View clinical trials related to Fissure in Ano.
Filter by:This is a randomized comparative clinical trial carried out to compare between laser ablation and surgery in treating anal diseases in inflammatory bowel diseases patients and find out if one is superior to the other. Inflammatory bowel diseases patients with anal problems were divided into 2 groups, one group had traditional surgery and the other had laser ablation for anal diseases and results were compared between the 2 groups.
The aim of this single-center prospective observational trial is to study the influence of physical and psychological factors on the intensity of pain syndrome after anorectal interventions and to determine the association between the physiological pain threshold before surgery and the level of pain syndrome after anorectal surgery. Participants undergoing surgical treatment for anorectal diseases will be asked to complete the questionnaires before and after surgery, all information will be collected to identify risk factors for severe pain syndrome after surgery. The pain threshold test will be conducted to determine the association with pain after surgery.
The eligible population consisted of individuals with anal fissure awaiting surgical intervention. Individuals aged 18 years or older were included, diagnosed with anal fissure and who voluntarily agreed to participate in the research. Those who had some pelvic inflammation and who had already undergone a surgical procedure and had recurrence were excluded from the studyThe selected individuals underwent a standardized anamnesis of the service, answered questionnaires on symptoms of intestinal constipation (Rome IV Criteria and the Bristol Scale), underwent a physical evaluation by a trained professional, and then began the application of the research protocol. The Antares brand Laser device was used for 3 sessions with an interval of 24 hours. The Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) was used before starting treatment, after the first and second sessions, and 1 week after the third session. In addition, at the end of the treatment, the closure, or not, of the lesion was verified, and the questionnaires performed prior to phototherapy were reapplied. The VAS assesses the patient's level of pain, which can be divided into mild pain (1-2), moderate pain (3-7), and severe pain (8-10). The Bristol Scale is based on the identification of the patient's consistency of stools, while types 1-2 correspond to constipation, 3-4 indicate normal intestinal rhythm, 5 indicate lack of fiber, and 6-7 correspond to diarrhea.
Study Description: The goal of this clinical trial is to compare the duration of postoperative pain relief achieved with two different approaches to pudendal nerve block in patients undergoing elective perianal surgery. The main question this study aims to answer is whether adding Methylene Blue to Bupivacaine pudendal nerve block can prolong postoperative analgesia compared to using Bupivacaine alone. Participants in this study will be individuals with ASA I and II physical status undergoing elective perianal surgery under spinal anesthesia. They will be randomly assigned to one of two groups: 1. Group A (Case Group): Participants will receive a pudendal nerve block with Bupivacaine combined with Methylene Blue. 2. Group B (Control Group): Participants will receive a pudendal nerve block with Bupivacaine alone. The pudendal nerve block will be performed using ultrasound guidance at the level of the ischial spine. The needle tip will be positioned between the Sacro tuberous and sacrospinous ligaments to inject the local anesthetic or the local anesthetic combined with Methylene Blue. Throughout the study, the researchers will monitor the time to the first rescue analgesic, assess pain levels using the Numeric Rating Scale at various time intervals (2, 6, 24, 48 hours, and 7 days), and observe for any side effects or complications related to the intervention. Participants will be closely observed after surgery to assess their pain levels and analgesic requirements. The researchers will also evaluate patient satisfaction using the Likert scale. By comparing the outcomes between the two groups, the study aims to determine if the addition of Methylene Blue to Bupivacaine pudendal nerve block provides superior postoperative analgesia in perianal surgery patients. This information will contribute to the understanding of effective pain management strategies for individuals undergoing perianal surgical procedures and potentially reduce the need for opioids and improve patient outcomes.
use of platelet rich plasma had good effect in treating chronic wounds. healing of perianal fissure could be prolonged and associated with pain. injection of platelet rich plasma under fissure base and edges had the advantage of improved fissure healing and reduction of the pain, with minimal side effects.
Anal fissure (AF) is a painful tear extending from the anal canal to the dentate line. Although the exact pathophysiology is not known, an increase in anal tonus, decreased ano-dermal blood flow and local ischemia are possible mechanisms. The most effective treatment modality in chronic AF is lateral internal sphincterotomy however, incontinence rates are still reported as high as 8-30%. Topical diltiazem and botulinum toxin (BT) injection are good alternatives to surgery with lack of persistent side effects, easy applicability, and reproducibility, however, recurrence rates were reported up to 50% for each. A combination of BT with topical diltiazem may provide better results in terms of healing and recurrence. In this retrospective analysis a comparison of BT injection alone and BT injection combined with topical diltiazem treatment was performed.
Background Anal fissure is one of the most common anorectal problems. After an outbreak of coronavirus disease (COVID-19) has rapidly spread from China to almost all over the world, it nearly affected all countries. In spite of its typical presentation in the form of fever, cough, myalgia, fatigue and pneumonia, other GIT manifestations were reported. We found some of COVID-19 survivors who had complained from anal fissure problem. The aim of this study was to report the prevalence of acute anal fissure among COVID-19 patients, its possible risk factors and outcome. Methods This is a retrospective cross-sectional study which was conducted over three months from the start of September 2020 to the end of November 2020 at Mansoura university isolation hospital, on COVID-19 patients' who were diagnosed with anal fissure. Those who survived and were discharged home safely were telephone called to pick up whether they suffered from any symptoms of anal pain, difficulty in defecation suggesting anal fissure, in order to identify their outcomes, the risk factors for anal fissure development and how they were managed. Results A total of 176 patients were enrolled in this study. Patients were categorized into two groups. The first group included patients who developed anal fissure (n=65) and the 2nd group included patients who did not develop anal fissure (n=111). No significant difference was noted in demographic data apart from the age which was younger in the fissure group. The incidence of anal fissure was 36.9% of total population. The majority of patients' anal fissure problem resolved spontaneously after patients improved from the COVID symptoms without receiving any treatment (43.1%). Conclusion Anal fissure is quite common problem after COVID-19. Young and middle age patients are more vulnerable to develop anal fissure after COVID-19 infection.
Consecutive patients with complex anal fistula were prospectively followed for 12 months. Routine MRI was performed before and at 4 and 12 months after surgery. Continence was assessed likewise using a validated questionnaire. Fistula were drained with setons prior surgery. SVF was harvested from subcutaneous abdominal fat and PRP from peripheral blood. Distal fistulectomy to the sphincter was performed and the wound left open, while the internal orifice was closed. SVF-PRP was injected around the fistula. Patients showered their excision wound until dry. Outcomes were reported as median & interquartile range (IQR)
To compare the efficacy of 'sitz bath' and 'no sitz bath' treatment in terms of pain improvement, rate of cure and fissure healing in Acute Anal Fissure.
The study compares the efficacy and safety of a Propionibacterium extract gel with 0.4% glyceryl trinitrate ointment in the treatment of chronic anal fissure.