View clinical trials related to Generalized Anxiety Disorder.
Filter by:Currently, our best psychological treatments for anxiety and mood disorders only focus on individual diagnoses. So, there are separate treatments for Panic Disorder, or Depressive Disorder, or Social Anxiety, etc. These 'diagnosis-specific' treatments work well for people whose problems fit neatly into a single diagnosis. However, they work far less well for people with complex problems involving multiple diagnoses, and 50% of patients fail to respond well to these existing treatments. The purpose of this study is to test a new psychological treatment for anxiety and mood problems (the Modular Protocol for Mental Health [MPMH]). Instead of focusing on any single diagnosis, MPMH combines the best treatment techniques into 10 modules to target problems common across all of the different mood and anxiety diagnoses (e.g., intense emotions, negative thinking, upsetting memories, distressing habits). MPMH should therefore be a better treatment for the large numbers of individuals whose problems do not fit neatly into a single diagnosis and for whom any treatments targeting a single diagnosis would leave significant difficulties unaddressed.
The investigators will complete a pragmatic randomized trial (N=260 randomized participants) of the 26-week blended collaborative care (CC) intervention compared to enhanced usual care (eUC) in patients admitted for acute coronary syndrome (ACS) or heart failure (HF) found to have current depression, generalized anxiety disorder (GAD), or panic disorder (PD). The CC intervention will use a novel three-pronged approach to these high-risk patients. Care managers will provide centralized care coordination and specific interventions targeting: (1) the psychiatric disorders, (2) cardiac health behaviors, and (3) the cardiac illness. The primary study outcome will be physical function at 26 weeks, measured by the Duke Activity Status Index (DASI), given links between function and new cardiac events. The investigators will also examine effects on numerous other outcomes important to patients and healthcare systems. Specific Aim 1 [patient-centered outcomes-primary aim]: To compare between-group differences in the CC and eUC conditions on improvements in physical function, health-related quality of life, mental health, patient satisfaction, and other key patient-reported outcomes at 26 and 52 weeks. Specific Aim 2 [adherence and medical outcomes]: To compare between-group differences on health behaviors (physical activity, diet, smoking, medication adherence) and major adverse cardiac events. Specific Aim 3 [cost]: To compare healthcare costs between groups and assess the cost-effectiveness of CC. Hypotheses: The investigators expect this bolstered CC program to be associated with superior improvements in physical function, health-related quality of life, patient satisfaction, and adherence at 26 weeks, with promising effects on major adverse cardiac events. The investigators likewise expect the intervention to be cost-effective (<$10,000/quality-adjusted life year) over the study period.
The aim of the study Collabri Flex is to: - Develop a Danish model for collaborative care for patients with anxiety in general practice, based on past experience gained in the Collabri Project. - Examine the impact of this model compared with liaison-consultation for people with anxiety in a randomized controlled design from selected endpoints.
Generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) is a condition characterized by chronic and excessive worry and anxiety. Over the past 15 years, the investigators have developed a cognitive-behavioural treatment that leads to the remission of GAD in approximately 60% to 75% of affected individuals. Although these numbers are encouraging, there remain a considerable proportion of patients who do not fully benefit from treatment. With the goal of improving treatment efficacy, the investigators have recently carried out a series of related studies on the way individuals with GAD and high worriers process uncertain or ambiguous information from their environment. The findings show that these individuals display biases in attention for, and appraisal of, uncertain or ambiguous information. Specifically, individuals with GAD and high worriers preferentially allocate their attention to uncertainty-related stimuli and appraise ambiguous information in a threatening manner. In this study, the investigators examine the impact of these information processing biases, measured at intake, on the efficacy of cognitive-behavioural treatment for GAD. The investigators also examine the impact of residual information processing biases, measured at posttreatment, on the maintenance of treatment gains over 18 months following treatment. The main hypotheses are (1) that high levels of pretreatment biases will predict poorer outcomes immediately following therapy, and (2) that high levels of posttreatment biases will predict relapse during the 18 months following therapy. If, as expected, information processing biases predict poor short- and long-term treatment outcomes for individuals with GAD, the investigators will expand the treatment to integrate strategies that directly target these biases in order to increase its efficacy.
Pragmatic randomized controlled trial (expected N = 80) of cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) to contrast two psychotherapeutic implementation strategies (State-of-the-Art welcome phase vs. prolonged focus on sudden changes). Blinded allocation of implementation strategy for patients; open label for therapists (no blinding possible), randomized allocation for patients, therapist allocation via ABAB-design (crossed-therapist design). Post treatment self-reported outcome will be measured based on a latent outcome factor (i. e. "outcome composite").
The literature suggests that Mindfulness Based Intervention may be effective in the treatment of anxiety symptoms. The objective of this study is to compare the clinical effectiveness of a Mindfulness Based Intervention - the Mind in Body Training (MBT) - with a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (Fluoxetine) and an active control group (Quality of Life) through different biological and clinical outcomes, as well as evaluate some possible mechanisms of treatment response. Methods: it is a three armed randomized, controlled clinical trial. Participants with General Anxiety Disorder will be recruited. A community sample of 192 participants will be randomly allocated to the MBT, Fluoxetine or Quality of Life Group. Instruments measuring anxiety, worry and meta-worry symptoms, quality of life, acceptance and self-compassion, mindfulness, rumination and emotion regulation will be applied. The patients will be submitted to Error Related Negativity (ERN) and Heart Rate Variability (HRV) measures. The primary outcome is the effectiveness of MBT compared with Fluoxetine and Quality of Life Group in symptomatic outcomes. The secondary outcome are the effectiveness os these interventions in emotional regulation process and biological measures (ERN and HRV), and the evaluation of BMT mechanisms through possible mediation of treatment response for emotional processes like mindfulness, acceptance and self-compassion, biological changes (ERN and HRV), and metacognition.
The studies proposed in this protocol aim to explore the anxiolytic properties of floating as it relates to the central and autonomic nervous system.
this study examines the emergence of the visual mismatch negativity (vMMN) ERP component in response to deviations from the embedded contingency in attention bias modification treatment (ABMT) for social and generalized anxiety, and the interaction between vMMN emergence and clinical improvement. ***As of September 2017, recruitment of SAD participants has concluded.
Anxiety disorders are the most common mental disorders in community settings, and they are associated with significant psychological distress, functional and social impairment. Although pharmacological and psychological treatments for anxiety and depression have existed for several years now, only a minority of anxiety disorder sufferers are treated according to guidelines. Cognitive behavior therapy (CBT) is the most consistently efficacious psychological treatment for anxiety disorders, but implementation of CBT in primary care is challenging due to limited resources. Recent studies indicate that transdiagnostic group CBT for multiple anxiety disorders could be a promising alternative to individual CBT in primary care. The aim of the study is to examine the effectiveness of group CBT for anxiety disorders as a complement to usual care. The clinical trial will be conducted in three Health and Social Services Centers in the province of Québec (i.e. Sherbrooke, Laval and Québec). Patients will be French-speaking adults with anxiety disorders, and they will be randomly assigned to one of two treatment conditions: a) Transdiagnostic group CBT (12 weekly 2-hour sessions), b) usual care. The transdiagnostic group CBT will be offered as a differed intervention to participants in the usual care group after the 8-month follow up. Participants in both study arms will undergo a baseline clinical evaluation as well as outcome assessment interviews at post-treatment, 4, 8, and 12 month follow-up time-points. The primary study results will include improvement on a questionnaire on anxiety symptoms. Widespread implementation of group CBT could lead to better outcomes for a large number of patients living with anxiety.
Anxiety is among the most prevalent, costly and disabling illnesses and tends emerge early in childhood. Cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) is the first-line treatment for early life anxiety, but as many as 40% of young patients who receive CBT fail to get better. The proposed study will examine brain changes marking positive response to CBT for anxiety and how these changes may differ in children compared adolescents. By helping us to understand how CBT works, this study will pave the way for new treatments to stop anxiety early.