View clinical trials related to Fracture.
Filter by:A randomised controlled clinical feasibility trial to determine the feasibility and acceptability of a "musculoskeletal health package (MHP)" intervention in women undergoing pelvic radiotherapy for gynaecological malignancies and inform power calculations for a definitive trial.
The goal of this clinical validation is to assess comparative performances of physicians with and without the assistance of BoneView for the diagnosis of fractures on radiographs. The performances are evaluated in terms of accuracy (primary endpoint with the pair specificity/sensitivity and the secondary endpoint PPV/NPV) and in terms of time needed for diagnosis (secondary endpoint with the measurement of time on each case).
Falls of the elderly are a public health problem that have been neglected for too long. The experience of a fall makes the elderly person vulnerable, even in the absence of traumatic consequences, and can sometimes be a reason for institutionalization. These falls are frequent and have many repercussions on the autonomy of seniors. According to data from the National Institute for Prevention and Health Education (INPES), falls are the leading cause of accidental death among people over 65 years of age. They cause approximately 8,500 deaths per year. After the age of 65, one person in three falls at least once a year. They account for 10% of the reasons for consultation and 12% of hospitalizations in geriatric settings among the elderly. The risk increases with age because 80% of people over 85 years of age fall at least once a year. 20 to 30% of people over 65 have a loss or decrease in autonomy after a fall. The risk of another fall is twenty times higher after a first fall and the risk of death increases especially in the year following the fall. This is of major importance because falls are responsible for the majority of fractures in the elderly, especially femoral neck fractures. The cost of falls among the elderly is significant and estimated at 2 billion euros for communities.
The outcome of implant therapy has been presented in the majority of clinical studies by focusing only on implant survival without providing detailed information on the reconstructions . However, for decision making, it is important to know the survival rates and the incidence of biological and technical complications not only for the implants but also for the reconstructions. Thus, the selection of restoration materials should be based on proper optical characteristics in addition to biocompatibility and sufficient strength of materials. Monolithic zirconia has been used in posterior region, especially for single crowns, in order to eliminate the veneer cracking, But Since monolithic zirconia are relatively new, few randomized, controlled clinical studies have evaluated their success. There is only one study identified regarding the performance of monolithic ceramic restorations bonded to Ti inserts, investigating the clinical outcome of using monolithic or modified monolithic zirconia implant-supported single crowns and comparing outcomes and complications of metal-ceramic and monolithic or modified monolithic zirconia implant supported single crowns. More clinical studies to evaluate the performance of CAD/CAM monolithic implant-supported restorations bonded to Ti inserts and bases and compare their survival, success and complication rates with other restorative options [with a mean follow-up period of at least 5 years are required for a meaningful interpretation of the survival and complication rate . So this study aims to investigate outcomes and complications of implant supported modified monolithic zirconia and metal-ceramic single crowns in the posterior region of the mouth. The null hypothesis is that there is no difference between modified monolithic zirconia and metal-ceramic posterior implant-supported SCs in prosthetic complication rates.
Boys aged 9-12 years, with a history of facture will be asked to stand on one of two vibrating platforms for 10 minutes on 5 consecutive days. The investigators will take blood samples before and after the vibration to measure changes in the bone cells.
When a child less than 2 years old attends the Emergency Department (ED) with an injury, carers should offer an explanation. When there is no explanation or if the explanation is inconsistent & because the child cannot say what happened, the doctor will need to consider all possible causes including child abuse. To help exclude abuse, the doctor will request x-rays of all the child's bones to make sure there are no other unexplained fractures. This requires up to 20 x-rays, which are called a skeletal survey. Even if there are no fractures, some or all of the x-rays will be repeated in the following 7-21 days, because by that time any fractures will have started to heal and so are easier to see than on the first skeletal survey. It means that if a doctor is worried about abuse, the child may need to have up to 40 x-rays, which amounts to a significant radiation dose (more than 6 months of natural UK background radiation) & increases the child's lifetime risk of getting cancer. 79 to 97 out of 100 skeletal surveys performed are normal. While it is of paramount importance to identify if a child is being abused, it is also important to minimise radiation dose. A camera which detects light and heat given off by the body has shown promise in some areas of medical practice. We plan to compare the results from the camera to those of the skeletal survey in 40 children below 2 years of age attending our hospital over a 6-month period. We hope to demonstrate that this technology can be used to further select children who should have a skeletal survey, reducing radiation dose in children without missing those who are being abused and sending them home to be abused again.
Orthopedic injuries comprise more than 10% of ED visits in children and 25 to 50% of children will sustain a fracture before age 16 years. Distal radius fractures account for 20-32% of fractures in children, making them the most common fracture type. Between 20 and 40% of extremity fractures in children require a closed reduction, often necessitating procedural sedation and analgesia (PSA). Intravenous (IV) ketamine is the most commonly used sedative agent used to perform a closed reduction. However, children rate IV insertion as the most painful hospital experience, second only to the injury itself. IV insertion can be more technically difficult in children because of smaller veins and lack of cooperation, often leading to multiple IV attempts. A combination of intranasal (IN) dexmedetomidine plus ketamine (IN Ketodex) may provide effective sedation for children undergoing a closed reduction without the distress and pain related to IV insertion. A less painful experience has been found to correlate with child satisfaction which may reduce caregiver anxiety and improve the therapeutic relationship with the health care team. This study is a multi-centre, two-arm, randomized, blinded, controlled, non-inferiority trial designed to test the hypothesis that IN Ketodex is non-inferior to intravenous (IV) ketamine with respect to depth of sedation as measured using the Pediatrics Sedation State Scale (PSSS).
In this study, patients who underwent lumbar spine surgery in our hospital were included. A prospective study was conducted to investigate the effects of early mobilisation on postoperative complications, functual outcomes and patient satisfaction after robotic assisted lumbar spinal surgery.
WRIGHT FOOT & ANKLE POST-MARKET OBSERVATIONAL STUDY, Multi-Year, Multi-Site, Multi-Device, Post-Market Observational Study, 10 sites, a minimum of 40 patients per device
By using national databases in Sweden the aim of the present project is to: 1. Investigate if the incidence of our most common diseases, such as fracture and cardiovascular disease, has changed from 1970-2017 2. To investigate whether the risk of death for our most common diseases have changed from 1970-2017. 3. To investigate the risk of a new episode after suffering from our most common diseases from 1970-2017 4. To investigate the risk factors for our most common diseases, and whether these have changed from 1970. 5. To investigate how severe disease or death affects the health of a close relative.