View clinical trials related to Healthcare-Associated Pneumonia.
Filter by:The primary aim of this single-center, prospective, randomized, controlled, pilot study is to test the hypothesis that inhalation of NO 200 ppm prevents the development of nosocomial pneumonia in patients at risk after cardiac surgery with CPB. The study is interventional. Examination and treatment of patients is carried out in accordance with the approved standards of medical care for the relevant diseases. During the study, no experimental or unregistered (not approved for use) medical or diagnostic procedures in the territory of the Russian Federation will be carried out. The study includes patients admitted to the Cardiac Surgery Department of Cardiology Research Institute of Tomsk National Research Medical Center for elective surgery with CPB.
The study compares a device that is used for the detection of bacteria and MDR pathogens from skin, soft tissue and nose with the gold-standard (microbiological lab). It is a novel use for this device because it has been used in samples from the lower-respiratory tract.
Ambroxol is a mucolytic containing an active N-desmethyl metabolite of bromhexine. It is approved by both the U.S. FDA and EMA to be marketed under several formulations including oral, nasal, oro-mucosal, rectal and intravenous formulations. One of ambroxol's authorized use is for the treatment of bronchopulmonary infections. In addition, it has been found over the decades to have other multi-pronged properties such as local anaesthesia, anti-inflammatory and anti-oxidant effects. It also stimulates surfactant production in Type II pneumocytes, thus preventing atelectasis in pneumonia. Ambroxol has demonstrated a wide safety profile and is an extensively studied drug in terms of safety with the commonest side effects being skin rashes, allergies, nausea, vomiting, abdominal pain and dyspepsia. Severe pneumonia is is defined by the American Thoracic Society (ATS) as pneumonia that requires ICU admission and specifically fulfils one of two major criteria, or three out of nine minor criteria as per recommended in the latest ATS guideline. This study aims to investigate the effects of using intravenous ambroxol as an adjunct therapy on the resolution of severe pneumonia. The improvements in modified Clinical Pulmonary Infection Score (CPIS) will be used as a surrogate for resolution of severe pneumonia. Modified CPIS is a clinical score of 0-12 based on 6 clinical features: volume and character of tracheal secretions, chest radiograph infiltrates, body temperature, leukocyte count, oxygenation index, and microbiology results. Traditionally, CPIS score has been used to facilitate the diagnosis of VAP where a cut-off point of >6 is used to denote possible pneumonia. Interestingly, Luna et al has found that serial improvements in CPIS score can be successfully used as a surrogate for pneumonia resolution with good correlation with eventual survivability. This study will also explore the effects of using ambroxol on other clinical outcomes of patients with severe pneumonia, including ICU mortality, duration of ICU stay, length of mechanical ventilation and incidence of reintubation within 48 hours. If this adjunct treatment is able to reduce duration of ICU stay and length of MV, it will not only directly impact the patients' short & long term outcomes but will also confer logistical benefits in terms of saving resources and reducing healthcare economic burden while optimizing ICU turnover rates.
The objective of this study is to assess the diagnostic performance of multiplex respiratory PCR (PCR-RM) compared to standard microbiological tests and its potential impact on the early adaptation of antibiotic treatment in intensive care patients with severe pneumonia.
Hospital Acquired and Ventilator Associated Pneumonia (HAP/VAP) pose a significant burden to patients admitted to the Intensive Care Unit (ICU). Reported incidence ranges from 10-16% in all ICU patients (including HAP and VAP) and around 20-30% in ventilated patients (VAP). Patients with HAP/VAP have a high mortality rate. The estimated attributable mortality of VAP is 6-13%. Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs) are the gold standard for evaluating medical interventions, but are difficult to perform in this population. Several preventive and therapeutic treatment options are being developed that will require evaluation in phase-III trials. These trials are challenging due to the relatively low incidence of the outcome (e.g. HAP/VAP) or of the domain under study (e.g. specific antibiotic resistant infections) and the requirement of informed consent in critically ill patients. There is a need for a well-organized and well-trained international RCT network that enables efficient execution of a series of RCTs in this population. The aim of the current study is to set up an infrastructure to prospectively enroll patients at risk of HAP/VAP in ICUs in several European countries. Site personnel will be trained to obtain a GCP (Good Clinical Practice) certification (if not already done), to timely identify and enroll patients at risk of HAP/VAP, to timely identify occurrence of HAP/VAP, collect informed consent forms, collect source data, enter data into a clinical database, and use a dedicated system to reply to queries. Site sample collection, processing, identifying the causative organism, and antibiotic susceptibility testing will be validated and adapted if required where possible. Where site infrastructure and regulations allow, the possibility of automated data collection of included participants will be explored to ensure sustainability of the future platform. Furthermore, collected data will be used to inform future diagnostic, preventive and therapeutic trials. E.g. they may support assumptions in sample size calculations and expected number of enrolled participants, they may help in prioritizing interventions, or they may be used in simulations of adaptive trials to optimize decision rules.
Hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP) is one of the most frequent complications and the main cause of antibiotics use in hospitalized patients, particularly in intensive care units (ICUs). The latest European and French recommendations for the management of HAP were published in 2017 and 2018. Gram-negative bacilli are frequently identified in this pneumonia. The experts discussed the issue of tailored-empiric antimicrobial therapy. Because delayed antimicrobial therapy is associated with poor outcomes, their conclusion was to reduce the time to deliver proper antimicrobial therapy, but to limit over-use of broad-spectrum molecules. Since delays in microbiological identification hinder the ability of clinicians to streamline therapy, rapid diagnostic with multiplex PCR, which decreases the time to organism identification by 2 days compared to conventional methods, is appealing, especially for gram-negative bacilli. The FilmArray® Lower Respiratory Tract Infection Panel is a rapid multiplex PCR which tests for the most frequently pathogens (18 bacteria including plenty of gram-negative bacilli +5 genes of resistance, and 9 viruses) involved in HAP. The FilmArray® Lower Respiratory Tract Infection (LRTI) Panel has a sensitivity and a specificity of 95% and 99% respectively and can be implemented in a personalized antimicrobial guidance to treat HAP due to gram-negative bacilli. The investigators hypothesized that a rapid multiplex PCR for guidance of empiric antimicrobial therapy, especially for gram-negative bacilli, reduces the time-to-proper antimicrobial therapy and reduces the risk of death of patients suffering of HAP. The investigators aim to assess the efficacy of an antimicrobial stewardship including the results of a rapid respiratory panel multiplex PCR for empiric antimicrobial guidance in patients with hospital-acquired pneumonia due to gram-negative bacilli. The investigators will use a before-after design to test the efficiency of an antimicrobial stewardship including a highly innovative intervention.
The purpose of this study is to determine the effectiveness of a universal, standardized oral care protocol on prevention of non-ventilated hospital-acquired pneumonia (NV-HAP) in the acute care setting. In the course of the year-long study, the research team will provide educational and materials support for oral hygiene on two interventional units (one medical; one surgical) and two control units (one matched medical; one surgical). At the end of the study, the research team will evaluate existing hospital data to determine the number of NV-HAPs in the interventional and control groups.
This is an open-label, randomized, multi-center, interventional, active-controlled Phase 4 study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of CAZ-AVI versus BAT in the treatment of infected participants with selected infection types (Hospital Acquired Pneumonia [HAP] (including Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia [VAP]); Complicated Urinary-Tract Infection [cUTI]; Complicated Intra-Abdominal Infection [cIAI]; Bloodstream Infection [BSI]) due to carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative pathogens in China.This study will be an estimation study. The statistical inference will be based on point estimate and confidence interval.
There is no clear consensus on the use of pneumonia severity index (PSI) developed for community-acquired pneumonia in hospital-acquired pneumonia cases. In another aspect, PSI is a relatively difficult scoring system that includes many parameters. This study evaluated whether lactate clearance could be used as a mortality marker instead of PSI in hospital-acquired pneumonia. As a result, lactate clearance was lower in the mortal group and when the diagnostic statistics were evaluated, it was seen that the sensitivity and specificity rates were significantly higher. In conclusion, lactate clearance has been evaluated as a strong predictor of mortality in hospital-acquired pneumonia.
This is a prospective, single arm, open-label, multi-center clinical study evaluating the effectiveness and safety of CAZ-AVI in participants with HAP (including VAP), who have initiated treatment with CAZ-AVI in an inpatient hospital setting. The duration of antibiotic treatment with the CAZ-AVI is 7-14 days. Participants must receive intravenously (IV) CAZ-AVI in the hospital for at least 7 full days. There are no formal hypothesis tests planned for this study. The number and percent of participants having clinical cure, failure, and indeterminate at TOC visit in the cMITT analysis population will be summarized.