View clinical trials related to Free Gingival Graft.
Filter by:In patients with high frenal attachment will placement of free gingival graft combined with frenotomy result in gain of width of keratinized gingiva, decrease relapse, improve mucosal healing and have acceptable postoperative pain?
After harvesting free gingival graft from the hard palate, Postoperative pain as well as bleeding are the most common complications.Different agents were used to protect the denuded areas on the palate as gelatin sponge, Hyaluronic acid gel and platelet rich fibrin (PRF) but still no gold standard material is present. PICO format: P: patients with mucogingival problems in need for free gingival graft or de-epithelialized connective tissue graft.I: Flowable resin composite stent. C: Periodontal pack. O: Post-operative pain T: day 3, 7, 14, 21 and 42 postoperative. Aim of the study: To compare the effect of flowable composite stent versus periodontal pack applied to palatal donor site after free gingival graft harvesting in terms of post-operative pain reduction.
Gingival recession on vestibular surfaces of teeth is a frequent occurrence in patients with high standards of oral hygiene, affecting all types of teeth. During the last three decades, several surgical techniques have been proposed to treat single and multiple gingival recessions: pedicled flaps (laterally displaced (CDL) or coronally advanced (ACC) flaps), free gingival grafts (IGL), bilaminar techniques or procedures regenerative.
The goal of this study was to compare, clinical and histologically, the use of the suine collagen matrix (Mucograft Seal [MS], Geisthlich®) and the free gingival graft (FGG) for the alveolar sealing after inserted bone graft biomaterial. It was included 18 patients with tooth referred to extraction (maxilar incisives, canines, or pre-molars) which were randomly divided in 2 groups, according to the material for alveolus sealing: control (FGG) and test (MS). After the minimally traumatic extraction, all the alveoli were filled with bovine mineral matrix (Bio-Oss®), and the material for alveolar sealing were positioned and stabilized with sutures. The follow-up (clinical and photographic) happened on the immediate post-operatory period, and with 3, 7, 15, 30, 60, 90, and 120 days. After 120 days, before implant placement, tissues samples were obtained with a 3.5mm punch scalpel for histological analysis. Qualitative information related to the patient's perception considering the treatment were collected.
The main aim of soft tissue grafts is to treat mucogingival defects such as exposed root surfaces or augment gingival tissue dimensions. In single or multiple root coverage procedures, autogenous grafts are considered to be the gold standard. where the palate is considered to be the most frequent site for graft harvesting, this procedure is accompanied with complications such as postoperative pain and bleeding. Despite all materials used in the literature, no proven golden standard exits. This study will compare the effect of Nano-Bio Fusion gingival gel versus natural healing with stent as a palatal dressing in the management of wound healing and pain.
A patient specific surgical guide for harvesting of free gingival graft from the palate
The aim of this clinical study is to evaluate the significance of keratinized mucosa and to investigate the influence of free gingival graft procedure on peri-implant health status in patients after prothesis delivery.
Free gingival graft (FGG) was first proposed by Bjorn 1963 and Nabers 1966. FGG is indicated to correct mucogingival problems such as inadequate or lack of attached gingiva and gingival recession. The most frequent donor site for free gingival graft is the palate Although, great concern has been given to the recipient sites by using different techniques as suturing, tissue adhesives and special dressings, a little attention was given to protect the donor sites after free gingival graft harvesting. The palatal donor site heal by secondary intention, it could take around 2 to 4 weeks depending on the width and thickness of the tissue removed.The common clinical events that occurs following FGG procedure are patient's discomfort, pain and bleeding at the donor site.
There are studies investigating the dimensional changes following free gingival graft (FGG) around teeth with inadequate attached gingiva, however no study investigating the effect of smoking on dimensional changes following FGG around dental implants exists. In the present study, we hypothesized that smoking might increase the dimensional change of FGG around dental implants and affect the healing of donor site.