Clinical Trial Details
— Status: Recruiting
Administrative data
NCT number |
NCT05019508 |
Other study ID # |
210175 |
Secondary ID |
|
Status |
Recruiting |
Phase |
|
First received |
|
Last updated |
|
Start date |
August 13, 2021 |
Est. completion date |
July 31, 2023 |
Study information
Verified date |
August 2021 |
Source |
University of Virginia |
Contact |
Frederick W Loehr, MD |
Phone |
8043804798 |
Email |
fwl4f[@]hscmail.mcc.virginia.edu |
Is FDA regulated |
No |
Health authority |
|
Study type |
Observational
|
Clinical Trial Summary
This is a prospective cohort study to assess the predictive value of fetal cardiac
parameters, the change in fetal cardiac parameters (CFP), HbA1c, and/or the change in HbA1c
(ΔHbA1c) for gestational diabetes.
Description:
Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is the onset of carbohydrate intolerance that affects up
to 6-9% of pregnancies. A diagnosis of GDM conveys numerous implications for the health of
the mother and the fetus if not properly identified and/or treated. Maternal complications
include increased risk of preeclampsia and development of Type 2 diabetes mellitus later in
life. The risks to the fetus include increased risk of macrosomia, stillbirth, hypoglycemia,
shoulder dystocia as well as increased risk of childhood obesity and diabetes.
Per ACOG guidelines, women who are at an increased risk for undiagnosed pre-gestational
diabetes mellitus or developing GDM should receive early screening when they initially
present for prenatal care, most commonly in the late first or early second trimester.5 The
best test for this early assessment is not yet established. Practices patterns vary between
use of the two-step oral glucose tolerance screening and glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c). Use of
the oral glucose tolerance tests for screening of GDM is well-established and the cut-offs
determined for 24-28 week routine screening are used when the oral tolerance tests are
administered in early pregnancy. An HbA1c level ≥6.5% is used to diagnose diabetes, however
there is evidence that there is a higher rate of GDM diagnosis and poor outcomes with a HbA1c
level as low as 5.6%. Women who are not diagnosed with GDM before 20 weeks, go on to routine
screening at 24-28 weeks.
With the current protocols for early GDM screening, treatment of early glucose intolerance
has not shown to improve neonatal outcomes, however. The methods and timing of current early
GDM screening may not be identifying a population that is truly at risk of poor outcomes from
glucose intolerance in the way routine screening with the two-step process does. More
research into screening paradigms other than oral tolerance tests in early pregnancy is
needed. A HbA1c level assesses the amount glycation of hemoglobin molecules in red blood
cells, indirectly estimating the average blood glucose level over the past 8-12 weeks. HbA1c
independently has not been shown to be adequately predictive of a GDM diagnosis in pregnancy.
Many studies assessing the screening value of HbA1c obtain the value in the first trimester
when a large portion of the 12 weeks prior is before significant placentation. A change in
HbA1c in the first half of pregnancy, when combined with other clinical variables may be more
predictive. Novel clinical variables should also be considered. There is evidence that even
well-control pre-gestational and gestational diabetics show significant variation in fetal
cardiac functional parameters such as interventricular septum thickness (IVS), the E/A ratio,
and myocardial performance index (MPI). The predictive value of these changes for glucose
intolerance has not yet been investigated.
This is be a prospective cohort study to assess the predictive value of fetal cardiac
parameters, the change in fetal cardiac parameters (CFP), HbA1c, and/or the change in HbA1c
(ΔHbA1c) for gestational diabetes.