View clinical trials related to Food Preferences.
Filter by:The aim of this study is to compare the impact of 4 different types of front of package (FOP) food and beverage messages: 1) green labels on healthy foods, 2) red/yellow/green labels on less healthy/moderately healthy/healthy foods, 3) physical activity calorie equivalent labels, and 4) posters reminding consumers of the sweetened beverage tax on consumers' beverage and snack selections.
The aim of this study is to compare responses to 5 different types of labels for restaurant menus: 1) Control (non-sustainability-label: neutral labels not referencing environmental sustainability); 2) Numeric text-only sustainability label; 3) Endorsement text-only sustainability label; 4) Endorsement icon-only sustainability label; 5) Endorsement text-plus-icon sustainability label. Participants will be randomized to 1 of the 5 labeling arms above. Each participant will view 3 labels (shown in random order) from their randomly assigned labeling arm and respond to survey questions about each label (e.g., attention, perceived effectiveness).
The goal of this clinical trial is to enrich the hamburger meatball with psyllium without impairing its sensory properties and to investigate the effects on acute postprandial lipemia and glycemia, prospective food intake, and some appetite indicators in healthy adults. The main hypotheses of the study are: 1. There is no difference in sensory analysis results between hamburger meatballs enriched with psyllium and those that are not enriched. 2. The rise in postprandial lipids after consuming psyllium-enriched hamburger meatballs is lower than that of classic hamburgers. 3. The rise in postprandial glycemia after consuming psyllium-enriched hamburger meatballs is lower than that of classic hamburgers. 4. The feeling of satiety after consuming psyllium-enriched hamburger meatballs lasts longer, and the feeling of hunger lasts for a shorter period compared to classic hamburgers. 5. Daily food intake after consuming psyllium-enriched hamburger meatballs is less than that of classic hamburgers. Participants will, - Eat hamburgers, after fasting for 12 hours, with psyllium-enriched and classic meatballs on intervention days. - Keep a record of their food intake for the previous and following 24 hours of each intervention. - Be given fasting and postprandial blood samples. - Evaluate their hunger and satiety levels on a 100 mm horizontal visual analog scale (VAS) at the beginning and every hour for the following 6 hours of the study.
The overall objective of the research project is to characterize the consequences of digital food stimuli exposure on eating behavior. Specifically, we aim to study cephalic phase physiology, food choice and quantity, as well as post-ingestive sensations in response to viewing sensory-specific food pictures. Furthermore, we want to examine whether these outcomes depend on sweet taste liking, as determined by FGF21 concentrations in the blood and the phenotypical Sweet Taste Liker Test. Section 2.1 lists the primary hypotheses.
This online randomized clinical trial will test the effects of restaurant menu carbon footprint labels on consumers' choices and perceptions of restaurant menu items.
The aim of this study is to compare the impact of 5 different types of front of package (FOP) food and beverage labels: 1) calorie labels [control], 2) green labels on healthy foods, 3) red/yellow/green labels on less healthy/moderately healthy/healthy foods, 4) physical activity calorie equivalent labels, and 5) "High in" nutrient warning labels) on consumers' beverage and snack selections.
To evaluate whether or not high quality protein intake from a mixed meal can be increased by using culinary herbs and spices to increase flavor intensity and food item liking in older adults.
Nearly a quarter of global greenhouse gas emissions originate from agriculture. Consumer demand for food, especially carbon-intensive red meats, largely underlies these emissions. Therefore, reducing consumption of red meat has the potential for transformative impacts on climate change. Our interdisciplinary team of researchers and dining staff aims to determine the carbon impact of evidence-based behavior change interventions to reduce red meat consumption at University of Michigan dining halls. Using an experimental design, we will evaluate the impacts of three "nudge" interventions (i.e., modifying environmental cues and incentives) to reduce red meat consumption in three randomly assigned treatment dining halls vis-à-vis three paired control dining halls. Nudges will include changing default food items and altering food labels. We will: 1) collect data on meals served during each intervention periods to assess the separate and combined effects of the interventions on red meat consumption; 2) conduct e-mail interviews with students to understand treatment effect heterogeneity and sociodemographic determinants of food choice; and, 3) conduct focus group discussions and interviews, respectively, with students and dining staff to assess implementation feasibility. We expect that this research will generate scalable, replicable solutions for reducing greenhouse gas emissions through dietary change at universities and similar institutions, will significantly advance the food choice literature, and will influence sustainability strategies at university dining operations nationally given the proposed team's close partnership with regional and national dining programs.
The aim of this study is to determine the degree to which sugar-sweetened beverages (SSB) warning labels increase consumers' knowledge about the potential health harms of SSBs and reduce SSB purchases and consumption. 216 racially and ethnically diverse parents of children 6-11 years old will be recruited to buy snacks and beverages for four weeks via an online store that ships participants their purchases. Participants will be randomized to either 1) calorie labels (control); or 2) sugar graphic warning labels. The investigators hypothesize that sugar graphic warning labels displayed in an online store in weeks 2-4 will lead to the greatest reductions from week 1 across both primary outcomes compared to the control group that will only see calorie labels.
This project aims to assess if food choice is impacted by loss aversion (LA), and if this differs based on genetic predisposition to LA, in a UK healthy cohort.