Fentanyl Versus Tramadol as Co-administrator to Bupivacaine

Forearm Clinical Trial

Official title:

Fentanyl Versus Tramadol as Co-administrator to Bupivacaine in Ultrasound-guided Supraclavicular Brachial Plexus Blockade: Pons and Cons

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

• NCT number: NCT04666337
• Other study ID #: 337/2/19
• Status: Completed
• Phase: N/A
• Start date: February 15, 2019
• Est. completion date: September 30, 2020

Study information

• Verified date: December 2020
• Source: Aswan University Hospital
• Contact: n/a
• Is FDA regulated: No
• Study type: Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

Supraclavicular brachial plexus approach is an alternative technique to general anesthesia resulting in a fast onset of a reliable blockage of the brachial plexus. The use of ultrasound for the performance of supraclavicular block has become the gold standard since it enables the clinician to deposit the local anesthetic close to the nerves in real-time that improves the success rate with a safety margin. Adjuvants are added to local anesthetic in Supraclavicular Brachial Plexus Blockade to improve the quality of nerve blocks and the duration of analgesia. It should be noted that no adjuvant has been approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the prolongation of peripheral nerve blocks

Description:

There are multiple controversies among the previous studies for the use of different opioids as adjuvants for brachial plexus blockade to improve various block characteristics. Moreover, limited studies estimate the pons and cons of tramadol versus fentanyl as co-administrator to bupivacaine in Ultrasound-guided Supraclavicular Brachial Plexus Blockade. In our study, we aim to assess the utility of fentanyl versus tramadol as co-administrator to bupivacaine in ultrasound-guided supraclavicular brachial plexus blockade in upper limb surgeries in a prospective randomized controlled fashion. The primary outcome is to compare between the efficacy of tramadol versus fentanyl as adjuvants on the onset and duration of sensory and motor block and the secondary outcome is to compare between the efficacy of tramadol versus fentanyl as adjuvants on postoperative analgesia, time of the request to rescue analgesia, postoperative analgesic consumption, and complications. The patients were aged between 18 and 60, both gender, and the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I/II. However, patients who had bleeding disorders got opioid analgesics or monoamine oxidase inhibitors before surgery, had a history of seizures, respiratory or cardiac diseases, local infections at the site where needle for the block is to be inserted, pregnant woman and in whom the block effect was partial and required supplementary anesthesia were excluded from the study. Patients were randomly allocated into three groups for ultrasound-guided supraclavicular brachial plexus block. Randomization was established using the computer-generated closed envelopes method. Group B (bupivacaine group): patients received 20 ml bupivacaine 0.5% plus 2 ml normal saline Group F (fentanyl group): patients received 20 ml bupivacaine 0.5% plus fentanyl (1µg/kg-2 ml) Group T (tramadol group): patients received 20 ml bupivacaine 0.5% plus tramadol (1mg/kg-2 ml)

Recruitment information / eligibility

• Status: Completed
• Enrollment: 66
• Est. completion date: September 30, 2020
• Est. primary completion date: August 31, 2020
• Accepts healthy volunteers: No
• Gender: All
• Age group: 18 Years to 60 Years

Eligibility

Inclusion Criteria:

• American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I/II. scheduled for forearm or hand surgery

Exclusion Criteria:

• bleeding disorders
• patients who got opioid analgesics or monoamine oxidase inhibitors before surgery,
• history of seizures, respiratory or cardiac diseases
• local infections at the site where the needle for the block is to be inserted
• a pregnant woman
• the block effect was partial and required supplementary anesthesia

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

• Acquired Deformity of Elbow
• Congenital Abnormalities
• Forearm
• Hand
• Wrist

Intervention

Procedure:
• ultrasound-guided supraclavicular brachial plexus blockade
Ultrasound-guided supraclavicular brachial plexus block was done using an ultrasound machine (Philips; Model: OTD020, AcBel Polytech Inc., Taiwan) with a 5-10 MHz linear probe. The brachial plexus and its relation to the surrounding structures were viewed while the patient was supine and the head turned 45° to the contralateral side. In the supraclavicular fossa, the probe was placed in the coronal plane to visualize the subclavian artery and the brachial plexus in a transverse sectional view. After skin sterilization and local anesthetic administration, an insulated needle was then introduced lateral to the ultrasound probe and parallel to the long axis of the probe. Once the needle penetrated the brachial plexus cluster, the local anesthetic mixture was injected incrementally after negative aspiration for blood or air just next to the artery, then the needle was repositioned to inject on the upper pole of the artery.

Locations

Country	Name	City	State
Egypt	Aswan University Hospital	Aswan

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor	Collaborator
Aswan University Hospital

Country where clinical trial is conducted

Egypt, 

Outcome

Type	Measure	Description	Time frame	Safety issue
Primary	Onset time of sensory block in minutes	After the injection of the solution, every patient was checked for the onset of sensory blockade using goose soaked with iced normal saline by the following scale (three-point scale): Grade 0= perceived as normal sensation, Grade 1 = loss of cold sensation (analgesia), Grade 2= loss of sensation of touch (anesthesia).	40 minutes
Primary	onset time of motor blockade in minutes using the modified Bromage scale (Three-point scale)	the modified Bromage scale (Three-point scale): Grade 0: Normal motor function, Grade 1: Decreased motor strength with the ability to move the fingers only, Grade 2: Complete motor block with an inability to move the fingers.	40 minutes
Primary	Duration of sensory block in hours	It's the time from sensory block onset to the time of restoration of sensation at the surgical site	24 hours
Primary	Duration of motor block in hours	It's the time from motor block onset to the restoration of global mobility in the hand and the wrist.	24 hours
Secondary	Visual analog scale (VAS): the VAS consisted of a straight, vertical 10-cm line; the bottom point represented "no pain" = (0 cm) and the top "the worst pain you ever have" = (10 cm).	Patients were asked to rate their pain intensity at 1, 2, 4, 6, 12, 18, and 24 h after the block	24 hours
Secondary	Postoperative first analgesic request time in hours	was taken from the time of complete sensory block to the request to rescue analgesia when VAS > 4 cm.	24 hours
Secondary	Rescue analgesia in the form of 0.05 mg/kg morphine sulfate intravenously	was given when VAS = 4 cm	24 hours
Secondary	Mean blood pressure in mmHg	was measured before the block (0 min) and at 5, 10, 15, 30 min then 1, 2, 3, 6, 12,18and 24 h after the block	24 hours
Secondary	heart rate in beats / minute	was measured before the block (0 min) and at 5, 10, 15, 30 min then 1, 2, 3, 6, 12,18and 24 h after the block.	24 hours
Secondary	peripheral oxygen saturation	was measured before the block (0 min) and at 5, 10, 15, 30 min then 1, 2, 3, 6, 12,18and 24 h after the block.	24 hours