View clinical trials related to Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage.
Filter by:This study aimed to Assess the validity of the Rockall score for the prediction of rebleeding and death in patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding.
The purpose of this study is to determine whether 40 mg octreotide long-acting release intramuscular every 28 days is effective in the treatment of patients with refractory anemia due to gastrointestinal angiodysplasias. We hypothesize that octreotide is effective in reducing the transfusion requirements (consisting of red blood cell transfusions and intravenous iron infusions) of patients with angiodysplasia-related anemia.
Patients with active gastrointestinal bleeding can be included. 5ml of SerasealTM/Fastact (Wortham Laboratories, Chattanooga, USA), a CE-certified medical product for in human intraoperative use as hemostatic agent, is topically applied via catheters to the bleeding site. In group A, Seraseal is applied as initial method for hemostasis. In group B, Seraseal is applied after an initial failure of the institutional standard method. Homeostatic success is determined by 5 min without bleeding at gastrointestinal site. after application of Seraseal.
The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy between video capsule endoscopy and CT enterography in diagnosis of obscure gastrointestinal bleeding.
Introduction: Gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding arising from malignant tumors is increasingly recognized as a result of oncological advances and improved detection methods, and stems from local vessel damage and tumor invasion with associated derangements in the hemostatic system(1, 2). Although conventional endoscopic hemostasis methods improve outcomes in UGIB due to peptic ulcers and other non-variceal benign bleeding lesions of the upper, and perhaps the lower GI tract, data on their use in hemorrhagic, upper or lower gastrointestinal neoplasms are scarce and associated with varying success in initial hemostasis and high rebleeding rates(3-7). Other recognized single or multimodality treatment approaches include radiation therapy, interventional angiography, and surgery. All exhibit disappointing rebleeding rates, and in the case of emergency surgery, high mortality(4, 8-11). Challenges associated with bleeding tumors include hematological derangements such as thrombocytopenia, disseminated intravascular coagulation, and neutropenia, as well as the endoscopic manipulation of friable, diffusely bleeding surfaces when attempting hemostasis(2, 12, 13). The recent advent of TC-325 (HemosprayTM) to Canada, Europe and Asia - referred henceforth as TC-325 - may provide a highly adapted novel endoscopic hemostatic therapeutic alternative for this refractory clinical entity, with promising uncontrolled observations having just been published by our group(13) and others(14). More robust controlled evaluative data are now needed. We propose to study the use of TC-325 in upper and lower malignant GI bleeding compared to contemporary standard of care, and more specifically seeks funding for a pilot study to inform a subsequent peer-review application for a larger, more definitive randomized clinical trial (RCT).
Aim: To evaluate the feasibility and safety of a restrictive versus liberal red blood cell (RBC) transfusion policy in adult patients admitted with Acute Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding (AUGIB) in order to inform the design of a definitive phase III randomised controlled trial.
This study is to evaluate the performance of Hemospray for the teatment of nonvariceal lower gastrointestinal bleeding.
There were many approaches for patients with obscure gastrointestinal bleeding (OGIB). Capsule endoscopy (CE), double-balloon endoscopy, deep small-bowel spiral enteroscopy, laparoscopy, computed tomography and angiography have been recommended as investigation. However, of these techniques, the evaluation and management of patients with OGIB remains a formidable challenge. We compared the diagnostic yield and long-term outcomes of patients with OGIB randomized to angiogram combination laparoscopy or angiogram alone.
Based on limited published epidemiological data, up to an alarming 1 in 50 surgical inpatients die within 30 postoperative days. Based on our own data from the B-Unaware (NCT00281489) and BAG-RECALL (NCT00682825) clinical trials, 30-day postoperative mortality among high-risk surgical patients is comparable to this at Barnes-Jewish Hospital, and 1-year mortality among high-risk surgical patients may be as high as 10%. Short- and intermediate-term postoperative mortality is therefore a pressing public health concern. Similarly, postoperative major morbidity - including delirium, stroke, myocardial infarction, atrial fibrillation, blood clots, renal dysfunction, wound infection, pneumonia, respiratory failure, loss of functionality, and chronic pain - occurs commonly and affects a substantial proportion of surgical patients, critically ill patients and patients undergoing procedures for chronic pain. Many factors associate strongly and independently with postoperative mortality and major morbidity: patient age, functional status, comorbid medical conditions, and duration and invasiveness of surgery, among others. It is a strategic priority to identify pre- and intraoperative risk factors that are subject to modification.
The prophylactic APC right after colonic EMR doesn't mean the complete coagulation of visible vessel because of injection material. The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical feature of the visible vessels in ulcer base over time after prophylactic APC in colonic EMR.