Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

NCT number NCT00763867
Other study ID # Pro00018007
Secondary ID U01HL084904U01HL
Status Completed
Phase Phase 3
First received September 30, 2008
Last updated July 14, 2014
Start date September 2008
Est. completion date September 2012

Study information

Verified date July 2013
Source Duke University
Contact n/a
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority United States: Federal Government
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

Diastolic heart failure (DHF), which affects older individuals and women at a disproportionate rate, is a condition that can lead to shortness of breath and fluid build-up in the lungs. This study will evaluate the effectiveness of the medication sildenafil at improving exercise ability and health outcomes in people with DHF.


Description:

DHF is a condition in which one of the chambers of the heart, the left ventricle, loses its ability to relax completely because the muscle has become too stiff. When this occurs, the heart is unable to properly fill with blood, which can lead to decreased blood circulation. People with DHF may experience shortness of breath and pulmonary congestion, which is an abnormal build-up of fluid in the lungs. Current treatment for DHF includes guidelines/recommendations to lower blood pressure, stop smoking, and lose weight, but there are no medications available to specifically treat DHF. Sildenafil, commonly known as Revatio or Viagra, is a medication that increases the supply of blood to the lungs and reduces the workload of the heart. Preliminary studies have shown that sildenafil may be beneficial at improving heart and lung function in people with DHF, but more research is needed to confirm these findings. The purpose of this study is to determine if sildenafil can improve exercise ability and health outcomes in people with DHF.

This 24-week study will enroll people with DHF. Participants will be randomly assigned to receive either sildenafil or placebo three times a day for 24 weeks. Participants will attend study visits at baseline and Weeks 1, 4, 12, 13, and 24. At most study visits, the following procedures will occur: physical exam, medical history review, questionnaires, blood collection, 6-minute walk test to measure endurance, and an exercise test. At baseline and Week 24, participants will also undergo an electrocardiogram, which will measure the electrical activity of the heart, and a cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) procedure and an echocardiogram, which will both obtain pictures of the heart. At Weeks 3, 8, 16, and 20, study researchers will call participants to collect health information.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Completed
Enrollment 216
Est. completion date September 2012
Est. primary completion date September 2012
Accepts healthy volunteers No
Gender Both
Age group 18 Years and older
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria:

- Previous clinical diagnosis of heart failure with current New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class II-IV symptoms

- Has experienced at least one of the following in the 12 months before study entry:

- Hospitalization for decompensated heart failure

- Acute treatment with intravenous loop diuretic or hemofiltration

- Mean pulmonary capillary wedge pressure greater than 15 mm Hg or left ventricular end diastolic pressure (LVEDP) greater than 18 mm Hg at catheterization for dyspnea

- Long term treatment with a loop diuretic and chronic diastolic dysfunction on echocardiography, as determined by left atrial enlargement

- Left ventricular ejection fraction greater than or equal to 50%, as determined by a clinical echocardiogram or ventriculogram in the 12 months before study entry

- Receiving stable medical therapy in the 30 days before study entry, as determined by no addition or removal of angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor (ACE), angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB), beta-blockers, or calcium channel blockers (CCB) and no change in dosage of ACE, ARBs, beta-blockers, or CCBs of more than 100%

Exclusion Criteria:

- Has a neuromuscular, orthopedic, or other non-cardiac condition that prevents individual from exercise testing on a bicycle ergometer or from walking in a hallway

- Non-cardiac condition that limits life expectancy to less than 1 year at the time of study entry, based on the judgment of the physician

- Current or anticipated future need for nitrate therapy

- Valve disease (i.e., greater than mild aortic or mitral stenosis; greater than moderate aortic or mitral regurgitation)

- Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy

- Infiltrative or inflammatory myocardial disease (e.g., amyloid, sarcoid)

- Pericardial disease

- Primary pulmonary arteriopathy

- Has experienced a heart attack or unstable angina, or has undergone percutaneous transluminal coronary angiography (PTCA) or coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) in the 60 days before study entry, or requires either PTCA or CABG at the time of study entry

- Other clinically important causes of dyspnea, such as morbid obesity or significant lung disease, as defined by clinical judgment or use of steroids or oxygen for lung disease

- Systolic blood pressure less than 110 mm Hg or greater than 180 mm Hg

- Diastolic blood pressure less than 40 mm Hg or greater than 100 mm Hg

- Resting heart rate (HR) greater than 100 bpm

- History of reduced ejection fraction (less than 50%)

- Implanted metallic device that will interfere with MRI examination (in people without atrial fibrillation)

- Severe kidney dysfunction (estimated glomerular filtration rate [GFR] less than 20 ml/min/1.73m2 by modified modification of diet in renal disease [MDRD] equation)

- Pregnant or not using an effective form of contraception

- Hemoglobin level of less than 10 g/dL

- Taking alpha antagonists or cytochrome P450 3A4 inhibitors (e.g., ketoconazole, itraconazole, erythromycin, saquinavir, cimetidine, or serum protease inhibitors for HIV)

- Retinitis pigmentosa, previous diagnosis of nonischemic optic neuropathy, untreated proliferative retinopathy, or unexplained visual disturbance

- Sickle cell anemia, multiple myeloma, leukemia, or penile deformities that increase the risk for priapism (e.g., angulation, cavernosal fibrosis, Peyronie's disease)

- Severe liver disease (aspartate aminotransferase [AST] level greater than three times the normal limit, alkaline phosphatase or bilirubin greater than two times the normal limit)

- In being consistent with American College of Cardiology (ACC)/American Heart Association (AHA) guidelines, people with dyspnea and risk factors for coronary artery disease should have had a stress test and those people with a clinically indicated stress test demonstrating significant ischemia in the 1 year before study entry will be excluded.

- Listed for heart transplantation

Study Design

Allocation: Randomized, Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment, Masking: Double Blind (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator), Primary Purpose: Treatment


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


Intervention

Drug:
Placebo

Sildenafil


Locations

Country Name City State
Canada Montreal Heart Institute Montreal Quebec
United States Morehouse School of Medicine Atlanta Georgia
United States Brigham and Women's Hospital Boston Massachusetts
United States University of Vermont - Fletcher Allen Health Care Burlington Vermont
United States Duke University Medical Center Durham North Carolina
United States Baylor College of Medicine Houston Texas
United States Minnesota Heart Failure Network Minneapolis Minnesota
United States University of Utah Health Sciences Center Murray Utah
United States Mayo Clinic Arizona Phoenix Arizona
United States Mayo Clinic Rochester Minnesota

Sponsors (3)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
Duke University National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI), Pfizer

Countries where clinical trial is conducted

United States,  Canada, 

References & Publications (1)

Redfield MM, Chen HH, Borlaug BA, Semigran MJ, Lee KL, Lewis G, LeWinter MM, Rouleau JL, Bull DA, Mann DL, Deswal A, Stevenson LW, Givertz MM, Ofili EO, O'Connor CM, Felker GM, Goldsmith SR, Bart BA, McNulty SE, Ibarra JC, Lin G, Oh JK, Patel MR, Kim RJ, — View Citation

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Other MRI Left Ventricular Mass A decrease in LV Mass is considered an improvement Change from Baseline to Week 24 No
Other MRI Left Ventricular Mass Index A decrease in Left Ventricular Mass Index is considered an improvement Change from Baseline to Week 24 No
Other MRI Left Ventricular End Diastolic Volume An increase in Left Ventricular End Diastolic Volume is considered an improvement Change from Baseline to Week 24 No
Other MRI Left Ventricular End Diastolic Volume Index An increase in Left Ventricular End Diastolic Volume Index is considered an improvement Change from Baseline to Week 24 No
Other MRI Left Ventricular End Systolic Volume Index An increase in Left Ventricular End Systolic Volume Index is considered an improvement Change from Baseline to Week 24 No
Other MRI Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) An increase in LVEF is considered an improvement Change from Baseline to Week 24 No
Other Echocardiogram Left Ventricular Mass A decrease in Left Ventricular Mass is considered an improvement Change from Baseline to Week 24 No
Other Medial Diastolic Elastance A decrease in Medial Diastolic Elastance is considered an improvement Change from Baseline to Week 24 No
Other Lateral Diastolic Elastance A decrease in Lateral Diastolic Elastance is considered an improvement Change from Baseline to Week 24 No
Other Medial Left Ventricular Relaxation An increase in Left Ventricular relaxation is considered to be an improvement Change from Baseline to Week 24 No
Other Lateral Left Ventricular Relaxation An increase in Left Ventricular relaxation is considered to be an improvement Change from Baseline to Week 24 No
Other Medial Filling Pressure A decrease in medial filling pressure is considered an improvement Change from Baseline to Week 24 No
Other Lateral Filling Pressure A decrease in lateral filling pressure is considered an improvement Change from Baseline to Week 24 No
Other ECHO Effective Arterial Elastance A decrease in Effective Arterial Elastance is considered an improvement Change from Baseline to Week 24 No
Other ECHO Systemic Vascular Resistance A decrease in Systemic Vascular Resistance is considered an improvement Change from Baseline to Week 24 No
Other MRI Effective Arterial Elastance A decrease in Effective Arterial Elastance is considered an improvement Change from Baseline to Week 24 No
Other MRI Systemic Vascular Resistance A decrease in Systemic Vascular Resistance is considered an improvement Change from Baseline to Week 24 No
Other MRI Aortic Thickness A decrease in Aortic Thickness is considered an improvement Change from Baseline to Week 24 No
Other MRI Aortic Distensibility An increase in Aortic Distensibility is considered to be an improvement Change from Baseline to Week 24 No
Other ECHO Pulmonary Artery Systolic Pressure A decrease in Pulmonary Artery Systolic Pressure is considered to be an improvement Change from Baseline to Week 24 No
Other Best Available Creatinine Best available=local lab results only when core lab results not available Change from Baseline to Week 24 No
Other Best Available Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) Best available=local lab results when core lab results not available Change from Baseline to Week 24 No
Other Cystatin C Change from Baseline to Week 24 No
Other Uric Acid Change from Baseline to Week 24 No
Other N-terminal Pro B-type Natriuretic Peptide (NT Pro-BNP) Change from Baseline to Week 24 No
Other Aldosterone Change from Baseline to Week 24 No
Other High Sensitivity Troponin I Change from Baseline to Week 24 No
Other Procollagen III N-terminal Peptide Change from Baseline to Week 24 No
Other Endothelin-1 Change from Baseline to Week 24 No
Other High Sensitivity C-Reactive Protein Change from Baseline to Week 24 No
Other Collagen Type I (CITP) Change from Baseline to Week 24 No
Other Cyclic Guanosine Monophosphate (cGMP) Change from Baseline to Week 24 No
Other Galectin 3 Change from Baseline to Week 24 No
Other Furosemide-Equivalent Dose Change from Baseline to Week 24 No
Primary Exercise Capacity, as Determined by Peak Oxygen Uptake Change from Baseline to Week 24 No
Secondary Exercise Capacity, as Determined by Peak Oxygen Uptake Change from Baseline to Week 12 No
Secondary Exercise Capacity as Determined by Walk Distance 6 Minute Walk Distance Change from Baseline to Week 12 No
Secondary Composite Score Reflective of Clinical Status Participants ranked sequentially with ranking stratified in one of three tiers based on:
Death (lowest tier) The person with the shortest time from randomization to death is given the lowest rank within the tier.
Hospitalizations due to cardiovascular or renal causes (middle tier) For patients alive, the ranking within this tier is based on time to hospitalization from randomization date. The person with the first cardiovascular or renal cause hospitalization will be given the lowest rank within the tier.
Change in Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire (MLWHFQ) from baseline (highest tier)
The use of three tiers within the ranking reflects the greater adverse impact of death or cardiovascular hospitalization on clinical status without an arbitrary assignment as to the relative value of these events in relation to changes in quality of life. Rank order: 1-189 (higher values are better)
Measured at Week 24 No
Secondary Exercise Capacity as Determined by Walk Distance 6 minute walk distance Change from Baseline to Week 24 No
Secondary Cardiopulmonary Exercise Test (CPET) Duration To interpret the CPET Exercise Duration change endpoints, an increase in exercise duration between Baseline and Week 12/Week 24 is considered to be an improvement Change from Baseline to Week 12 No
Secondary Cardiopulmonary Exercise Test (CPET) Duration To interpret the CPET Exercise Duration change endpoints, an increase in exercise duration between Baseline and Week 12/Week 24 is considered to be an improvement Change from Baseline to Week 24 No
Secondary Ventilatory Anaerobic Threshold To interpret the Ventilatory Anaerobic Threshold (VAT) change endpoints, an increase in VAT between Baseline and Week 12/Week 24 is considered to be an improvement Change from Baseline to Week 12 No
Secondary Ventilatory Anaerobic Threshold To interpret the Ventilatory Anaerobic Threshold (VAT) change endpoints, an increase in VAT between Baseline and Week 12/Week 24 is considered to be an improvement Change from Baseline to Week 24 No
Secondary Minnesota Living With Heart Failure Questionnaire (MLWHFQ) The MLWHFQ is a self-administered, disease-specific measure of health related quality of life (QOL) that assesses patients perceptions of the influence of heart failure on physical, socioeconomic and psychological aspects of life. Patients respond to 21 items using a six-point response scale (0-5). The total summary score can range from 0-105 with a lower score reflecting better heart failure related QOL. Two sub-scale scores reflect physical (8 items) and emotional (5 items) impairment.
Total score: 0 - 105 Physical subscore: 0 - 40 Emotional subscore: 0 - 25
Change from Baseline to Week 12 No
Secondary Minnesota Living With Heart Failure Questionnaire The MLWHFQ is a self-administered, disease-specific measure of health related quality of life (QOL) that assesses patients perceptions of the influence of heart failure on physical, socioeconomic and psychological aspects of life. Patients respond to 21 items using a six-point response scale (0-5). The total summary score can range from 0-105 with a lower score reflecting better heart failure related QOL. Two sub-scale scores reflect physical (8 items) and emotional (5 items) impairment. Change from Baseline to Week 24 No
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Recruiting NCT05654272 - Development of CIRC Technologies
Recruiting NCT05196659 - Collaborative Quality Improvement (C-QIP) Study N/A
Recruiting NCT05650307 - CV Imaging of Metabolic Interventions
Active, not recruiting NCT05896904 - Clinical Comparison of Patients With Transthyretin Cardiac Amyloidosis and Patients With Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction N/A
Completed NCT05077293 - Building Electronic Tools To Enhance and Reinforce Cardiovascular Recommendations - Heart Failure
Recruiting NCT05631275 - The Role of Bioimpedance Analysis in Patients With Chronic Heart Failure and Systolic Ventricular Dysfunction
Enrolling by invitation NCT05564572 - Randomized Implementation of Routine Patient-Reported Health Status Assessment Among Heart Failure Patients in Stanford Cardiology N/A
Enrolling by invitation NCT05009706 - Self-care in Older Frail Persons With Heart Failure Intervention N/A
Recruiting NCT04177199 - What is the Workload Burden Associated With Using the Triage HF+ Care Pathway?
Terminated NCT03615469 - Building Strength Through Rehabilitation for Heart Failure Patients (BISTRO-STUDY) N/A
Recruiting NCT06340048 - Epicardial Injection of hiPSC-CMs to Treat Severe Chronic Ischemic Heart Failure Phase 1/Phase 2
Recruiting NCT05679713 - Next-generation, Integrative, and Personalized Risk Assessment to Prevent Recurrent Heart Failure Events: the ORACLE Study
Completed NCT04254328 - The Effectiveness of Nintendo Wii Fit and Inspiratory Muscle Training in Older Patients With Heart Failure N/A
Completed NCT03549169 - Decision Making for the Management the Symptoms in Adults of Heart Failure N/A
Recruiting NCT05572814 - Transform: Teaching, Technology, and Teams N/A
Enrolling by invitation NCT05538611 - Effect Evaluation of Chain Quality Control Management on Patients With Heart Failure
Recruiting NCT04262830 - Cancer Therapy Effects on the Heart
Completed NCT06026683 - Conduction System Stimulation to Avoid Left Ventricle Dysfunction N/A
Withdrawn NCT03091998 - Subcu Administration of CD-NP in Heart Failure Patients With Left Ventricular Assist Device Support Phase 1
Recruiting NCT05564689 - Absolute Coronary Flow in Patients With Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction and Left Bundle Branch Block With Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy