Female Infertility of Tubal Origin Clinical Trial
Official title:
The Effect of Intracervical Lidocaine Versus Intramuscular Diclofenac for Pain Relief During Hysterosalpingography Among Infertile Women In A Tertiary Hospital In Kano: A Randomized Controlled Trial
This study compares the effect of intracervical block with 1% lidocaine and intramuscular diclofenac 75mg in decreasing pain perception during hysterosalpingography. Half of participants will receive intracervical block with 1% lidocaine, while the other half will receive intramuscular diclofenac 75mg.
Status | Recruiting |
Enrollment | 140 |
Est. completion date | March 2017 |
Est. primary completion date | February 2017 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | Accepts Healthy Volunteers |
Gender | Female |
Age group | 18 Years to 49 Years |
Eligibility |
Inclusion Criteria: - All women with infertility who will be undergoing a hysterosalpingography, and must have given consent will be recruited into the study Exclusion Criteria: - History of any allergies to local anaesthetics, radio-opaque dye, or anti-inflammatory medications - All patients with active pelvic inflammatory diseases - All patients with chronic pelvic pain - Patients with history of cervical surgery - Other indications for hysterosalpingography like Ashermans syndrome, congenital uterine anomalies |
Allocation: Randomized, Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment, Masking: Double Blind (Subject, Caregiver), Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
Nigeria | Aminu Kano Teaching Hospital | Kano | Kano State |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
Bayer University Kano, Nigeria |
Nigeria,
Ahmad G, Duffy J, Watson AJ. Pain relief in hysterosalpingography. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007 Apr 18;(2):CD006106. Review. Update in: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;9:CD006106. — View Citation
Chauhan MB, Lakra P, Jyotsna D, Nanda S, Malhotra V. Pain relief during hysterosalpingography: role of intracervical block. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2013 Jan;287(1):155-9. doi: 10.1007/s00404-012-2515-z. Epub 2012 Aug 28. — View Citation
Costello MF, Horrowitz S, Steigrad S, Saif N, Bennett M, Ekangaki A. Transcervical intrauterine topical local anesthetic at hysterosalpingography: a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Fertil Steril. 2002 Nov;78(5):1116-22. — View Citation
Hacivelioglu S, Gencer M, Cakir Gungor A, Kosar S, Koc E, Cosar E. Can the addition of a paracervical block to systemic or local analgesics improve the pain perceived by the patient during hysterosalpingography? J Obstet Gynaecol. 2014 Jan;34(1):48-53. doi: 10.3109/01443615.2013.828025. — View Citation
Hamilton M. Infertilty. In Edmonds K (Editor). Dewhurst's Textbook of obstetrics and gynecology. 8th edition. John Wiley and sons ltd 2012 567-79.
Robinson RD, Casablanca Y, Pagano KE, Arthur NA, Bates GW, Propst AM. Intracervical block and pain perception during the performance of a hysterosalpingogram: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2007 Jan;109(1):89-93. — View Citation
Simpson WL Jr, Beitia LG, Mester J. Hysterosalpingography: a reemerging study. Radiographics. 2006 Mar-Apr;26(2):419-31. Review. — View Citation
Sinnatamby CS editor. Last's Anatomy: Regional and Applied. 11th Edition. Edinburgh. Churchill Livingstone; 2006. P 311-6.
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | Change in Visual Analogue Score | A detailed description of the visual analogue scale (VAS) will be given personally to each woman prior to the procedure. The VAS included a 10 cm linear scale on which 0 represents 'no pain' and 10 represents 'worst pain imaginable'. All patients will be asked to grade their perceived lower abdominal pain levels during specified stages of HSG using the VAS as explained to them. The scale will be used at different stages of the procedure: (1) before beginning the procedure; (2) after speculum application but before instrumentation; (3) after the application of the tenaculum and metal cannula and just before the injection of contrast medium; (4) at the end of uterine filling with contrast medium; | Preprocedure and procedure time 0 | No |
Secondary | patient's satisfaction with pain relief in the two groups using Likert scale | Time Frame: 30 minutes post procedure and 24 hours post procedure | No | |
Secondary | Change in pain score from pre-procedure to 5 and 30 minutes post procedure | 5 minutes and 30 minutes | No | |
Secondary | Change in pain score from pre-procedure to 5 and 24 hours post procedure | 5 minutes and 24 hours | No |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Completed |
NCT04071574 -
Comparative Study on the Efficacy of Ovarian Stimulation Protocols on the Success Rate of ICSI in Female Infertility
|
Phase 1/Phase 2 |