Clinical Trial Details
— Status: Completed
Administrative data
NCT number |
NCT05146960 |
Other study ID # |
BC-10785 |
Secondary ID |
|
Status |
Completed |
Phase |
N/A
|
First received |
|
Last updated |
|
Start date |
November 9, 2021 |
Est. completion date |
January 1, 2022 |
Study information
Verified date |
December 2023 |
Source |
University Ghent |
Contact |
n/a |
Is FDA regulated |
No |
Health authority |
|
Study type |
Interventional
|
Clinical Trial Summary
Central sensitization (CS) is a common feature in chronic musculoskeletal pain conditions
including rheumatoid arthritis, chronic whiplash syndrome, fibromyalgia, temporomandibular
joint disorders, low back pain and lateral elbow pain. CS is defined as "an amplification of
neural signaling within the central nervous system that elicits pain hypersensitivity".
Clinical signs are allodynia, hyperalgesia and widespread pain, originating from the enhanced
activity of central nervous system to peripheral afferent input from unimodal and polymodal
receptors.
CS not only induces abnormal pain processing, it may also lead to motor performance
dysfunction in chronic pain population. CS induce cortical reorganization including changes
in gray matter, cortical representation and cortical excitability both in motor and
somatosensory cortex. This process ultimately generates sensorimotor conflict that described
as a mismatch between motor intention and sensory feedback, and may directly effect on motor
performance. The structural changes in basal ganglia and reduced GABAergic activity in the
motor cortex contribute to the alteration of the motor performance. It has been known that CS
and fatigue, another indicator of the motor performance, has a bidirectional effect and
fatigue is predicted by CS, independently of the presence of pain. CS affect fatigue via
causing disrupted reward process, increased effort and pain expactation.
The increased cervical spine hypersensitivity in patients with LEP even if there is no
accompanied neck or upper limb pain may also indicate of the fatigue as pain does not always
suggest an injury and biomechanical damage to a tissue does not always suggest that an
individual will experience pain. If neck muscle fatigue is effected by central sensitization
in patients with LEP, it can be important to develop therapeutic strategies to prevent neck
muscle fatigue as there is a relationship between fatigue and increased risk of injury.
Despite the fact that central sensitization effect on neck pain has been well documented in
patients with LEP, its role on fatigue had not gain enough clinical and research attention.
To know about central sensitization effect on motor performance can also be useful for
determine subgroup of population who have central sensitization. However, it is unknown
whether remote body endurance alteration occur in lateral elbow pain or not.
Description:
EMG assessment Electrode Placement Before electrode placement, the skin will be cleaned with
alcohol to reduce skin impedance.
Sternocleidomastoid Muscle (SCM) Electrode Placement Electrodes will be placed to the the
sternal head of the SCM while participants were sitting in a erect position. A line will be
drawn from the sternal notch to the mastoid process and marked at 1/3 of the distance from
the sternal notch. Electrodes initially will placed adjacent to the this point with 20 mm
apart and over the muscle belly based on the muscle palpation during manually resisted neck
flexion contractions. This location is anticipated to place between the innervation zone and
the tendon. In supine, the head will be placed in a neutral anatomic position that
craniocervical and cervical spine is in a mid position. It will be ensured visually by
examiner that cervical spine is in the neutral position which means from the middle of the
subject's forehead to the middle of the chin is horizontal and a line bisecting the neck
longitudinally is parallel to the treatment plinth. Participants will asked to completely
relax in this position. For normalization, isometric neck flexor contraction will be carried
out in supine position via applying manual resistance on frontal region by gradually
increasing force that reached maximum force level in 2 second and then contracted maximally
for 5 second. This procedure will be repeated 3 times with a 30 second time interval.
Upper Trapezius (UT) Muscle Electrode Placement Electrodes will be attached 20% laterally to
the midpoint between the dorsal processes of C4 and the posterior lateral third of the
clavicle. For normalization, manual resistance will be given neck extensor while participant
lying in prone position. Contraction will be lasted 5 second for 3 times with 30 interval.
After electrode placement, a 5 seconds rest recording will be performed for eliminating basal
noise from recording. During the endurance test, participants will asked not to cough, laugh
or talk and head position will be controlled by inclinometer adapted to EMG system.
Participants will be given 3 minutes resting time between neck flexor/extensor endurance
tests for the experimental group.
Neck Flexor Endurance Test An examiner will place her hand under the occiput of the
participant, while the participant is lying in supine position with the knees bend and the
arms resting on the abdomen. Cranicervical flexion will be taught to the participants. For
this, participants will asked to place tongue on roof of the mouth, with lips together and
teeth slightly apart while cervical spine is in neutral position. Participants will not be
allowed to open mouth during the test. Participants will be requested to perform gentle head
nodding as if saying "yes" via sliding head in caudal and cephalic directions on the bed and
concentrate feeling of back of the head. After learning of the craniocervical flexion, the
participant will be requested to head off from the examiners hand (approximately 2.5 cm from
the plint) vhile maintaining the craniocervical flexion and then sustain this position as
long as possible. The holding time will be recorded with a stopwatch. The test will be ended
once the participant is unable to hold their head in a correct position that chances occur
more than 5 degree for more than one second, can no longer maintain craniocervical flexion or
head position due to fatigue.
Neck Extensor Endurance Test Participants will be asked to lie in a prone position
maintaining thoracal extension with a strap at the level of T6, arms in their side and head
is end of the plinth. The subject's head and neck will be positioned in a comfortable neutral
position with the chin retracted. 2 kg weight will be placed around the participants head.
Participants will be asked to sustain this position as long as possible after removing
support from the head. The test will be ended when the participant can no longer sustain a
correct position or when the head position changes more than 5 degrees. The holding time will
be recorded with a stopwatch.
Experimental group:
Experimental pain induction: Temporal Summation Then participants will be asked to seat in a
comfortable position placing their volar faces of the tested dominant arm in elbow flexion on
a table during the experiment. The tested area will be marked with a pen to apply every
stimulus in the same place.
Temporal summation will be evoked in a predetermined area:
1. ECRL muscle origin: Distal humerus supracondylar ridge;
2. ECRB muscle belly: identified with resisted radial wrist flexion
3. Brachioradialis: 2 cm distal from in the middle of the line extend from lateral
epicondyle to middle of the fossa cubiti via identifying resisted elbow flexion in 90°
elbow flexion and wrist in neutral position Pressure pain thresholds (PPTs) will be
identified two times with a 30 s interval for each predetermined area via applying
circular probe in a perpendicular direction with an increasing pressure at a rate of
approximately 1 kg/s. PPTs will be recorded when the sensation of the mechanical
pressure stimulus changes into the first painful sensation. The average of two
measurements will be used as a PPTs value. Temporal summation was induced two minutes
after last PPTs was recorded. To evoke temporal summation at the lateral elbow, the
probe will be applied with the pressure of the predefined PPT threshold at the rate of
approximately 2 kg/s where it will be maintained for 1 s before being released with a 1
s interstimulus interval (ISI). This procedure will be repeated 10 times in each
predetermined area. Pain intensity will be asked to participants at first, fifth and
tenth pulse using a Visual Analog Scale range from "0 indicate no pain" to "10 most
painful".
Placebo Group: After flexor and extensor endurance test, participants will be provided 20
minutes resting time. PPTs value will be evaluted once in each predetermined region with a 30
s interval.
Before PPTs assessment in predetermined area on lateral elbow, a familirisation session for
the perceived PTTs by participants will be performed on palm of the non dominant arm for each
group.