View clinical trials related to Glaucoma.
Filter by:A prospective, multicenter, randomized, single-masked, post-market clinical trial comparing cataract surgery in conjunction with ab-interno canaloplasty utilizing the iTrack Advance canaloplasty device (Nova Eye, Inc.) to cataract surgery only in patients with mild to moderate, primary open angle glaucoma. Subjects will be followed for 12 months.
The objective of this early feasibility clinical study is to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the GORE Glaucoma Drainage Implant (2 configurations) in subjects with primary open-angle glaucoma that is uncontrolled by hypotensive medications or for which conventional incisional glaucoma surgery would be more likely to fail due to scarring.
Intraocular tamponade used in vitrectomy operations may affects retinal function in various mechanisms.
We are testing the accuracy of Reichert's Tono-Vera tonometer by comparing measurements of IOP with this device and measurements with other commonly-used tonometers, including Goldmann Applanation and iCare.
To evaluate safety and the ocular hypotensive effect of STN1012600 ophthalmic solution 0.002% alone or in combination with Timolol ophthalmic solution 0.5% for 52 weeks in subjects with open angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension.
Rationale: Glaucoma is a group of diseases characterized by progressive neuropathy of the optic nerve associated with visual field loss. Current glaucoma management aims to preserve visual function throughout life by reducing the intraocular pressure. This can be achieved by medical therapy or by surgical procedures such as implantation of a glaucoma drainage device (GDD). Conventionally, the tube of such a device is positioned in the anterior chamber (AC). Unfortunately, the presence of the tube in the AC may have a significant negative impact on the number of endothelial cells of the cornea and may even lead to corneal decompensation. Alternatively, the tube can be positioned in the posterior chamber (i.e. behind the iris). In this study, both procedures will be compared. Objective: Primary: to determine the loss of corneal endothelial cells after implantation of a Paul GDD with its tube either anterior or posterior of the iris. Secondary: to compare efficacy and safety of both procedures. Study design: Prospective, randomised, treatment controlled clinical trial. Study population: Pseudophakic patients with glaucoma who need a GDD. Intervention: Implantation of a Paul GDD with its tube anterior/posterior of the iris. Main study parameters/endpoints: Endothelial cell loss of the cornea. Nature and extent of the burden and risks associated with participation, benefit and group relatedness: At present potential benefits and drawbacks of positioning the Paul tube behind the iris are insufficiently known, successful positioning of the tube may require slightly more surgery time and the risk of hyphaema may be higher. It is expected, that in the long run damage to the corneal endothelium is less. Risks of study-related assessments are negligible, burden is low, extra time is about 35+15+35+35 minutes (total 2h).
Highlights the high-frequency deep sclerotomy (HFDS) as a promising ab-interno surgery in primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) patients and evaluates the efficacy and safety of the procedure.
The incidence of glaucoma is currently growing in the world's population, including the younger ones. However, the number of specialists who could perform examinations is unavailable in many areas of the Czech Republic outside large agglomerations. There is suitable alternative procedure that would make it possible to increase the intensity of screening, for example in general practitioners surgeries via application of teleophthalmology. Early detection is absolutely essential for the patient (and therefore the health care system) for his/her further successful treatment. At the same time, all the necessary technical prerequisites are well known and commercially available.
Multicentric evaluation of best corrected visual acuity of the XEN implant versus classic trabeculectomy in open angle glaucoma subjects
laucoma having bad prognosis after maximally tolerated medication,glaucoma that fails after filtering operations, neovascular glaucoma, glaucoma following vitrectomy and glaucoma secondary to uveitis etc. is collectively termed as refractory glaucoma. For such glaucoma patients, cyclodestructive procedures are often used to reduce IOP, as well as to relieve ocular and periocular pain. Recently,diode laser transscleral cyclophotocoagulation has proved to be an effective method for the treatment of refractory glaucoma and it has become a standard treatment for refractory glaucoma.(Yu, Q., Liang, Y., Ji, F. and Yuan, Z.,et al 2020. ) In previous articles, little is known about the long-term outcomes of micropulse diode laser cyclophotocoagulation and cyclocryotherapy. Discrepancies in the results of several large observational analyses have introduced further ambiguity on the role of micropulse diode laser cyclophotocoagulation and cyclocryotherapy.The mechanism of transcleral cyclophotocoagulation IOP lowering in refractory glaucoma is not well understood. In this study, we perform cyclocryoablation and micropulse diode laser cyclophotocoagulation in patients with refractory glaucoma and report the outcomes / mechanism of IOP control using this new surgical paradigm. The objective of our project is to assess the end result and outcome of the role of micropulse diode laser cyclophotocoagulation and cyclocryotherapy.We aim to evaluate the comparison between micropulse diode laser cyclophotocoagulation and cyclocryotherapy. Only those subjects will be recruited who provide written informed consent. Patients are diagnosed on bases of tonometry, gonioscopy, ophthalmoscopy, perimetry. Patients' age, gender, type of glaucoma, number of diode laser treatment sessions, postoperative complications, number of hypotensive medications required to control IOP, and best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) will be evaluated. The criteria for success will be defined as postoperative IOP <21 mmHg or >20% decrease in IOP with or without additional medical treatment.