate more severe symptoms. 16 weeks
Primary Caregiver Quality of Life as Measured on the Bakas Caregiving Outcomes Scale (BCOS) Baseline caregiver-reported quality of life (QOL) was measured on the Bakas Caregiving Outcomes Scale (BCOS). Score range: 15-105; higher scores indicate higher quality of life. Baseline
Primary Caregiver Quality of Life as Measured on the Bakas Caregiving Outcomes Scale (BCOS) Caregiver-reported quality of life (QOL) was measured on the Bakas Caregiving Outcomes Scale (BCOS) at 16 weeks. Score range: 15-105; higher scores indicate higher quality of life. 16 weeks
Primary Caregiver Burden - Objective - as Measured on the Montgomery Borgatta Caregiver Burden Scale (MBCB) Baseline caregiver-reported Objective burden was measured on the Montgomery Borgatta Caregiver Burden Scale (MBCB). This subscale measures the object burden, interference with the caregiver's day-to-day activities given caregiving demands. Score range: 6-30, Greater than 23 indicates high burden. Baseline
Primary Caregiver Burden - Objective - as Measured on the Montgomery Borgatta Caregiver Burden Scale (MBCB) Caregiver-reported Objective burden was measured on the Montgomery Borgatta Caregiver Burden Scale (MBCB) at 16 weeks. This subscale measures the object burden, interference with the caregiver's day-to-day activities given caregiving demands.Score range: 6-30, Greater than 23 indicates high burden. 16 weeks
Primary Caregiver Burden - Demand - as Measured on the Montgomery Borgatta Caregiver Burden Scale (MBCB) Baseline caregiver-reported Demand burden was measured on the Montgomery Borgatta Caregiver Burden Scale (MBCB). This subscale measures the demand burden or the strain among caregivers from meeting the needs of the care recipient. Score range: 6-30, Greater than 23 indicates high burden. Baseline
Primary Caregiver Burden - Demand - as Measured on the Montgomery Borgatta Caregiver Burden Scale (MBCB) Caregiver-reported Demand burden was measured on the Montgomery Borgatta Caregiver Burden Scale (MBCB) at 16 weeks. This subscale measures the demand burden or the strain among caregivers from meeting the needs of the care recipient. Score range: 6-30, Greater than 23 indicates high burden. 16 weeks
Primary Caregiver Burden - Stress - as Measured on the Montgomery Borgatta Caregiver Burden Scale (MBCB) Baseline caregiver-reported Stress burden was measured on the Montgomery Borgatta Caregiver Burden Scale (MBCB). his subscale indicates the stress burden or emotional stress from the demands of caregiving. Score range: 6-30, Greater than 23 indicates high burden. Baseline
Primary Caregiver Burden - Stress- as Measured on the Montgomery Borgatta Caregiver Burden Scale (MBCB) Caregiver-reported Stress burden was measured on the Montgomery Borgatta Caregiver Burden Scale (MBCB) at 16 weeks. This subscale indicates the stress burden or emotional stress from the demands of caregiving. Score range: 6-30, Greater than 23 indicates high burden. 16 weeks
Secondary Patient and Caregiver PHYSICAL Health Status as Measured on the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Short Form Global Health-10 Baseline patient- and caregiver-reported PHYSICAL health status was measured on the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Short Form Global Health-10. The PROMIS SF Global Health-10 measures general domains of health including physical, mental, and social health, symptoms, overall quality of life. Summed scores for PROMIS measures are converted to T scores with a mean of 50 and standard deviation of 10 in the general US population; higher scores indicate better functioning. Baseline
Secondary Patient and Caregiver PHYSICAL Health Status as Measured on the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Short Form Global Health-10 Patient- and caregiver-reported PHYSICAL health status was measured on the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Short Form Global Health at 16 weeks. The PROMIS SF Global Health-10 measures general domains of health including physical, mental, and social health, symptoms, overall quality of life. Summed scores for PROMIS measures are converted to T scores with a mean of 50 and standard deviation of 10 in the general US population; higher scores indicate better functioning. 16 weeks
Secondary Patient and Caregiver MENTAL Health Status as Measured on the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Short Form Global Health-10 Baseline patient- and caregiver-reported MENTAL health status was measured on the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Short Form Global Health. The PROMIS SF Global Health-10 measures general domains of health including physical, mental, and social health, symptoms, overall quality of life. Summed scores for PROMIS measures are converted to T scores with a mean of 50 and standard deviation of 10 in the general US population; higher scores indicate better functioning. Baseline
Secondary Patient and Caregiver MENTAL Health Status as Measured on the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Short Form Global Health-10 Patient- and caregiver-reported MENTAL health status was measured on the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Short Form Global Health at 16 weeks. The PROMIS SF Global Health-10 measures general domains of health including physical, mental, and social health, symptoms, overall quality of life. Summed scores for PROMIS measures are converted to T scores with a mean of 50 and standard deviation of 10 in the general US population; higher scores indicate better functioning. 16 weeks
Secondary Patient Symptom Burden as Measured on the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) Symptom Items Baseline patient-reported symptom burden was measured on symptom-based items from the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ). Higher KCCQ scores indicate better perceived health status. The KCCQ Symptom burden domain consists of 8 items and quantifies the frequency, severity and change over time with clinical symptoms in heart failure, including fatigue, shortness of breath, paroxysmal nocturnal dyspnea and patients' edema/swelling. KCCQ symptom domain scores range from 0 to 100; A score of 50 is the threshold between unstable heart failure symptoms (<50) or stable heart failure symptoms (>=50). Baseline
Secondary Patient Symptom Burden Items as Measured on the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) Symptom Items. Patient-reported symptom burden was measured on symptom-based items from the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) at 16 weeks. Higher KCCQ scores indicate better perceived health status. The KCCQ Symptom burden domain consists of 8 items and quantifies the frequency, severity and change over time for clinical symptoms in heart failure, including fatigue, shortness of breath, paroxysmal nocturnal dyspnea and patients' edema/swelling. KCCQ symptom domain scores range from 0 to 100; A score of 50 is the threshold between unstable heart failure symptoms (<50) or stable heart failure symptoms (>=50). 16 weeks
Secondary Patient Pain Intensity as Measured on the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) 3-item Pain Intensity Scale Baseline patient-reported PAIN INTENSITY was measured on the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Pain Intensity Scale. Higher pain scores indicate more pain. Score range: 0-100; Scores greater than 50 indicate high pain. Baseline
Secondary Patient Pain Intensity as Measured on the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) 3-item Pain Intensity Scale Patient-reported PAIN INTENSITY was measured on the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Pain Intensity Scale at 16 weeks. Higher pain scores indicate more pain. Score range: 0-100; Scores greater than 50 indicate high pain. 16 weeks
Secondary Patient Pain Interference as Measured on the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) 2-item Pain Interference Scale Baseline patient-reported PAIN INTERFERENCE was measured on the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Pain Intensity Scale. Higher pain interference scores indicate more interference in daily life. Score range: 0-100; Scores greater than 50 indicate high pain. Baseline
Secondary Patient Pain Interference as Measured on the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) 2-item Pain Interference Scale Patient-reported PAIN INTERFERENCE was measured on the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Pain Intensity Scale at 16 weeks. Higher pain interference scores indicate more interference in daily life. Score range: 0-100; Scores greater than 50 indicate high pain. 16 weeks
Secondary Patient Resource Use - Days in Hospital - as Measured on the Investigator-developed Instrument Baseline patient-reported health care utilization - Number of Days in Hospital, last two months - was measured on the Resource Use Questionnaire. This measure is an investigator-developed instrument to capture number of Inpatient days, ICU days, ED visits, hospice use, palliative care provider visits, AD completion, and DNR orders. The possible range of Days in Hospital is 0 Days to 60 Days (last/previous two months prior to this measure). Baseline
Secondary Patient Resource Use - Days in Hospital - as Measured on the Investigator-developed Instrument Patient-reported health care utilization - Number of Days in Hospital, last two months - was measured on the Resource Use Questionnaire at 16 weeks. This measure is an investigator-developed instrument to capture number of Inpatient days, ICU days, ED visits, hospice use, palliative care provider visits, AD completion, and DNR orders. The possible range of Days in Hospital is 0 Days to 60 Days (last/previous two months prior to this measure). 16 weeks
Secondary Patient Resource Use - Emergency Department Visits - as Measured on the Investigator-developed Instrument Baseline patient-reported health care utilization - Number of Emergency Department Visits, last two months - was measured on the Resource Use Questionnaire. This measure is an investigator-developed instrument to capture number of Inpatient days, ICU days, ED visits, hospice use, palliative care provider visits, AD completion, and DNR orders. The possible range of Visits to ED is 0 Visits to 60 Visits (in the last/previous two months prior to this measure). Baseline
Secondary Patient Resource Use - Emergency Department Visits - as Measured on the Investigator-developed Instrument Patient-reported health care utilization - Number of Emergency Department Visits, last two months - was measured on the Resource Use Questionnaire at 16 weeks. This measure is an investigator-developed instrument to capture number of Inpatient days, ICU days, ED visits, hospice use, palliative care provider visits, AD completion, and DNR orders. The possible range of Visits to ED is 0 Visits to 60 Visits (in the last/previous two months prior to this measure). 16 weeks
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Recruiting NCT05654272 - Development of CIRC Technologies
Recruiting NCT05650307 - CV Imaging of Metabolic Interventions
Recruiting NCT05196659 - Collaborative Quality Improvement (C-QIP) Study N/A
Active, not recruiting NCT05896904 - Clinical Comparison of Patients With Transthyretin Cardiac Amyloidosis and Patients With Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction N/A
Completed NCT05077293 - Building Electronic Tools To Enhance and Reinforce Cardiovascular Recommendations - Heart Failure
Recruiting NCT05631275 - The Role of Bioimpedance Analysis in Patients With Chronic Heart Failure and Systolic Ventricular Dysfunction
Enrolling by invitation NCT05564572 - Randomized Implementation of Routine Patient-Reported Health Status Assessment Among Heart Failure Patients in Stanford Cardiology N/A
Enrolling by invitation NCT05009706 - Self-care in Older Frail Persons With Heart Failure Intervention N/A
Recruiting NCT04177199 - What is the Workload Burden Associated With Using the Triage HF+ Care Pathway?
Terminated NCT03615469 - Building Strength Through Rehabilitation for Heart Failure Patients (BISTRO-STUDY) N/A
Recruiting NCT06340048 - Epicardial Injection of hiPSC-CMs to Treat Severe Chronic Ischemic Heart Failure Phase 1/Phase 2
Recruiting NCT05679713 - Next-generation, Integrative, and Personalized Risk Assessment to Prevent Recurrent Heart Failure Events: the ORACLE Study
Completed NCT04254328 - The Effectiveness of Nintendo Wii Fit and Inspiratory Muscle Training in Older Patients With Heart Failure N/A
Completed NCT03549169 - Decision Making for the Management the Symptoms in Adults of Heart Failure N/A
Recruiting NCT05572814 - Transform: Teaching, Technology, and Teams N/A
Enrolling by invitation NCT05538611 - Effect Evaluation of Chain Quality Control Management on Patients With Heart Failure
Recruiting NCT04262830 - Cancer Therapy Effects on the Heart
Completed NCT06026683 - Conduction System Stimulation to Avoid Left Ventricle Dysfunction N/A
Withdrawn NCT03091998 - Subcu Administration of CD-NP in Heart Failure Patients With Left Ventricular Assist Device Support Phase 1
Recruiting NCT05564689 - Absolute Coronary Flow in Patients With Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction and Left Bundle Branch Block With Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy