Heart Failure Clinical Trial
Official title:
Effectiveness of a Multidisciplinary Care Management Program for High-risk Patients Who Are Admitted at Hospital Because of Heart Failure (PROMIC)
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness of a multidisciplinary care management
collaborative program for high-risk patients with heart failure (HF) who are admitted at
hospital, based on the 6 components of the Chronic Care Model "PROMIC", in terms of
reduction of a Combined event rate (readmissions / cardiac events / death / emergency
department visits) and other variables, the feasibility of the program, the improvement on
quality of life related to health and functional capacity of the PROMIC patients compared
with control patients in usual care.
DESIGN: A quasi-experimental, prospective one year follow-up study. SETTING AND SUBJECTS:
Primary Health care Centres of Interior County in Bizkaia and of Araba County in Araba,
Galdakao Hospital, Santa Marina Hospital and University hospital os Araba in the Basque
Country. Will be captured as a minimum intervention group of 125 patients admitted for HF in
New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional status II-III-IV from previous mentioned
hospitals. Another 125 patients from different primary health care centers, will be the
control group.
INTERVENTION: The intervention to be applied will be PROMIC, control patients will receive
usual care MEASUREMENTS: The mean outcome measure will be the time free of events from the
time of inclusion to the first event (readmission / cardiac events / death / emergency
visits). Secondary endpoints will be the quality of life related to health (MLFHQ and
SF-12), functional capacity (6-Minute Walk Test), structural changes in cardiac structure
(natriuretic peptide levels), adherence to drug treatment (Morinsky-Green), the cost of the
program, the usefulness and acceptability of PROMIC by professionals and patients. Predictor
variables also will be collected such as sex, age, education level, co-morbidity, social
risk level, dependency etc.
STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Analysis was performed by intention to treat. Survival curves will
done. A model of Cox proportional hazards will be built.
INTRODUCTION In light of the increased prevalence of chronic diseases and comorbidities as a
result of the increased life expectancy of the population, the need to develop care models
that adequately respond to the healthcare and sociodemographic needs of the populatión in
the actual context in which they are applied has been proposed. Patients with chronic and/or
multiple diseases present the greatest health care needs and tend to experience the
imbalances in the system with the greatest intensity. Investigators have concentrated the
research on patients admitted because of HF due to the high prevalence and complexity of
this disease and the fact that such patients present multiple chronic conditions. These
patients are normally elderly and present high degrees of comorbidity and poly-medication,
poor treatment adherence and difficulties in selfcare. The majority of patients admitted
with HF are in level 3 of the Kaiser pyramid together with other patients with complex
health care needs.
There is some evidence that a higher degree of multidisciplinarity results in better team
coordinatión and training and more effective care for complex high-risk patients, of which
HF patients are a good example.
PROMIC is an organisational care management innovation that provides a comprehensive and
integrated approach to patients with a high degree of complexity, in this case, patients
admitted with HF.
It promotes the integratión of care in different healthcare settings with the change of the
nurses role and self-care training in patients. As such, PROMIC helps to ensure the
continuity of patients care in their own environment.
The aim of the innovative care model that PROMIC is intended to provide in high-risk HF
patients is to improve health outcomes and to modify the current care model for chronic
diseases, thereby serving as the foundation for future interventions targetting other
chronic patients with multiple comorbidities and complex health care needs. Indeed,
precisely due to the presence of comorbidities in this type of patient, investigators
consider coordination with consultants from other specialities to be essential. As HF
patients present marked comorbidity, investigators expect that the experience acquired
during this project will help them to design interventions that can be broadened to cover
all complex chronic patients likely to benefit from a care management programs.
OBJECTIVES
- To evaluate the effectiveness of a multidisciplinary care management collaborative
program for high-risk patients with HF who are admitted at hospital, based on the 6
components of the Chronic Care Model "PROMIC", in terms of reduced Combined event rate
(readmissions / cardiac events / death / emergency department visits) and other
variables, the feasibility of the program, the improvement on quality of life related
to health and functional capacity of the PROMIC patients compared with control patients
in usual care.
- To understand the opinion of the professionals involved in the process using discussion
and consensus methods in order to design the most effective and comprehensive clinical
and organisational intervention.
The goal of this project is to establish a sustainable care model for patients admitted with
HF that improves their health outcomes. The understanding gained during implementation of
this model will lead to further research involving the care of other types of complex
chronic patients.
METHODOLOGY DESIGN: A quasi-experimental, prospective one year follow-up study. SETTING AND
SUBJECTS: Primary Health care Centres of Interior County in Bizkaia and of Araba County in
Araba, Galdakao Hospital, Santa Marina Hospital and University hospital os Araba in the
Basque Country. Will be captured as a minimum intervention group of 125 patients admitted
for HF in NYHA functional status II-III-IV from previous mentioned hospitals. Another 125
patients from different primary health care centers will be the control group.
INTERVENTION: The intervention to be applied will be PROMIC, control patients will receive
usual care.
PROMIC is an organizational innovation comprising a complex intervention containing
components supported by scientific evidence from both a content based on clinical practice
guidelines, (CPGs) as well as regarding its implementation, which is based on the Chronic
Care Model (CCM), developed by Ed Wagner at the McColl Institute (Seattle, USA) in the
1990s. As this is a complex intervention, investigators have selected the theoretical and
methodological framework for the design and evaluation of complex interventions in a
clinical setting developed by the healthcare and public health services working group of the
United Kingdom Medical Research Council (MRC), which comprises four phases.
In phase 0 investigators have undertaken a strategic needs research and evaluation process
and a comprehensive literature search regarding the management of HF patients and complex
chronic comorbid patients in order to identify and select areas for optimization. Phase 1
comprised the design of the intervention program in collaboratión with professionals from
the fields of primary care, hospital and social care, as well as primary researchers and
managers, and the piloting of the intervention with a small number of patients and taking
into account the actual context in the Basque country public health system where Primary
care is very well developed and effective and with a high quality hospital care. The
piloting of the intervention was deployed in 15 polymedicated (mean of 11 drugs) patients
admitted with HF and multiple comorbidities (mean of six chronic diseases) to confirm its
feasibility. This pilot study concluded with positive results and led to the implementation
of a quasi-experimental phase 2 trial.
Intervention (PROMIC) was performed in the framework of each of the six components of the
CCM.
1. Healthcare organisation. Investigators held 18 joint working sessions involving all
components of the multidisciplinary team to establish the content of the clinical care
and organisational interventions.
2. Delivery system design. A care management model describing the circuits and
communications between healthcare and non-healthcare professionals was defined in these
joint sessions.
3. Use of clinical information systems. Investigators use an electronic case history
shared by all professionals involved in patient care, which acts as a care record and
action reminder.
4. Decision-making support. Investigators have standardised the information contained in
the discharge planning report and the communications between professionals in the
return home and protocolized the pharmacological treatments indicated in the
guidelines. The individual problems presented by each patient are managed with a
comprehensive and personalized intervention.
Investigators have designed a theoretical/practical training plan for all study
participants 27 hours for physicians and 42 hours for nurses, which has been
complemented with a course on electrocardiography, basic recommendations for cardiology
and drug titration for nursing staff.
5. Education about self-care and empowerment of patients and their families. Creation of a
new nursing role aimed at coaching and educating patients and their families and
evaluating their level of understanding and self-care. Investigators have prepared
educational support material for personalized self-care aimed at patients and their
carers.
6. Integration of community resources. Investigators have established meetings and
contacts with social workers and community pharmacists.
MEASUREMENTS: The mean outcome measure will be the time free of events from the time of
inclusion to the first event (readmission / cardiac events / death / emergency visits).
Secondary endpoints will be the quality of life related to health (MLFHQ and SF-12),
functional capacity (6-Minute Walk Test), structural changes in cardiac structure (brain
natriuretic peptide BNP), adherence to drug treatment (Morinsky- Green questionaire), the
cost of the program based in the adjusted clinical group (ACG) , the usefulness and
acceptability of PROMIC by professionals and patients. Predictor variables also will be
collected such as sex, age, education level, co-morbidity, social risk level and dependency
baseline 6ºmonth 12º month
MLFHQ X X X
SF-12 X X X
6-Minute Walk Test X X X
BNP levels X X X
Morinsky-Green X X X
HFSBS X X X
Charlson Index X X X
Memory impairment Screen (MIS)X X X
HAD (<70years) X X X
Yesavage(>70years) X X X
Duke X X X
Lawton y Brody X X X
Barthel X X X
Zarit X X X
Social evaluation scale X X X
Professional focus group X
Cost X
Perception of integrated care D'Amour X
STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Analysis was performed by intention to treat. Survival curves will
done. A model of Cox proportional hazards will be built.
;
Allocation: Non-Randomized, Endpoint Classification: Efficacy Study, Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment, Masking: Open Label, Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
| Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Recruiting |
NCT05650307 -
CV Imaging of Metabolic Interventions
|
||
| Recruiting |
NCT05654272 -
Development of CIRC Technologies
|
||
| Recruiting |
NCT05196659 -
Collaborative Quality Improvement (C-QIP) Study
|
N/A | |
| Active, not recruiting |
NCT05896904 -
Clinical Comparison of Patients With Transthyretin Cardiac Amyloidosis and Patients With Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction
|
N/A | |
| Completed |
NCT05077293 -
Building Electronic Tools To Enhance and Reinforce Cardiovascular Recommendations - Heart Failure
|
||
| Recruiting |
NCT05631275 -
The Role of Bioimpedance Analysis in Patients With Chronic Heart Failure and Systolic Ventricular Dysfunction
|
||
| Enrolling by invitation |
NCT05564572 -
Randomized Implementation of Routine Patient-Reported Health Status Assessment Among Heart Failure Patients in Stanford Cardiology
|
N/A | |
| Enrolling by invitation |
NCT05009706 -
Self-care in Older Frail Persons With Heart Failure Intervention
|
N/A | |
| Recruiting |
NCT04177199 -
What is the Workload Burden Associated With Using the Triage HF+ Care Pathway?
|
||
| Terminated |
NCT03615469 -
Building Strength Through Rehabilitation for Heart Failure Patients (BISTRO-STUDY)
|
N/A | |
| Recruiting |
NCT06340048 -
Epicardial Injection of hiPSC-CMs to Treat Severe Chronic Ischemic Heart Failure
|
Phase 1/Phase 2 | |
| Recruiting |
NCT05679713 -
Next-generation, Integrative, and Personalized Risk Assessment to Prevent Recurrent Heart Failure Events: the ORACLE Study
|
||
| Completed |
NCT04254328 -
The Effectiveness of Nintendo Wii Fit and Inspiratory Muscle Training in Older Patients With Heart Failure
|
N/A | |
| Completed |
NCT03549169 -
Decision Making for the Management the Symptoms in Adults of Heart Failure
|
N/A | |
| Recruiting |
NCT05572814 -
Transform: Teaching, Technology, and Teams
|
N/A | |
| Enrolling by invitation |
NCT05538611 -
Effect Evaluation of Chain Quality Control Management on Patients With Heart Failure
|
||
| Recruiting |
NCT04262830 -
Cancer Therapy Effects on the Heart
|
||
| Completed |
NCT06026683 -
Conduction System Stimulation to Avoid Left Ventricle Dysfunction
|
N/A | |
| Withdrawn |
NCT03091998 -
Subcu Administration of CD-NP in Heart Failure Patients With Left Ventricular Assist Device Support
|
Phase 1 | |
| Recruiting |
NCT05564689 -
Absolute Coronary Flow in Patients With Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction and Left Bundle Branch Block With Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy
|