View clinical trials related to Fractures, Bone.
Filter by:Rib fractures are common after blunt injury to the chest. Present in 10% of blunt trauma admissions. Pain associated with rib fractures can result in compromise of pulmonary function causing hypoxaemia or pneumonia, which may require mechanical ventilation. Adequate relief of rib fracture pain allows the patient to breathe deeply, avoid intubation and clear secretions effectively, which will minimise the pulmonary complications . Pain control is essential for not only primary pain relief but also preventing secondary complications such as atelectasis or pneumonia as well as the transition to chronic pain. Accordingly, further steps are now being taken from the conventional pain control medication and techniques by the introduction of more aggressive pain control measures .Traditional regional anaesthesia (RA) techniques such as paravertebral, intercostal and epidurals injections are resource-intensive and time-consuming, limited to single dermatomes; provide incomplete analgesia of the hemithorax; and are associated with significant potential complications such as local anaesthetic intoxication, vasovagal syncope, hemi diaphragmatic paresis and pneumothorax . The erector spinae plane block (ESPB) is a novel fascial plane block. Its use has been documented in numerous instances with positive outcomes in controlling acute as well as chronic pain. The most popular technique was the continuous infusion through a catheter . Fascial plane blocks that can be used for rib fracture pain management are serratus anterior plane block, erector spinae plane block and the rhomboid intercostal and subserratus (RISS) block. The procedure is more simple to use with a lower incidence of complications ,less time consuming , more superficial than others so it can be used in patients on anticoagulant therapy . Providing analgesia for patients with rib fractures continues to be a management challenge. Therefore, further studies are needed comparing between different techniques to prove their efficacy in pain management
Fractures of the distal end of the radius are one of the most frequent fractures diagnosed in the emergency room. The initial management, and in many cases definitive, is carried out through manipulation, closed reduction and immobilization in the emergency room. Different methods of anesthesia have been described to reduce pain during the manipulation and reduction procedure, such as: hematoma block, periosteal block, general anesthesia, intravenous regional anesthesia, nitrous oxide, intramuscular sedation, and conscious sedation. Despite the use of different methods of anesthesia, none is fully effective and each of these methods is not free of complications. Adjuvant measures could play an important role in improving the patient's experience during the procedure, however, there is little evidence in this regard. Music is increasingly being studied and developed as an adjunctive therapy in the management of pain and anxiety in different medical procedures, demonstrating a statistically significant reduction in pain and anxiety. However, in the literature there is no evidence of studies that evaluate the effect of music during the reduction of fractures in traumatology as an adjuvant therapy for the management of pain and anxiety. In our experience, despite the anesthesia used, reductions of distal radius fractures are usually a painful procedure that involves a certain degree of discomfort for the patient. For this reason, the investigators believe this study is necessary, as it could demonstrate a new adjuvant therapy that reduces pain and anxiety and improves the overall experience of the patient, in addition to being music, a low-cost tool with no risks for patient safety.
The goal of this clinical trial is to compare the effectiveness of a new 14-week individually-tailored home-based rehabilitation program called "Stronger at Home" with usual care in improving functional recovery in community-dwelling older adults after hip fractures. The main question this trial aims to answer are: • Is the Stronger at Home program more effective than usual care in improving functional recovery at the end of the 14-week intervention? secondary questions include: - What is the cost-utility of the Stronger at Home program compared to usual care at 3.5 months, 6 months, and 12 months after discharge? - Does the program have a sustained impact on functional recovery at 6 months and 12 months post-discharge? Participants in the trial will be asked to engage in the following tasks: - Participate in the Stronger at Home program, which includes using a self-directed toolkit consisting of educational resources and an illustrated exercise program. - Follow the guidelines provided in the toolkit for gradually increasing exercise intensity and incorporating different types of exercises into their daily life. The effects of the Stronger at Home program will be compared to those of usual care.
The overall objective of this pilot study is to test a comprehensive nutritional intervention in elderly patients diagnosed with hip fracture, which the study team believe will reduce functional decline, morbidity and mortality.
The goal of this interventional randomized controlled trial is to compare the clinical outcomes in treating extremities pathological fractures (fractures of limbs caused by metastatic tumors) or impending pathological fractures with short or long intramedullary nails. The main questions it aims to answer are: 1. What is the rate of developing new distant metastasis of the operated extremities? 2. Does treating extremities (impending) pathological fractures with long intramedullary nails have lower or similar reoperation rate than the short nails? 3. Are there any differences when comparing the surgical-related complication, functional outcomes and life quality assessment between treating extremities (impending) pathological fractures with long or short intramedullary nails. Participants who meet surgical indication will be randomized into either the long or short intramedullary nail group after informed consent. The patient will receive bone fixation with the corresponding prosthesis.
The purpose of this prospective study is to evaluate and compare the accuracy of elbow ultrasonography with X Ray radiography for the diagnosis of elbow fractures in children following trauma in order to detect the validity of US in diagnosis of fractures as a dependent tool.
1. FULL TITLE OF THE PROJECT Should we use post-operative antibiotics following surgery for patients with mandible fractures? The MANTRA trial (MANdibular TRauma and Antibiotic use) 2. SUMMARY OF RESEARCH (ABSTRACT) Research Question: Are post-operative antibiotics required following surgery for patients with mandible fractures? Background: Mandible fractures are the commonest facial fractures needing surgery and account for a significant percentage of the acute workload in Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery (OMFS) units. The UK records over 6000 new cases per year. Patients having surgery for mandible fractures have a theoretical risk of developing surgical site infection, due to the proximity of the fracture lines to the oral cavity microbes and the presence of foreign body (titanium fixation miniplates). For this reason, clinicians often prescribe antibiotics after surgery, to reduce the risk of infection. Previous systematic reviews and a multicentre cohort study performed by this team, revealed significant clinical variation in post-operative antibiotic prescription amongst UK OMFS clinicians and the presence of clinical equipoise. Antibiotic overuse can lead to antibiotic resistance and other antibiotic-related side effects; judicious antibiotic use and stewardship is of paramount importance. Aim: To determine whether post-operative antibiotics are required at all, following surgery for mandible fractures, and, if so, what is the most clinically- and cost-effective regimen Objectives: Primary Objective To conduct a Randomized Controlled Trial (MANTRA) in order to establish the non-inferiority (or not) of not giving post-operative antibiotics versus 2 other post-operative antibiotic regimens. An internal pilot phase will optimise recruitment and retention. Secondary Objectives - Measure the cost-effectiveness of the proposed antibiotic pathways - Assess patient and clinician acceptability to change clinical practice - Process evaluation to inform dissemination and implementation Methods: The investigators designed and propose the MANTRA RCT to compare 3 post-operative antibiotic approaches to prevent Surgical Site Infections (SSIs) following surgery for mandible fractures. The MANTRA trial is a large open label, multicentre study in NHS OMFS units. The 3 study arms represent the most common clinical pathways in the UK based on previous work; the control group is the approach prescribed by most UK OMFS clinicians. All patients will receive 1 dose of IV antibiotics (co-amoxiclav 1.2g, if no penicillin allergy, which is the most commonly used prophylactic antibiotic currently) on induction of anaesthesia, prior to their surgery. The participants will be randomised to the following (1:1:1): Group A: No further antibiotics Group B: 2 further postoperative IV doses of co-amoxiclav 1.2g Group C: 2 further postoperative IV doses (as above), followed by a 5-day course of oral co-amoxiclav 625mg every 8 hours if no penicillin allergy (Control). Trial processes will be optimised by an internal pilot phase ensuring we recruit, randomise, and retain participants with clear progression criteria. We will also conduct cost-effectiveness analyses and process evaluation for dissemination and implementation Timeline: Start of grant: 1st July 2023 Start of RCT / pilot: 1st January 2024 End of pilot: 30th June 2024 End of recruitment: 31st December 2026 End of follow-up: 30th June 2027 Completion: 31st December 2027 Impact and dissemination: - Practice changing outputs that standardise the use of antibiotics in mandible fractures in the NHS and provide a framework for other surgical prophylaxis research - A bespoke clinical dissemination plan via an engagement and training legacy - Cost-effectiveness data to inform policy making - A research legacy and change of culture in the specialty of OMFS
The goal of this monocenter randomized pilot study is to investigate the usability of the ADEPTH sensor for bore depth measurements in plate osteosynthesis procedures. The main question it aims to answer is: - What is the usability score of the ADEPTH sensor for bore depth measurements during plate osteosynthesis procedures? Participants will receive either bore depth measurements with the ADEPTH sensor or with the manual depth gauge.
The aim of this study is to compare the effect of Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation (PNF) techniques on functional status, pain, range of motion (ROM), muscle strength, quality of life, and patient satisfaction in people with Proximal Humerus Fracture. There will be two groups, PNF and conservative treatment, and the program will consist of 6 weeks. Patients will randomly be assigned to the conservative treatment group and the PNF group. Patients in the conservative group will deliver shoulder muscle static stretching, active-assistive ROM exercises, scapular mobilization, posterior capsule stretching, and isometric strengthening for 3 weeks. Between 3-6 weeks these exercises will progress and shoulder muscles strengthening via Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation (NMES) and active ROM exercises will add to the program. Patients in the PNF group will deliver PNF stretching, active-assistive ROM exercises, PNF scapular patterns mobilization, posterior capsule stretching, and isometric strengthening for 3 weeks. Between 3-6 weeks PNF stretching and scapular mobilization exercises will progress and PNF strengthening and active ROM exercises will add to the program.
Patients suffering from a proximal humerus fracture treated with plate osteosynthesis will receive either regular aftercare (physiotherapy) or aftercare assisted with continous passive motion (physiotherapy + CPM). Change in functional and patient-reported outcome (PROM) over time will be evaluated and compared.