View clinical trials related to Female Infertility.
Filter by:The goal of this observational study is to redefine an everyday clinical routine at the Humanitas Fertility center calculating the effects derived from the reduction of inappropriate and avoidable tests, procedures, tools and treatments currently used. Anonymized patients data about clinical procedures are used, taken from the internal database of the Humanitas fertility center
The goal of this monocentric retrospective observational study is to analyse, for the first time in literature, the role of the embryologist who freezes and thaws the embryos. The primary objective of the study is to understand whether the embryologist who freezes and thaws the embryo influences the CPR (clinical pregnancy rate). Secondary objectives, in case of statistically significant influence, are: - Evaluate who influences more the CPR, between the embryologist who freezes the embryos and the embryologist who thaws the embryos. - Evaluate if the embryologist who freezes and thaws the embryo impacts more than the embryologist or the physician who performs the ET. - Evaluate whether the embryologists improve their performances, as their experience increases. - Evaluate, through an external validation test, whether the model used can also be applied at other PMA centres The study will consider all the freezing (vitrifications) and thawing procedures, performed at Humanitas Fertility Center between January 2019 and June 2023. The study will include the transfers of single blastocysts, cryopreserved at Humanitas Fertility Center. On the other hand, the blastocysts transferred from other centres and the donor blastocysts will be excluded from the study, as well as multiple blastocysts transfers and the LP cycles. The embryologist's experience will be assessed in terms of number of previous cryopreservation (vitrification) and thawing procedures. We will include in the study all the embryologists who performed at least 50 freezing and thawing. For the evaluation of the study objectives, data will be gathered using a specific internal web-based database. The final model will be created by analysing the Humanitas Fertility Center dataset and validated using datasets extrapolated from similar population from the San Raffaele Hospital infertility centre
Cryopreservation of embryos and oocytes has become routine in assisted reproduction technology (ART). Live birth rates following frozen embryo transfers have increased significantly. Data show that cryopreservation has significant improved survival rates and cumulative pregnancy rates, as well as the safety of ART . Embryo cryopreservation has become a cornerstone in ART. With improved vitrification techniques. Frozen embryos transfer (FET) shows equal or even higher implantation and pregnancy rates than do fresh embryo transfers ART Previous studies show equal or even superior outcomes regarding pregnancy and live birth rates with frozen versus fresh embryo transfer Cryopreserve all embryos have increased substantially in recent years, and according to the recent trend of a freeze-all strategy. This study aims to answer a clinical question encountered in daily practice regarding at what stage embryos should be frozen.
Although Caesarean section (CS) is often a necessary surgical intervention, it may also be associated with an increased risk of short- and long-term sequelae. It was thought that CS may increase the risk of female subfertility or even infertility. In assisted reproductive technology (ART) cycles, the process of implantation is believed to be the most important factor in determining pregnancy outcome. In view of conflicting results on the influence of a previous CS on outcomes of ART, this study will be conducted to investigate the impact of the mode of previous delivery on ICSI outcomes.
Hormonal milieu during implantation is crucial to embryo-endometrium interaction and to the viability of the conceptus. Alterations in the peri-implantation environment are considered to impair perinatal outcomes in intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) therapy. GnRH-a is a new and promising modality for LPS. Regimens for using GnRH-a in LPS, including single mid-luteal bolus or the addition of a GnRH-a to progesterone supplementation, have been recently suggested. The aim of this study is to evaluate the impact of addition of mid-luteal single-dose or multiple-dose GnRH agonist to the routine luteal phase support in patients undergoing ICSI cycles using GnRH antagonist protocol.
Despite the use of various treatment strategies, poor response to ovarian stimulation remains a major clinical challenge with lower chance to obtain sufficient number of oocytes and thus less likely to conceive with high risk of cycle cancellation. The aim of this study is to evaluate the effect of recombinant human GH administration to gonadotropins on clinical and laboratory ICSI outcomes in expected poor responders more and less than 35 years (Poseidon group 4 and 3 respectively).
Depended on the hypothesis that growth asynchrony of antral follicles is a consequence of the gradual follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) elevation that occurs during the late luteal phase, the aim of this work is to study the effect of estradiol pretreatment on follicular synchronization and intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) outcome in antagonist cycles
Hormonal monitoring impact on overall pregnancy rate in frozen embryo transfer (FET)cycles and hence progesterone supplement adjustments remain debatable in current literature. This prospective randomized study aims to investigate the effect of monitoring and follow-up of serum progesterone, estradiol & luteinizing hormone (LH) levels and progesterone supplement adjustments on pregnancy outcomes for FET in programmed hormonal replacement therapy cycles in comparison with ultrasound only in control group
The purpose of this prospective cohort study is to assess the effect of endometrial compaction caused by progesterone effect on pregnancy outcomes
The association between serum progesterone (P) levels, measured on the day of ovulation trigger, and the outcome of in vitro fertilization cycles, has been one of the major controversies in the field of ovarian stimulation endocrinology. This is a single-center retrospective cohort study. Study duration period is from January 2012 to December 2016. All fresh embryo transfer (ET) both at cleavage stage and blastocyst stage, performed in Humanitas Fertility Center during the study period, were included.