View clinical trials related to Free Gingival Graft.
Filter by:After harvesting free gingival graft from the hard palate, Postoperative pain as well as bleeding are the most common complications.Different agents were used to protect the denuded areas on the palate as gelatin sponge, Hyaluronic acid gel and platelet rich fibrin (PRF) but still no gold standard material is present. PICO format: P: patients with mucogingival problems in need for free gingival graft or de-epithelialized connective tissue graft.I: Flowable resin composite stent. C: Periodontal pack. O: Post-operative pain T: day 3, 7, 14, 21 and 42 postoperative. Aim of the study: To compare the effect of flowable composite stent versus periodontal pack applied to palatal donor site after free gingival graft harvesting in terms of post-operative pain reduction.
The main aim of soft tissue grafts is to treat mucogingival defects such as exposed root surfaces or augment gingival tissue dimensions. In single or multiple root coverage procedures, autogenous grafts are considered to be the gold standard. where the palate is considered to be the most frequent site for graft harvesting, this procedure is accompanied with complications such as postoperative pain and bleeding. Despite all materials used in the literature, no proven golden standard exits. This study will compare the effect of Nano-Bio Fusion gingival gel versus natural healing with stent as a palatal dressing in the management of wound healing and pain.