View clinical trials related to Gastrointestinal Neoplasms.
Filter by:This will be a longitudinal, prospective, observational multicenter study where the role of EUS-E will be examined in differentiating subepithelial gastrointestinal tumors in 138 patients
This is a single-arm, prospective, exploratory clinical study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of endostar combined with stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) and Envafolimab in patients with advanced gastrointestinal cancer after multi-line treatment.
This study constitutes a case-control investigation employing a retrospective approach. Plasma samples from individuals with esophageal cancer, benign esophageal diseases, gastric cancer, benign gastric diseases, and a healthy control group were systematically collected. Advanced Data-Independent Acquisition (DIA) proteomics and single-vesicle membrane protein detection techniques were employed to quantify protein content within exosomes. Specific protein biomarkers indicative of early-stage upper gastrointestinal tumors were identified. External validation of these protein markers was conducted using Parallel Reaction Monitoring (PRM) technology on an independent validation cohort. The objective is to establish protein marker predictions for early diagnosis of upper gastrointestinal tumors and prognostication of therapeutic efficacy.
Background: Many cancer cells produce substances called antigens that are unique to each cancer. These antigens stimulate the body s immune responses. One approach to treating these cancers is to take disease-fighting white blood cells from a person, change those cells so they will target the specific proteins (called antigens) from the cancer cells, and return them to that person s blood. The use of the white blood cells in this manner is one form of gene therapy. A vaccine may help these modified white cells work better. Objective: To test a cancer treatment that uses a person s own modified white blood cells along with a vaccine that targets a specific protein. Eligibility: Adults aged 18 to 72 years with certain solid tumors that have spread after treatment. Design: Participants will undergo leukapheresis: Blood is removed from the body through a tube attached to a needle inserted into a vein. The blood passes through a machine that separates out the white blood cells. The remaining blood is returned to the body through a second needle. Participants will stay in the hospital for 3 or 4 weeks. They will take chemotherapy drugs for 1 week to prepare for the treatment. Then their modified white cells will be infused through a needle in the arm. They will take other drugs to prevent infections after the infusion. The vaccine is injected into a muscle; participants will receive their first dose of the vaccine on the same day as their cell infusion. Participants will have follow-up visits 4, 8, and 12 weeks after the cell infusions. They will receive 2 or 3 additional doses of the boost vaccine during these visits. Follow-up will continue for 5 years, but participants will need to stay in touch with the gene therapy team for 15 years. ...
TIER-PC is an adaptive model of delivering palliative care that provides the right level of care to the right patients at the right time. It represents an adaption of the Mount Sinai PALLIATIVE CARE AT HOME (PC@H) program, which delivers home-based palliative care. TIER-PC increases the number and intensity of disciplines added to the patient's care team as their symptoms worsen and function declines. In Tier 1, patients who are able to care for themselves and no/mild symptoms receive a community health worker (CHW) trained to elicit illness understanding in a culturally competent way. In Tier 2, for patients with poorer function and mild symptoms, a social worker (SW), trained in serious illness communication, joins the CHW to further elicit patients' goals and prognostic understanding while communicating symptom needs to their primary clinician. In Tier 3, as function decreases and symptoms increase, an advance practice nurse (APN) joins the CHW and SW to manage complex symptoms. Finally, in Tier 4, for those older adults with the poorest function and most complex symptoms, a physician joins the team to ensure that the most complex needs (e.g., end-of-life treatment preferences and multifaceted symptom control) are met. The CHW follows patients longitudinally across all tiers and re-allocates them to the appropriate tier based on their evolving needs.
Aims to observe and evaluate the impact of survival and quality of life of patients with gastrointestinal tumors such as advanced esophageal, gastric, liver, pancreatic, and colorectal cancers through nutritional-psychological interventions versus no-vomit management compared to standard antitumor therapy alone
Peripheral neuropathy is one of the most common side effects of oxaliplatin (OXA)-based chemotherapy for patients treated for digestive cancers, disabling and dose-limiting. Several strategies have been studied for the treatment of oxaliplatin-related sensory neuropathy. Several pharmacological and non-pharmacological therapeutic strategies have been explored to relieve peripheral neuropathic pain. Non-pharmacological interventions have been shown to be potentially beneficial for patients suffering from chemotherapy-induced neurotoxicity. The objective of this prospective study is to evaluate the effectiveness of photobiomodulation on the reduction of neuropathic pain in patients who developed painful, cumulative peripheral neuropathy that appeared under the effect of the treatment.
This is a phase 1, single-arm, open-label, dose escalation and expansion study of LCAR-G08 in adult subjects with advanced gastrointestinal tumors expressing guanylyl cyclase C (GCC).
This is a real-world observational study of fruquintinib in combination with irinotecan and capecitabine for the second-line treatment of patients with advanced colorectal cancer.
The goal of this prospective, randomized, controlled trial conducted at Baylor St. Luke's Medical Center is to compare the effectiveness and clinical outcomes of using a traction device in colonic endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) to those of using conventional ESD. The investigators of this study hypothesize that use of the traction device will help expedite colonic endoscopic submucosal dissections.