View clinical trials related to Healthcare-Associated Pneumonia.
Filter by:The primary aim of this single-center, prospective, randomized, controlled, study is to test the hypothesis that inhalation of NO 200 ppm prevents the development of nosocomial pneumonia in patients at risk after cardiac surgery under CPB. The study is interventional. Examination and treatment of patients is carried out in accordance with the approved standards of medical care for the relevant diseases. During the study, no experimental or unregistered (not approved for use) medical or diagnostic procedures in the territory of the Russian Federation will be carried out. The study includes patients admitted to the Cardiac Surgery Department of Cardiology Research Institute of Tomsk National Research Medical Center for elective surgery with CPB.
This is a multicenter, prospective randomized controlled trial. At least 2 but no more than 5 centers are expected to participate in the study. The primary objective is to test the hypothesis that the addition of high-dose inhaled nitric oxide therapy to standard treatment has a positive effect on the clinical course of pneumonia and the structure and function of cardiopulmonary system. Number of participants: 200, including the subproject NO-PNEUMONIA-CAP - 100 CAP participants, the subproject NO-PNEUMONIA-NP - 100 NP participants. Number of groups: 4 Inhalation of iNO at a dose of 200 ppm for 30 minutes under the control of methemoglobin level (no more than 5%) three times a day if the patient is allocated to the main group. The general course of iNO therapy will last until the pneumonia resolves, but no more than 7 days. Recording of vital signs and safety assessment will be carried out immediately before the initiation of NO therapy and every 15 minutes after its start (pulse, blood pressure, respiratory rate, SpO2, temperature, MetHb level).
Almost 90 out of 100 people carry herpes simplex viruses (HSV). Once a person has been infected with the herpes viruses, he or she can't get rid of them for the rest of her/his life. For the most part, the viruses are in a dormant state. Only when the immune system is weakened, for example in the case of a serious illness or stress, are the viruses reactivated. They then mainly cause cold sores, which are harmless for healthy people and usually heal without therapy. However, especially in people with a weakened immune system, HSV can also cause serious infections, such as meningitis. In almost every second mechanically ventilated patient in intensive care who has pneumonia, HSV can be detected in the respiratory tract. This is caused by reactivation of the viruses as a result of the severe underlying disease and stress during intensive care therapy. Whether treatment of the herpes viruses (e.g. with acyclovir) is necessary in this situation and helps the patients to cure has not been clarified, especially as acyclovir can also cause side effects such as a deterioration in kidney function. Currently, the physicians decide to treat the herpes viruses in about half of the patients. Several studies have shown that patients for whom the physician decided to treat the viruses survived more often. However, all of these studies looked at the course of the disease only retrospectively and thus are subject to many biases (including physician selection of who receives treatment, missing data). A definitive conclusion as to whether herpesvirus therapy can be recommended cannot be drawn without doubt from these studies. Therefore, the investigators would like to investigate in a randomized controlled trial, i.e. patients are randomly assigned to the experimental (therapy of herpesviruses) or control group (no therapy of herpesviruses), the effect of therapy with acyclovir on survival in mechanically ventilated intensive care patients with lower respiratory tract infection (pneumonia) in whom a large amount of HSV was found in the respiratory tract. The goal of the study is to provide clarity on whether therapy will help patients recover.
The goal of this clinical trial is to propose a seamless intervention linking rapid bacterial isolate identification and antibiotic resistance gene detection and targeted antibiotic prescription to minimise time between infection onset and appropriate treatment in patients with Pseudomonas aeruginosa or carbapenemase producing Enterobacterales infections. This is an investigator initiated trial. The primary hypothesis is that these interventions will lead to improved clinical outcomes amongst patients with hospital-acquired bloodstream infection, hospital-acquired pneumonia or ventilator-associated pneumonia due to carbapenem non-susceptible Pseudomonas aeruginosa or Enterobacterales, compared to standard antibiotic susceptibility testing. Patients will be randomised to either a control or intervention arm. Patients randomised to the intervention arm will have relevant specimens analysed by rapid microbiological diagnostics and will have early availability of ceftazidime-avibactam if appropriate. Patients randomised to the control arm, will have samples analysed by clinical microbiology laboratories using standard of care diagnostics. Antibiotics will be available to these patients as per usual institutional practice.
The purpose of this study is to learn about the safety and effectiveness of Zavicefta once released into the markets in Korea. This study is to learn about Zavicefta in patients with difficult types of infections in the abdomen, urinary tract and pneumonia which could have come from hospitalizations. This study was required by the Ministry of Food and Drug Safety (MFDS) of Korea's regulations.
Multicentric observational prospective cohort study in 15 (fifteen) hospitals representing all Brazilian regions. The main objective of this project is to evaluate the incidence of Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia (VAP) when using the current ANVISA criteria for VAP versus VAE criteria defined by the National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN). The diagnostic accuracy of the two criteria for identifying VAP will also be compared, characterizing other events associated with mechanical ventilation that are not VAP, when applicable. The study also aims to adjudicate ventilator-associated pneumonias reported to ANVISA using current epidemiological diagnostic criteria.
This observational study will enroll approximately 450 in patients. Patients treated with CAZ AVI for at least 1 dose at around 20 research centers in China will be enroll.
Hospital-Acquired Pneumonia (HAP) is a severe lung infection that develops while a patient is in hospital. We aim to design a trial to see if modern diagnostic investigations can safely improve outcomes for patients suspected of HAP. Currently, doctors use chest x-rays to make the diagnosis, but these are difficult to interpret and a third of patients suspected of HAP receive antibiotics inappropriately. Patients are concerned about misdiagnosis and a solution might be to replace the chest x-ray with a CT scan since these show the lungs in more detail. Once a diagnosis of HAP is made, doctors would like to identify the bacteria or viruses responsible. However, current tests are too slow to determine the initial treatment, so guidelines suggest we cover a range of possibilities with two extended spectrum antibiotics. Patients tell us they are concerned, because these antibiotics increase the risk of severe side effects and promote antibiotic resistance. The BIOFIRE® FILMARRAY® pneumonia panel (FAPP) is a new test that can identify the cause of HAP quickly. If we can determine the best way to use the FAPP, we can give antibiotics more effectively and slow the development of antimicrobial resistance. We will conduct a feasibility study to inform the design of a fully powered trial to discover whether using CT scans or the FAPP, or both together, helps improve antibiotic use and patient recovery whilst being cost effective. We will interview some participants and staff about how the trial is working so that we can improve the design. We will list the costs associated with HAP so we can design a cost effectiveness evaluation for the definitive trial. We will use patient samples to investigate immune and inflammation related processes to better understand why some people develop HAP and why some become particularly unwell.
RESPIRE is a randomized, unblinded, controlled study to measure the impact of a strategy based on a PCR test on the adjustment of antimicrobial therapy in immunocompromised patients suspected with ventilator-associated or hospital-acquired pneumonia (VAP/HAP) requiring mechanical ventilation (MV) in Intensive Care Unit (ICU). The gold-standard microbiological diagnostic method for pneumonia in the ICU is based on culture identification and antimicrobial susceptibility testing. Results are obtained in several days after the initiation of empiric antimicrobial therapy, exposing patients to a potential inappropriate broad-spectrum antimicrobial treatment. We aim to measure the impact of a PCR-based strategy to improve the percentage of patients with VAP or HAP receiving targeted antimicrobial therapy 24 hours after diagnosis compared to standard care
The use of corticosteroids in patients with severe community pneumonia, bacterial infection which kills lots of patients around the world, reduces the mortality of this infection. However, there are no studies with this type of drug regarding hospital-acquired pneumonia. This will be the first multicenter randomized trial to test hydrocortisone plus standard therapy in critical care patients with nosocomial pneumonia. This intervention is inexpensive and may improve the outcome of those patients, besides having an acceptable side effects profile.