View clinical trials related to Healthcare-Associated Pneumonia.
Filter by:The study compares a device that is used for the detection of bacteria and MDR pathogens from skin, soft tissue and nose with the gold-standard (microbiological lab). It is a novel use for this device because it has been used in samples from the lower-respiratory tract.
The goal of this clinical trial is to determine the safety (phase II), then efficacy (phase III) of baricitinib plus standard of care (SOC) as compared to SOC alone for the treatment of hospital-acquired pneumonia in patients with a pro-inflammatory profile.
The current study is an exploratory, phase IIa randomized clinical trial (RCT) aiming to evaluate if early presepsin increase coupled with early initiation of anakinra as an adjunct therapy to the standard-of-care treatment may improve outcomes of community-acquired pneumonia or hospital-acquired pneumonia.
The purpose of this study is to learn about the safety and effectiveness of Zavicefta once released into the markets in Korea. This study is to learn about Zavicefta in patients with difficult types of infections in the abdomen, urinary tract and pneumonia which could have come from hospitalizations. This study was required by the Ministry of Food and Drug Safety (MFDS) of Korea's regulations.
Ambroxol is a mucolytic containing an active N-desmethyl metabolite of bromhexine. It is approved by both the U.S. FDA and EMA to be marketed under several formulations including oral, nasal, oro-mucosal, rectal and intravenous formulations. One of ambroxol's authorized use is for the treatment of bronchopulmonary infections. In addition, it has been found over the decades to have other multi-pronged properties such as local anaesthesia, anti-inflammatory and anti-oxidant effects. It also stimulates surfactant production in Type II pneumocytes, thus preventing atelectasis in pneumonia. Ambroxol has demonstrated a wide safety profile and is an extensively studied drug in terms of safety with the commonest side effects being skin rashes, allergies, nausea, vomiting, abdominal pain and dyspepsia. Severe pneumonia is is defined by the American Thoracic Society (ATS) as pneumonia that requires ICU admission and specifically fulfils one of two major criteria, or three out of nine minor criteria as per recommended in the latest ATS guideline. This study aims to investigate the effects of using intravenous ambroxol as an adjunct therapy on the resolution of severe pneumonia. The improvements in modified Clinical Pulmonary Infection Score (CPIS) will be used as a surrogate for resolution of severe pneumonia. Modified CPIS is a clinical score of 0-12 based on 6 clinical features: volume and character of tracheal secretions, chest radiograph infiltrates, body temperature, leukocyte count, oxygenation index, and microbiology results. Traditionally, CPIS score has been used to facilitate the diagnosis of VAP where a cut-off point of >6 is used to denote possible pneumonia. Interestingly, Luna et al has found that serial improvements in CPIS score can be successfully used as a surrogate for pneumonia resolution with good correlation with eventual survivability. This study will also explore the effects of using ambroxol on other clinical outcomes of patients with severe pneumonia, including ICU mortality, duration of ICU stay, length of mechanical ventilation and incidence of reintubation within 48 hours. If this adjunct treatment is able to reduce duration of ICU stay and length of MV, it will not only directly impact the patients' short & long term outcomes but will also confer logistical benefits in terms of saving resources and reducing healthcare economic burden while optimizing ICU turnover rates.
The objective of this study is to assess the diagnostic performance of multiplex respiratory PCR (PCR-RM) compared to standard microbiological tests and its potential impact on the early adaptation of antibiotic treatment in intensive care patients with severe pneumonia.
Multicentric observational prospective cohort study in 15 (fifteen) hospitals representing all Brazilian regions. The main objective of this project is to evaluate the incidence of Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia (VAP) when using the current ANVISA criteria for VAP versus VAE criteria defined by the National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN). The diagnostic accuracy of the two criteria for identifying VAP will also be compared, characterizing other events associated with mechanical ventilation that are not VAP, when applicable. The study also aims to adjudicate ventilator-associated pneumonias reported to ANVISA using current epidemiological diagnostic criteria.
This observational study will enroll approximately 450 in patients. Patients treated with CAZ AVI for at least 1 dose at around 20 research centers in China will be enroll.
Hospital-Acquired Pneumonia (HAP) is a severe lung infection that develops while a patient is in hospital. We aim to design a trial to see if modern diagnostic investigations can safely improve outcomes for patients suspected of HAP. Currently, doctors use chest x-rays to make the diagnosis, but these are difficult to interpret and a third of patients suspected of HAP receive antibiotics inappropriately. Patients are concerned about misdiagnosis and a solution might be to replace the chest x-ray with a CT scan since these show the lungs in more detail. Once a diagnosis of HAP is made, doctors would like to identify the bacteria or viruses responsible. However, current tests are too slow to determine the initial treatment, so guidelines suggest we cover a range of possibilities with two extended spectrum antibiotics. Patients tell us they are concerned, because these antibiotics increase the risk of severe side effects and promote antibiotic resistance. The BIOFIRE® FILMARRAY® pneumonia panel (FAPP) is a new test that can identify the cause of HAP quickly. If we can determine the best way to use the FAPP, we can give antibiotics more effectively and slow the development of antimicrobial resistance. We will conduct a feasibility study to inform the design of a fully powered trial to discover whether using CT scans or the FAPP, or both together, helps improve antibiotic use and patient recovery whilst being cost effective. We will interview some participants and staff about how the trial is working so that we can improve the design. We will list the costs associated with HAP so we can design a cost effectiveness evaluation for the definitive trial. We will use patient samples to investigate immune and inflammation related processes to better understand why some people develop HAP and why some become particularly unwell.
Medical condition or disease under investigation: Oromaxillofacial surgery in head and neck cancer Purpose of research: Retrospective data analysis identifying hospital acquired pneumonia in patients who undergo temporary tracheostomy with oromaxillofacial surgery and free flap reconstruction Primary objective: Undertake an adequately powered, robustly designed observational cohort study that describes the rates of hospital acquired pneumonia in patients who undergo a tracheostomy and those that undergo overnight intubation during oromaxillofacial surgery for HNC. Secondary objective: To investigate whether smoking history, respiratory history (COPD, asthma) or size of tumour are associated with an increased risk of developing hospital acquired pneumonia. Number of Subjects/Patients: 193 Study Type: Observational cohort Main Inclusion Criteria: Patients who underwent oromaxillofacial resection with free flap reconstruction and tracheostomy from 1st January 2018 to 31st December 2018. Patients who underwent oromaxillofacial resection with free flap reconstruction and with overnight intubation from 1st January 2014 to 31st December 2014 Statistical Methodology and Analysis: A power calculation has been used to determine the sample size required for statistical analysis of data. Statistical significance for rates of HAP will be tested between the two groups.